填空题
{{B}}Directions:{{/B}}
In the following article, some sentences
have been removed. For Question 41--45, choose the most suitable one the list
A--G to fit into each of the numbered blank. There are two extra choices, which
do not fit in any of the gaps. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.
Should doctor-assisted suicide ever be a legal option? It
involves the extreme measure of taking the life of a terminally ill patient when
the patient is in extreme pain and the chances for recovery appear to be
hopeless. Those who argue against assisted suicide do so by considering the
roles of the patient, the doctor, and nature in these situations.
Should the patient take an active role in assisted suicide? When a patient
is terminally ill and in great pain, those who oppose assisted suicide say that
it should not be up to that patient to decide what his or her fate will
be.
41 ______.
What role should the doctor have?
Doctors, when taking the Hippocratic oath, swear to preserve life at all costs,
and it is their ethical and legal duty to follow both the spirit and the letter
of this oath. It is their responsibilities to heal the sick, and in the cases
when healing is not possible, then the doctor is obliged to make the dying
person comfortable. Doctors are trained never to hasten death.
42. ______
Doctors are also, by virtue of their humanness,
capable of making mistakes. Doctors could quite possibly say, for instance, that
a cancer patient was terminal, and then the illness could later turn out not to
be so serious. There is always an element of doubt concerning the future outcome
of human affairs.
43. ______
These general
concerns of those who oppose assisted suicide are valid in certain contexts of
the assisted-suicide question. For instance, patients cannot always be certain
of their medical conditions. Pain clouds judgment, and so the patient should not
be the sole arbiter of her or his own destiny. Patients do not usually choose
the course of their medical treatment, so they shouldn't be held completely
responsible for decisions related to it. Doctors are also fallible, and it is
understandable that they would not want to make the final decision about when
death should occur.
44. ______
I believe that
blindly opposing assisted suicide does no one a service. If someone is dying of
cancer and begging to be put out of his or her misery, and someone gives that
person a deadly dose of morphine that seems merciful rather than criminal. If we
can agree to this, then I think we could also agree that having a doctor close
by measuring the dosage and advising the family and friends is a reasonable
request.
45. ______
Life is indeed precious, but
an inevitable part of life is death, and it should be precious, too. If life has
become an intolerable pain and intense suffering, then it seems that in order to
preserve dignity and beauty, one should have the right to end her or his
suffering quietly, surely, and with family and friends nearby.
[A] If one simply withholds treatment, it may take the patient longer to
die, and so he may suffer more than he would if more direct action were taken
and a lethal injection given.
[B] The third perspective to
consider when thinking about assisted suicide is the role of nature. Life is
precious. Many people believe that it is not up to human beings to decide when
to end their own or another's life. Only nature determines when it is the right
time for a person to die. To assist someone in suicide is not only to break
criminal laws, but to break divine laws as well.
[C] Since
doctors are trained to prolong life, they usually do not elect to take it by
prescribing assisted suicide.
[D] There are greater powers at
work that determine when a person dies, for example, nature. Neither science nor
personal preference should take precedence over these larger forces.
[E] Without the doctor’s previous treatment, the person would surely be
dead already. Doctors have intervened for months or even years, so why not
sanction this final, merciful intervention?
[F] There is no
single, objectively correct answer for everyone as to when, if at all, one’s
life becomes all things considered a burden and unwanted. If self-determination
is a fundamental value, then the great variability among people on this question
makes it especially important that individuals control the manner,
circumstances, and timing of their death and dying.
[G] Those
who oppose assisted suicide believe that doctors who do help terminally ill
patients die are committing a crime, and they should be dealt with
accordingly.