单选题
{{B}}Part A{{/B}}
There are three reading passages in this part. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A, B, C and D. You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on the Answer Sheet with a single line through the center.
If there is one thing scientists have to hear, it is that the game is over. Raised on the belief of an endless voyage of discovery, they recoil (畏缩) from the suggestion that most of the best things have already been located. If they have, today' s scientists can hope to contribute no more than a few grace notes to the symphony of science.
A book to be published in Britain this week, The End of Science, argues persuasively that this is the case. Its author, John Horgan, is a senior writer for Scientific American magazine, who has interviewed many of today's leading scientists and science philosophers. The shock of realizing that science might be over came to him, he says, when he was talking to Oxford mathematician and physicist Sir Roger Penrose.
The End of Science provoked a wave of denunciation (谴责) in the United States last year. "The reaction has been one of complete shock and disbelief," Mr. Horgan says.
The real question is whether any remaining unsolved problems, of which there are plenty, lend themselves to universal solutions. If they do not, then the focus of scientific discovery is already narrowing. Since the triumphs of the 1960s--the genetic code, plate tectonics (板块构造税), and the microwave background radiation that went a long way towards proving the Big Bang--genuine scientific revolutions have been scarce. More scientists are now alive, spending more money on research, than ever. Yet most of the great discoveries of the 19th and 20th centuries were made before the appearance of state sponsorship, when the scientific enterprise was a fraction of its present size.
Were the scientists who made these discoveries brighter than today's? That seems unlikely. A far more reasonable explanation is that fundamental science has already entered a period of diminished returns. "Look, don't get me wrong," says Mr. Horgan. "There are lots of important things still to study, and applied science and engineering can go on for ever. I hope we get a cure for cancer, and for mental disease, though there are few real signs of progress."
单选题 The sentence "most of the best things have already been located" could mean ______ .
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 文章第一段讲到,假如一些东西科学家必须去听,那表示:游戏结束了;他们是在“科学发现的旅程永无止境”的信念下长大的,因此对这样的暗示表示出畏缩……。可见本句话应该是“大多数神秘之物已经被发现了”。所以应该选D。
单选题 John Horgan ______ . Ⅰ. has published a book entitled The End of Science Ⅱ. has been working as an editor of Scientific American Ⅲ. has been working many years as a literary critic Ⅳ. is working as a science writer
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 文章第二段“A book to be published in Britain this week,The End of Science,argues persuasively that this is the case.Its author,John Horgan,is a senior writer for Scientific American magazine,who has interviewed many of today's leading scientists and science philosophers.”本周在英国出版的《科学的末日》一书的作者约翰·霍根是《科学的美国》杂志的一名资深撰稿人,他采访了许多当今最主要的科学家和自然科学哲学家。可见,约翰·霍根出版了书籍《科学的末日》,是《科学的美国》杂志的撰稿人,写的是有关科学的文章。所以Ⅰ和Ⅳ说法正确。约翰·霍根是《科学的美国》的撰稿人而不是编辑,Ⅰ的内容不对;Ⅲ的内容文章没有提到。
单选题 There have not been many genuine scientific revolutions in the past few decades because
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题问的是在过去的几十年里,没有出现许多真正的科学革命的原因。文章第四段讲到,从20世纪60年代取得成功以来,真正的科学革命已经稀少了;第五段接着讲到,以前的科学家能够取得成功,实现真正的科学革命并不是他们比现在的科学家聪明,这个问题的一个合理得多的解释是——基础科学已经进入一个回报减少的时期。也就是说在过去的几十年里,因为基础科学研究领域的回报减少了,所以才没有出现许多真正的科学革命。
单选题 The term "the Big Bang" probably refers to ______ .
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 文章第四段“Since the triumphs of the 1960s—the genetic code,plate tectonics,and the microwave background radiation that went a long way towards proving the Big Bang—genuine scientific revolutions have been scarce.”从20世纪60年代取得成功以来——基因密码、板块构造说以及成功地证明大爆炸理论的微波背景辐射,真正的科学革命已经稀少了。可见,“the Big Bang”是“宇宙大爆炸”,它是有关宇宙起源的理论,C项符合题意。
单选题 The best title of this passage can be ______ .
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是一道主旨题。纵观全文,文章在第一段中讲到大多数最神秘的东西已经被发现,科学发现的中心已经缩小了。第四段中介绍从20世纪60年代取得成功以来,真正的科学革命已经稀少了。在最后一段中道明了原因:基础科学已经进入一个回报减少的时期。同时在最后一段也指出:有许多重要的东西仍然需要研究,应用科学与工程科学可以永远持续下去。综上我们可以看出,本文主要围绕“真正的科学革命已经稀少了”这个问题来展开的。