单选题 .  Fertilizer use has exploded, overloading plants worldwide, likely altering ecosystems for decades to centuries, scientists report Thursday. In the journal Science, a review led by Donald Canfield of the University of Southern Denmark found that fertilizer use worldwide increased 800% from 1960 to 2000. "Given the rising costs of synthetic fertilizer production, this overuse is not only economically expensive, but also initiates a series of large-scale environmental impacts," says the review.
    Fundamentally, nitrogen from fertilizers has led to an explosion in "dead zones" in seas and oceans, upsetting a cycle of nutrients balanced with growth that has lasted for billions of years, the authors find. As well, the excess nitrogen is forming large amounts of nitrous oxide (一氧化二氮), a powerful greenhouse gas in wetlands, adding to climate change. Agriculture today produces about a quarter of the nitrous oxide in the atmosphere.
    "The effects of humans have been profound. In the last few decades we have doubled the worldwide biological availability of nitrogen, an element that often limits growth of plants and algae," says Thomas Jordan of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in Edgewater, Md., who was not part of the review. The review, "is a very careful analysis of the nitrogen cycle by three of the world authorities in this area," says biochemist Robert Blankenship of Washington University in St. Louis, who also was not part of the review. "The concerns they raise for how the nitrogen cycle is now significantly out of balance are important and need to be addressed by changing agricultural practices. The world's food supply depends directly on nitrogen application in the form of fertilizer, but current practices are such that much of the applied nitrogen ends up in rivers and eventually in the ocean where it causes serious problems."
    "Natural feedbacks driven by microorganisms will likely produce a new steady state over time scales of many decades," say the review authors. "However, because of the projected increase in human population through at least 2050, there will be demand for an increase in fixed nitrogen for crops to feed this population." And that will mean a lot more dead zones, they warn, like the one that blooms yearly, in 2010 about the size of New Jersey, in the Gulf of Mexico.
    "Several new approaches and a much wider use of more sustainable time-honored practices, however, can decrease nitrogen use substantially," they conclude. The rising cost and environmental toll of fertilizers will increase demand for less use on farms, they add. "However, even with management, the future cycle will likely be different from the one that preceded the Industrial Revolution."1.  Fertilizers impose great impact on the environment because ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】 根据题目中的impact on the environment定位至第1段最后一句和第2段。
   第1段最后一句提到了使用化肥会给环境带来巨大影响,而第2段则具体解释了化肥对环境的影响主要体现为其产生的氮会导致气候变化等问题。因此,本题应选D。
   A和B都是第1段提到的相关内容,但这些都与“对环境的影响”无关,不符合题意;C中nutrients一词可在第2段第1句找到,但原文并没有提到化肥里含有的nutrients(营养物)是多是少,C没有原文依据。
[参考译文]
   科学家于周四称,化肥的用量在激增,世界上植物使用的化肥已经过量,这有可能改变未来几十年甚至几个世纪的生态系统。美国《科学》杂志刊登了一篇由南丹麦大学唐纳德·康菲尔德所主持撰写的文章。文章指出,从1960至2000年,全球化肥用量增加了800%。“考虑到合成肥料的生产成本日益增高,过度使用化肥不仅会提高农业成本,而且还会给环境带来巨大影响”,文章说道。
   文章作者发现,从根本上说,化肥中释放的氮气会使海洋中“不毛之地”增多,从而影响着数十亿年来一直平衡发展的营养物循环。另外,过多地使用氮肥会产生大量的一氧化二氮——存在于湿地中的一种非常浓烈的温室气体,导致气候发生变化。今天的农业生产已生产出了大气中四分之一的一氧化二氮。
   未参与这项研究的马里兰州厄齐沃特史密森尼环境研究中心的托马斯·乔丹说:“这对人类的影响很深远。在过去几十年里,我们使世界上氮素生物的有效性翻了一番,而这往往会抑制植物和海藻的生长。”同样未参与这项研究的圣路易斯华盛顿大学的生物化学家罗伯特·布兰肯希普说,这篇文章“是这一领域中三位世界级权威对氮循环的详细分析。”“他们让人们注意到现在的氮循环是多么的不平衡,这个问题很重要,需要我们改变农业生产方式来解决。世界上的粮食供应直接依靠化肥中的氮素,但目前农业生产中化肥的使用情况使大多数的氮渗入了河流中,最后流入大海,造成了严重的问题。”
   文章的几位作者指出,“微生物活动也许能够在未来几十年创造一个新的稳定态氮循环”。“但由于世界上的人口预计至少2050年还会增加到,要养活这么多人,对用于农作物的固体氮的需求就还将增加”。几位专家警告说,这就意味着地球上还会出现更多像墨西哥湾海洋死区那样的“不毛之地”,这片区域每年都在扩大,在2010年就相当于新泽西州大小了。
   “不过新的农业生产模式和大范围使用更具可持续性的传统施肥方式可以有效降低氮肥的使用”,几位专家总结道。化肥日益增加的成本和对环境的危害会使农业用氮的需求降低,他们补充说道。“但即使对化肥的使用进行管理,未来的氮循环仍然可能不同于工业革命以前”。