填空题
In mediaeval times, the region that led the world in
technological{{U}} (1) {{/U}}was China.{{U}} (2) {{/U}}, Europe
north and west of the Alps was a backwater that had invented nothing{{U}}
(3) {{/U}}except for improved watermills. How did China{{U}} (4)
{{/U}}in science and technology to Europe? Two papers by Graeme Lang, rich
with broad implications, address this paradox{{U}} (5) {{/U}}structural
or ultimate causation.
Lang begins by pointing out that{{U}}
(6) {{/U}}scientific inquiry in Europe developed within a{{U}} (7)
{{/U}}European institution: autonomous universities where critical inquiry
was relatively{{U}} (8) {{/U}}by governmental or religious authority.
Between A. D. 1450 and 1650, 90% of Europeans now considered to be{{U}} (9)
{{/U}}to science receiver university educations, and half of them held
career posts at universities. There was{{U}} (10) {{/U}}in China. Why
not?
Historical causation is like an onion, whose concentric
layers must be peeled back{{U}} (11) {{/U}}to reveal the ultimate causes
at the center. Lang sees the autonomous universities on the onion's outer
skin{{U}} (13) {{/U}}springing from an underlying layer of European
political fragmentation. Mediaeval Europe was still divided into a thousand
independent statelets, whereas China was already unified in 221 B.C. So it
proved impossible to suppress critical thinking for long in Europe: a thinker{{U}}
(14) {{/U}}in one statelet could (and often did) merely walk into the
next. To take just one example, the astronomer Johann Kepler was always able
to{{U}} (15) {{/U}}the authorities by moving away.
Technological innovations were as hard to suppress in Europe as was
scientific inquiry. Competition between statelets provided a positive{{U}}
(16) {{/U}}for them to adopt innovations that might yield military or
economic advantages{{U}} (17) {{/U}}. (One such beneficiary was
Christopher Columbus, whose schemes for ocean exploration were rebuffed in five
states before he received backing from the sixth, Spain. ){{U}} (18)
{{/U}}, China's unity meant that the decision of a single emperor could{{U}}
(19) {{/U}}over the whole of China—the demise of China's clocks,{{U}}
(20) {{/U}}fleets and water powered spinning machines being only the
most flagrant instances.