阅读理解   Stephanie Smith, a children's dance instructor, thought she had a stomach virus. The aches and cramping were tolerable that first day, and she finished her classes. Then her diarrhea turned bloody. Her kidneys shut down. Seizures knocked her unconscious. The convulsions grew so relentless that doctors had to put her in a coma for nine weeks. When she emerged, she could no longer walk. The affliction had ravaged her nervous system and left her paralyzed from the waist down.
    Ms. Smith, 22, was found to have a severe form of food-borne illness caused by E. coli, which Minnesota officials traced to the hamburger that her mother had grilled for their Sunday family party. In the simplest terms, she ran out of luck in a food-safety game of chance whose rules and risks are not widely known.
    Meat companies and grocers have been barred from selling ground beef tainted by the virulent strain of E. coli known as o157:H7 since 1994. Yet tens of thousands of people are still sickened annually by this pathogen with hamburger being the biggest culprit. Ground beef has been blamed for 16 outbreaks in the last three years alone. This summer, contamination led to the recall of beef from nearly 3,000 grocers in 41 states.
    Ms. Smith's reaction to the virulent strain of E. coli was extreme, but tracing the story of her burger shows that neither the system meant to make the meat safe, nor the meat itself, is what consumer have been led to believe.
    Ground beef is usually not simply a chunk of meat run through a grinder. Instead, a single portion of hamburger meat is often an amalgam of various grades of meat from different parts of cows and even from different slaughterhouses. This makes the costs 25% less than it would have for cuts of whole meat. These cuts of meat are particularly vulnerable to E. coli contamination, food experts and officials say. Despite this, there is no federal requirement for grinders to test their ingredients for the pathogen.
    Those ingredients include cuts from areas of the cow that are more likely to have had contact with feces, which carries E. coli, industry research shows. Yet most meat companies rely on their suppliers to check for the bacteria and do their own testing only after the ingredients are ground together.
    Unwritten agreements between some companies appear to stand in the way of ingredient testing. Many big slaughterhouses will sell only to grinders who agree not to test their shipments for E. coli for fear of a recall of ingredients they sold to others.
    'Ground beef is not a completely safe product,' said Dr. Jeffrey Bender, a food safety expert at the University of Minnesota who helped develop systems for tracing E. coli contamination. He said that while outbreaks had been on the decline, 'unfortunately it looks like we are going a bit in the opposite direction.'
单选题     What is the main idea of this passage?
 
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】 主旨题。本文从一个病例入手,最后落脚到为什么碎牛肉(ground beef)在经过检测后还能携带大肠杆菌,从而对人体造成伤害。本文从第五段开始讲述碎牛肉的检测过程,点出了检测过程中的潜规则,最后一段得出结论:碎牛肉并非安全。因此能总结本文大意的最佳答案为D(牛肉检测系统的漏洞)。A选项过于细节,B选项与原文不符,C选项(食物中毒的案例)停留在了文章的引子,而并非实质。
单选题     We can learn from the passage that ______.
 
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】 推理题。A选项偷换了概念:原文第三段中讲到tens of thousands of people会因为大肠杆菌致病,但该选项中用的most,即全体中的大多数,故该选项不对;B选项中的16对应的范围与原文不符合,原文中的16次爆发对应的是碎牛肉导致的大肠杆菌中毒事件;C选项中的41个州在原文中对应的细节为:给41个州销售了碎牛肉,故错误。只有D选项是正确的,可在第四段中首句...was extreme推理得知答案。
单选题     The reason behind the way ground beef is produced is ______.
 
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】 细节题。碎牛肉如此制作,原因在于成本问题。该题答案在第四段中“This makes the costs 25% less than it would have...”即为了减少成本,获取更多的利益。
单选题     We can infer that many big slaughterhouses ______.
 
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】 推理题。通过big slaughterhouse定位到第七段第二句,大意是:很多大型屠宰场担心会召回已经出售的货物,因此只会将原料销售给同意不对其货物进行测试的商家。由此可推理得知,这些大型屠宰场的担心证明他们其实很清楚自己的产品感染大肠杆据的可能性。因此本题答案为C。B选项中cannot be too careful是一个特殊结构,意思是“十分小心”,与原文含义相反。
单选题     As Bender implies at the end of the passage, ______.
 
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】 推理题。最后一段的大意是:尽管爆发病例在减少,但不凑巧的是,我们似乎悖行得更远了。转折后的语义暗示了,整体情况是不尽如人意的。因此正确答案为C。A选项混淆性最大,该选项的意思是Bender建议人们远离牛肉制品,最后一段的首句讲到的却是“碎牛肉不是完全安全的”,这里偷换了概念。