单选题 It seemed so promising—mirrors sprawled across desert land in the scorching southwest delivering clean electricity and helping Americans out of the increasing fuel crisis. Some scientists and industry developers claim that Nevada's empty and sun-drenched expanses alone could supply enough electricity to power the entire country.
Now even the optimists fear this wonderful prospect may be a mirage. Congress cannot make up their mind to extend the tax-reducing bill for solar-energy projects, which solar advocates say is critical to the future of their industry but which is due to expire at the end of the year. The latest attempt failed in the Senate earlier this month, prospects for a deal before November's presidential and congressional elections now look dim. Uncertainty has led some investors to delay or abandon projects in the past few months. Rhone Resch, the president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said if the tax-reducing bill is allowed to expire at the end of the year, "it will result in the loss of billions of dollars in new investments in solar. "
Further dampening hopes for a big solar-energy boom, the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has abruptly suspended new applications to put solar collectors on federal land. The agency says it has received more than 130 applications and needs to conduct a region-wide environmental impact study on the industry before it will accept any more. The study will take 22 months to complete, however. Few argue against trying to preserve precious water sources and protect desert tortoises and other creatures that might not enjoy cohabiting with sprawling fields of mirrors. But many solar advocates wonder why the government is not acting as cautiously when it comes to drilling for oil and gas.
Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington State, wants a congressional probe into the proposed suspension. "The fact that the BLM pops this out without people even knowing about it, especially when solar thermal looks extremely promising as a power source, is not right," she says. Harry Reid of Nevada, who is the majority leader in the Senate, also condemns the BLM's freeze, saying that it could "slow new development to a crawl".
The BLM is not without its supporters, however. At a public meeting on June 23rd in Golden, Colorado, Alex Daue, of the Wilderness Society, said that his organization supports renewable energy development as long as it doesn't damage other important resources. The message is clear: no rubber stamps, even for renewable energy.

单选题 "mirrors sprawled across desert land" is mentioned to______.
[A] show the technology of solar energy
[B] spotlight the high technology in the United States
[C] introduce the prospect of solar energy
[D] explain how to make use of Nevada's empty and sun-drenched expanses
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点] 主旨大意
[解析]例子本身是为了文章中心服务,因此一般仅仅局限于例子本身的答案往往都不是正确答案。联系上下文,第二段第一句就否定了第一段描述场景的可能性,指出这不过是海市蜃楼。第二段和第三段分别列出了太阳能遭受的两个打击:免税法案无法延期、国土管理局暂停受理新的太阳能计划。文章的最后两段提出了针对太阳能的两种观点或者说态度。从而我们可以判断出文章的中心是太阳能的发展前景。另外,从篇章连贯来说,在对事例做总结的第二段中,“prospect”(前景)一词出现了两次,也能给我们一定启迪。因此正确答案是选项C。
[干扰项分析] 选项B、D很容易被排除,这两个选项都仅仅局限于例子本身,没有抽象上升到一定高度。而且,后面几段根本既没有提到美国的高科技,也没有提到内华达州的沙漠。倘若选项A是正确选项,那么文章的核心就应当是太阳能技术本身。然而从下文我们可以看出,文章没有详细论述太阳能技术是如何操作或运用,而是把太阳能技术始终作为一个整体,讨论其前景。因此,选项A没有正确反映文章的中心思想,不是正确答案。
单选题 The word "mirage" (Line 1, Paragraph 2) most probably means______.
[A] insight [B] craze [C] vision [D] prospect
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点] 词汇短语
[解析]考查的单词位于第二段第一句话。第二段的第一句话是对上文提到的未来场景做出评价。而本段余下的句子都在讲一件事,那就是对太阳能项目至关重要的免税法案即将过期,而该法案被批准延长的可能性又很小,因此对发展太阳能项目非常不利。也就是说,后面讲的都是对太阳能发展前景的悲观看法。因此我们可以认定第一句也是表达不乐观的态度,选项C正好符合题意。原文中的mirage一词,意思是“海市蜃楼”。
其实本题还有一个非常重要的词汇线索:even。原句是:Now even the optimists fear this wonderful prospect may be a mirage(即使乐观的人也会认为这个美妙的场景是mirage)。其中even(即使)一词是让步之意,充分说明mirage要表达的意思跟optimists、wonderful是相反的。
[干扰项分析] 除了B选项意思差别较大之外,剩下三个选项都与视力、景象有关。A项强调的是对某一问题认识的程度比较深入,换言之强调认清局势或问题。D项当名词意思是“前途、景色”,当动词意思是“寻找、勘探”。
单选题 According to Senator Maria Cantwell,______.
