阅读理解     The economic debate in the U.S. regarding the fiscal stimulus package centered on 'bang for the buck,' that is, on whether tax cuts or spending increases would produce more jobs. This limited perspective is very misleading, however: the choice of spending versus taxes should turn first and foremost on the purposes of government, or what economists call 'the allocation of resources.' It's silly to debate whether investing in a $1OO-million bridge creates more jobs than a $1OO-million tax cut if we need the bridge! The American Society of Civil Engineers has long documented the crumbling state of U.S. infrastructure and the pressing need for $2.2 trillion in investments for our well-being and competitiveness.
    Government spending and taxation affect the distribution of income demographically and temporally. America ranks 22nd out of 23 high-income countries in public social outlays as a percentage of national income for health, pensions, income support and other social services. Our political discourse tends to focus on the middle class and neglect the poor, whereas our tax and spending policies often benefit the wealthy. As a result, the U.S. has the largest poverty rate, income inequality and per-capita prison population of any high-income nation, as well as the worst health conditions..
    The timing of tax cuts and spending increases also affects the well-being of today's generation versus future ones. The U.S. has a chronic fiscal deficit because federal taxation is enough to cover only five types of federal programs: retirement and disability, medical care, veterans' programs, defense and homeland security, and interest on the public debt. All other federal outlays are in effect funded by borrowing. The chronic deficit problem, now at least 5 percent of GNP (Gross National Product), will tend to get much worse as the population ages and health care costs rise, until we finally choose to tax ourselves adequately to pay for the government we need and want.
    Temporary deficits can boost the economy in a recession, although temporary income tax cuts and rebates tend to be saved rather than spent. Prolonged deficit spending, however, would impose future burdens. The most obvious will be the need to service the public debts owed to China and other holders of treasury bills-the U.S. is on a path to multiply its already massive international debts. Less obviously, the huge budget deficits will crowd out some private investment spending and exports as the economy recovers. Higher taxes needed to cover the service on that debt will not only squeeze consumption but may also distort the economy through disincentives on saving, work or other activities.
单选题     The author holds that the focus of the debate is misleading in that ______.
 
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】题目询问作者认为辩论焦点存在误导性的原因。根据misleading定位到第一段第2句。however后面谈到,究竟是在开支上还是在税务上下功夫,这个选择必须首先体现政府目的,C项中的alms对于文章的purposes,first对应first and foremost,故正确。 A项只是利用$100-million tax cut做干扰,其表述在原文找不到依据。B项是作者举的例子,并且是作者的观点,与题目询问无关。D项的表述与题目无关。
单选题     We can conclude from paragraph 2 that ______.
 
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】第二段讲述了政府开支和税收存在忽略贫困人群的问题。最后一句谈到影响:贫困率高、收入不均等情况,结合选项,只有B项的表述正确。 该段讲述的正是政府开支和税收对国民的影响,A项与文中观点相反。该段没有谈到债务(debt)的问题,也没有谈论个人投资支出和出口,排除C、D两项。
单选题     The chronic fiscal deficit of the U.S. is due to ______.
 
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】题目询问美国长期财政赤字的原因。根据chronic fiscal deficit定位到第三段第2句。because后面表明,美国的联邦税收只能覆盖五种联邦项目,言外之意是联邦税收不足,即D项。 联邦项目是否在增加,在文中没有做出说明,排除A项。B项和C项都是五大联邦项目覆盖的对象,无法得知是否是美国长期赤字的原因,故排除。
单选题     It can be inferred from the last paragraph that ______.
 
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】最后一段第1句although后面表明,暂时的所得税削减和回扣常常是存起来而不是花出去。既然如此,那么暂时的减税政策就无法促进消费了,所以A项的表述正确。 该段第1句谈到暂时的财政赤字能在经济萧条时期(recession)提升经济,这与B项的表述有出入,B项忽略了recession这个时间段,属于过度推断。第2句表明,延长赤字开支的时间会给将来带来重担,而不是C项所说的“暂时的赤字开支”。最后一段没有提及征税和提升经济的关系,所以排除D项。
单选题     According to the text, prolonged deficit spending may result in ______.
 
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】题目询问延长赤字开支可能导致的结果。根据prolonged deficit spending定位到最后一段第2句。该句首先表明延长赤字开支的时间会给将来带来重担,接着开始谈论各种坏处,其中包括提高税收还债会挤压消费(squeeze consumption),这与B项的表述吻合。 第2句表明长期财政赤字有害经济,C项不符合文章逻辑。第4句表明巨额预算赤字会挤掉一些个人投资支出和出口,故排除A和D项。