| YES | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Boys and girls distract each other from their education, especially in adolescence as their sexu- al and emotional sides develop. Too much time can be spent attempting to impress or even sexu- ally harassing each other. Academic competition between the sexes is unhealthy and only adds to unhappiness and anxi- ety among weaker students. As Tricia Kelleher, a school principal, argues, "rather than girls defining themselves by their interests, they define them- selves by what the boys think of them or what other girls think boys think of them". Furthermore, John Silber, President of Boston University, declared that his university would pri- oritize male applications in order to even up the student composition and ensure the male popula- Lion did not become "ungentlemanly" towards women due to their numerical inferiority. A single- sex environment is therefore a space where chil- dren can learn without feeling pressurized by the other sex. | In fact boys and girls are a good influ- ence on each other, engendering good behav- ior and maturity—particularly as teenage girls usually exhibit greater responsibility than boys of the same age. Academic competition between the sexes is a spur to better performance at school. Any negative effects of co-educational schools have been explained away by studies as the result of other factors, such as "classroom size, economic discrepancies and cultural differences". Furthermore, the separation of boys and girls only serves to embrace sexual objectifi- cation, for they exist for each other only as dates rather than the classmates they would be in a co-educational environment. Allowing them into the same educational environment, in part to permit them to distract each other, is a welcome social development as well as a beneficial learning curve. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||