In science fiction there is to be found the recurrent theme of the omniscient computer which ultimately takes over the ordering of human life and affairs. Is this possible? I believe is it not: but also believe that the arguments commonly advanced to refute this possibility are the wrong ones. First it is often said that computers "do not really think". This I submit is nonsense: if computers do not think, then nor do human beings. For how do I define the process of thinking? I present data—say, an examination paper—to a student, which he scans with a photoelectric organ we call an "eye", the computer scans its data with a photoelectric organ we call a "tape-reader". There is then a period when nothing obvious happens, through electroencephalogram—for the student. Lastly, information based on the data is transcribed by means of a mechanical organ called a "hand" by the student and a "teleprinter" by the computer. In other words, the actions of man and machine differ only in the appliances they use. Secondly, it is said that computers "only do what they are told", that they have to be programmed for every computation they undertake. But I do not believe that I was born with an innate ability to solve quadratic equations or to identify common members of the Britain flora: I, too, had to be programmed for these activities, but I happened to call my programmers by different names, such as "schoolteacher", "lecture" or "professor". Lastly, we are told that computers, unlike human beings, cannot interpret their own results. But interpretation is always of one set of information in the light of another set of information: it consists simply of finding the joint pattern in two sets of data. The mathematics of doing this is cumbersome but well known; the computer would be perfectly willing to do the job if asked.
单选题 What is the author"s attitude towards "the recurrent theme of the omniscient computer" which will ultimately take over the ordering of human life and affairs?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:根据第一段,作者说有人提出了"计算机最终将控制人类生活",他认为这是不可能的,见第2、3句Is this possible? I believe it is not.其中it即指possibility。
单选题 In the passage, the author ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:有人提出了"计算机将控制人类",作者不同意,也有其他反对这种观点的人来反驳这种观点,他们提出了三个论据,但作者认为这三点也都是站不住脚的。因此,根据第一段,本题应选答案选项。
单选题 According to the author, as far as "thinking" is concerned, computer is different from human beings in the fact that ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:根据文意,作者认为计算机与人的区别就在于the appliance they use。
单选题 What does the last paragraph mean?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:在此段中,作者表达了自己对一些人的"人类翻译能力强于计算机"论点的不同看法,认为这不足以证明"计算机不能控制人类"。
单选题 What is the author"s best intention in writing this passage?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:在本文中,作者既想表明计算机不能取代人来掌管人类的生活,又要说明人们在反驳这种可能性时出现的谬误。