[A] the BLM should suspend new applications to put solar collectors on federal land
[B] the BLM should not suspend new applications to put solar collectors on federal land
[C] the congress should decide whether to suspend new applications or not
[D] the congress should send experts to help the BLM to make decisions
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 事实细节
[解析] Senator.Maria Cantwell出现在第四段,而就在这一段同时还出现了另一个人Harry Reid。他们两个人的评论出现在同一段,而且两段评论之间没有出现任何连词,一个说完,另一个接着说,那充分说明俩人的观点应当是相近或相同的。而后一人Harry Reid认为这种做法会让发展变缓,也就是说不赞成BLM的做法,因此反推前一人Maria Cantewell的话也应当是这个意思。从上文我们已经得知BLM中止了受理申请,该短语又以out结尾,因此我们可以大概猜出该短语的意思倾向于消极,意思可能是“让……出局”之类的意思。原文that引导同位语修饰the fact,句子主干很简单,就是“the fact is not right”。而所谓fact就是上文提到BLM中止受理申请这件事,既然这种做法不对,那么言下之意就是BLM不该中止受理申请。
[干扰项分析] 选项A、B意思相反,若能推导出B,A自然就排除了。选项C具有干扰性,因为前面有一句wants a congressional probe into the proposed suspension,但希望国会调查的目的正是对BLM的做法不赞同,希望国会给BLM压力停止这种做法。原文并未提及要求把决定权从BLM转到国会,选项C属于典型的对原文过度阐释。选项D具有干扰性,主要是对without people even knowing about it的理解。倘若把这句话理解为BLM中无人理解,那么很多考生就容易想到,既然没有理解,那就需要能够理解的人,因此需要专家。而事实上,原文的without people even knowing about it是说广大群众还没明白怎么回事。即使是认为BLM中无人理解太阳能项目,选项D也属于盲目扩大原文意思,因为原文没有提及派专家,更没提到要国会派人。
单选题 What does the last sentence of the text mean?
[A] Even the project of renewable energy should not be granted.
[B] Even the project of renewable energy should not produce wastes.
[C] Even the project of renewable energy should not pollute the environment.
[D] Even the project of renewable energy should not be suspended.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[考点] 事实细节
[解析]本文的结构很明显,第一段是现象,第二、三段是问题(太阳能遭受打击),第四段是支持的观点,第五段是反对的观点。从结构上说,本文的最后一句,不可能是整篇文章的中心思想的总结。因为如果文章要作总结,那么必定是分别论述支持和反对的两种观点之后,另起一段,表明作者的态度,总结全文。因此,本文的最后一句话只有可能是最后一段的总结。最后一段第一句话出现了however,表明与第四段支持太阳能发展的观点是相反的。另外The BLM is not without its supporters(BLM也不乏支持者),也表明了后面的观点是与BLM一致的,BLM通过暂停受理申请,明显限制了太阳能的发展,支持BLM就意味着希望限制太阳能的发展。只有选项A表明了这个意思,因此是正确选项。rubber stamps是橡皮刻的图章,也就是我们中国人常说的公章。最后一句话是说,即使是再生能源(太阳能)也不能盖公章,也就是说不应当支持。
[干扰项分析] 最后一段的第一句表明了“BLM不乏支持者”,这已经说明了本段主要是论述反对太阳能的观点。而选项D属于支持太阳能的观点,显然不符合最后一段的语境。选项B、C意义相近,再生能源不应制造垃圾、破坏环境。本段乃至本文都没有详细论述制造垃圾跟破坏环境有何区别。换言之,B、C的意思在本文并未加以区分,选B就能选C,因此可以排除。
单选题 Which of the following titles is closest to the message the text tries to convey?
[A] Renewable Energy
[B] A heavy Blow for Solar Energy
[C] Environment and Solar Energy
[D] Do We Need Solar Energy?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 主旨大意
[解析] 本文由一幅未来场景引出问题,即太阳能面临挑战,随后分别论述了正反观点。作者在论述完两种观点之后,并未明确给出自己的观点,甚至未做出总结,这就充分说明本文的重点不在于正反观点,而在于论述事实,即问题才是本文的核心。另外从篇幅上我们也可以看出一些端倪:本文一共五段,而对问题的论述就占了两段,第一段的引子也是为问题的提出作铺垫,这样算起来就共三段,足以说明本文的重点在于论述问题。第二段论述了太阳能免税法案无法延长,第三段论述了BLM中止了受理太阳能项目申请。所以全文的核心都是围绕太阳能遭受的打击,选项B正好表达了这个意思,因此是正确答案。
[干扰项分析] 文章中的renewable energy(再生能源)实际上就是指太阳能,但文章并未就太阳能的具体运用和操作细节做出说明,其后的正方观点也不是围绕太阳能技术的具体细节展开,因此文章的中心并非太阳能本身,选项A应该排除。文章中反方观点提到,反对太阳能的主要原因是环境因素。但这只是文章最后一段论述的一个因素而已,而非全文的核心,倘若全文核心是太阳能与环境之间的关系,那么文章至少需要简要论述太阳能如何影响了环境,或者说太阳能带来的环保危机,而这些在文中都未具体提及。因此选项C属于典型的意义扩大型干扰项,也就是把文章中论述的某一个细节扩大为文章的中心。做主旨题时,考生应切记,题目是问文章的中心思想,而不是问下列哪些内容在文中提到了。选项D是最容易排除的干扰项,因为正反双方并未就我们是否需要太阳能展开讨论,而且从第一段的例子以及反方只要不污染就支持的观点,我们都可以看出对于太阳能的优点,大家认识都很充分。太阳能可以缓解能源危机,这不是争论的焦点,对于太阳能影响环境才是反方的理由,所以选项D可以排除。