单选题
The Rise in Oil Prices

Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979—1980, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere, could push the price higher still in the short term.
Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic c6nsequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (in constant prices) rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973. The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25—0.5% of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand, oil-importing emerging economies—to which heavy industry has shifted have become more energy-intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed.
One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The Economist"s commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%, and in 1979 by almost 30%.
单选题 The main reason for the latest rise of oil price is ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题问的是油价最近上涨的原因。原文第一段的第二句话明确说到,Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. 由此可知,世界原油价格的上涨主要是因为OPEC决定减少供应。因此,本题的正确答案为B。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically if ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题问的是在什么情况下汽油的零售价也会随之上涨。原文第三段的最后一句话明确说到,在欧洲,油税占了汽油零售价的五分之四,即使原油价格有很大的变化也不会像以前一样对油价有很大影响。可见,影响汽油零售价的主要因素是油税。也就是说,如果油税上涨,汽油的零售价也会随之上涨。因此,本题的正确答案为D。
单选题 The estimates in Economic Outlook show that in rich countries ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题问的是《经济嘹望》杂志的估计表明了发达国家的什么信息。原文第四段的第五句话说到,最近一期的《经济嘹望》杂志的估计:与1998年的每桶13美元相比,如果油价持续一年在22美元左右的话,石油进口支出也只占了发达国家国内生产总值(GDP)的0.25%~0.5%。可见,油价的上涨对发达国家的GDP影响并不大。因此,本题的正确答案为D。
单选题 We can draw a conclusion from the text that ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题问的是从本文中可以得出什么结论。原文第三段的第一句话明确说到,Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. 说明这次油价的上涨不会像20世纪70年代那么严重。并且接着介绍了原因。由此可推出,A选项的说法是正确的。故本题的正确答案为A。
单选题 From the text we can see that the writer seems ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题问的是作者的态度。根据全文内容可知,作者认为这次油价上涨的影响不会太严重,可见,作者对此持乐观的态度。因此,本题的正确答案为A。