单选题 For years, studies have found that first-generation college students—those who do not have a parent with a college degree—lag other students on a range of education achievement factors. Their grades are lower and their dropout rates are higher. But since such students are most likely to advance economically if they succeed in higher education, colleges and universities have pushed for decades to recruit more of them. This has created "a paradox" in that recruiting first-generation students, but then watching many of them fail, means that higher education has "continued to reproduce and widen, rather than close" an achievement gap based on social class, according to the depressing beginning of a paper forthcoming in the journal Psychological Science .
But the article is actually quite optimistic, as it outlines a potential solution to this problem, suggesting that an approach (which involves a one-hour, next-to-no-cost program) can close 63 percent of the achievement gap (measured by such factors as grades) between first-generation and other students.
The authors of the paper are from different universities, and their findings are based on a study involving 147 students (who completed the project) at an unnamed private university. First generation was defined as not having a parent with four-year college degree. Most of the first-generation students (59.1 percent) were recipients of Pell Grants, a federal grant for undergraduates with financial need, while this was true only for 8.6 percent of the students with at least one parent with a four-year degree.
Their thesis—that a relatively modest intervention could have a big impact—was based on the view that first-generation students may be most lacking not in potential but in practical knowledge about how to deal with the issues that face most college students. They cite past research by several authors to show that this is the gap that must be narrowed to close the achievement gap.
Many first-generation students "struggle to navigate the middle-class culture of higher education, learn the "rules of the game," and take advantage of college resources," they write. And this becomes more of a problem when colleges don"t talk about the class advantages and disadvantages of different groups of students. "Because US colleges and universities seldom acknowledge how social class can affect students" educational experiences, many first-generation students lack of sight about why they are struggling and do not understand how students "like them" can improve."
单选题 Recruiting more first-generation students has ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 根据题干关键词“recruiting mote first-generation students”可定位到文章第一段第四句。该句中的“This has created "a paradox" in that recruiting first-generation students…”与C项“missed its original purpose(违背初衷)”是同义替换,文中的paradox意为“自相矛盾,似是而非的观点”。故答案为C。
单选题 The authors of the research article are optimistic because ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 根据题干关键词“article”和“optimistic”可定位到文章第二段第一句“But the article is actually quite optimistic, as it outlines a potential solution to this problem…”。该句意为:但是这篇文章中的观点相当乐观,因为针对这个问题,它已经勾勒出一个可能的解决方案。A项意为“问题是可解决的”,符合文意。故答案为A。
单选题 The study suggests that most first-generation students ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 根据题干关键词“the study”和“most first-generation students”可定位到文章第三段第三句“Most of the first-generation students(59.1 percent) were recipients of Pell Grants, a federal grant for undergraduates with financial need…”。该句意为:大多数初代大学生(59.1%)都接受了佩尔助学金,这是联邦政府向有经济需要的大学生提供的助学金。由此可推知,大多数初代大学生需要经济支援(are in need of financial support)。
单选题 The author of the paper believe that first-generation students ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 根据文章第四段第一句可知,这些论文基于一个观点,即:初代大学生最缺乏的不是潜力,而是关于如何应对大多数大学生都会面对的问题的实践知识。也就是说,初代大学生在大学里应对不同问题时缺乏经验。D项意为“(初代大学生)在大学里处理自己的问题时缺乏经验”,符合文意。故答案为D。
单选题 We may infer from the last paragraph that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题需在对文章最后一段把握大意的基础上进行推理判断。该段第一句和第二句是并列关系,均表明初代大学生中存在的与社会阶层有关的问题。第三句以一个because所引导的原因状语从句点明中心,明确该问题的来源是美国高校未承认社会阶层对学生教育经历的影响。综上,可总结出,高校应该为正在讨论的问题担负一部分责任。