单选题 Scot Case was not happy. Vice president of the environmental marketing firm TerraChoice, Case last year sent his researchers into a big retail store to evaluate the green advertising claims of some of the products on its shelves. The results were startling, of the 1,018 products TerraChoice surveyed, all but one failed to live up fully to their green boasts. Words like nontoxic were used in meaninglessly vague ways. Terms like Energy Star certified were in fact not backed up by certification.
Many consumers may not have heard the term greenwashing, but they"ve surely experienced it—misleading marketing about the environmental benefits of a product. Greenwashing isn"t new—ever since the environment emerged as an issue in the early 1970s, there have been advertising firms trying to convince consumers that buying Brand X is the only way to save the earth. But as going green has become big business—sales of organic products alone went from $10 billion in 2003 to more than $20 billion in 2007—companies appear eager to associate themselves with the environment, deservedly or not.
If you"re not yet sick of seeing rotating wind turbines and solar panels on TV, you will be. the new fall season is likely to feature a flood of green advertising. It"s gotten so bad that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has been holding hearings over the past year to define the difference between genuine environmental claims and empty greenwash. It"s not easy—and environmental advocates worry that truly green companies could get lost in all the clamor.
"We have such a challenge ahead of us on climate change," says Kevin Tuerff, a co-founder of the marketing consultancy EnviroMedia. "Greenwashing harms the effort we need to be making."
The first step to cleaning up greenwashing is to identify it, and Tuerff and his partners have hit on an innovative way to direct public attention to particularly bad examples. They"ve launched the Greenwashing Index (www.greenwashingindex.com), a website that allows consumers to post ads that might be examples of greenwashing and rate them on a scale of 1 to 5—1 is a little green lie; 5 is an outright falsehood.
It"s a simple device, but it shows the power of the Internet to trace misleading ads; with a simple Web search, any consumer can find out if a car manufacturer boasting of its fuel-efficient hybrids actually earns the majority of its revenue selling gas-consuming trucks and SUVs. "We try to make it a little more transparent with the index," says Kim Sheehan, a communications professor at the University of Oregon and a co-founder of the site. "It teaches people to be a little more cautious about the claims they hear."
单选题 Why is Scot not happy?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 第一段第二句以后的句子提到了Scot Case不高兴的原因:他们所做的调查证明,绝大多数所谓绿色产品的宣传广告所使用的语言与事实不符。注意:这篇文章并没有说产品本身如何如何,而是说广告中对所谓绿色产品的宣传失真。
单选题 If a product is "greenwashed", ______
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第二段第一句破折号后面部分对greenwashing进行了定义,它指misleading marketing about the environmental benefits of a product。从这个词的构成来看,它指把要出售的东西放在绿色中“洗一洗”,以便使其带上绿色,但其实质无法改变。第一段最后三句实际上举例说明了这种“漂绿”现象。
单选题 One danger in letting greenwashing go without control is that ______
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第三段最后一句提到,如果容忍虚假广告和虚假产品盛行,环保人士担心那些真正环保的公司可能迷失方向(get lost)。根据上下文,这里所谓迷失方向应该指这些公司也效法其他公司,进行鱼目混珠的宣传,不再致力于纯绿色产品的开发和销售。
单选题 What is the purpose of the Greenwashing Index?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 最后一段提到,这个索引的目的是trace misleading ads,即跟踪并找出某个东西或人。实际上,整个最后一段都对设立这个网站的目的进行了说明。
单选题 The author wants to make consumers aware that ______
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 这是全文的主题。文章第一、二段描述了greenwashing现象的产生和盛行,第三、四段提到了它造成的后果,第五、六段提到了制止其蔓延的一种有效方法。