The longitudinal study demonstrates that students who receive ESL (English as a sec ond language) instruction are far better than those taught primarily in their native lan guage. A comparison of the three-year exit rates for students in ESL and bilingual programs shows that those who receive ESL instruction test out faster and in higher percentages than those who receive instruction in their native language, regardless of the grade in which they entered school. For example, 79.3 percent of the children who entered ESL programs in kindergarten tested out, while only 51.5 percent of those who received their education in their native languages did. Likewise, 72.9 percent of the LEP (limited English profi ciency) students who entered programs in the first grade tested out. while only 38.5 of those in bilingual programs did. For students who entered LEP programs in the ninth grade, 91.6 percent of those in native-language instruction classes still hadn't tested out after three years, as compared with 78.1 percent of those in ESL classes. Furthermore, children who had been in ESL classes tested 4 higher in English and math once they exited LEP programs than those who had received native-language instruc tion. Of the LEP students who entered in kindergarten or the first grade, 49 percent of those who had been in ESL classes eventually read at grade level, while only 32 percent of those who had been in bilingual classes performed that well. In math. the statistics are even more impressive. Of the children who entered in kindergarten or the first grade, more than 69 percent of those who had been in ESL classes eventually performed at grade level or above, as opposed to 54 percent of those who had been in bilingual classes. Naturally, the study provoked a barrage of criticism from the highly political and vo cal bilingual lobby, which prompted the New York City Board of Education to issue a pa per in November 1994 mitigating the findings of the study and ignoring the distinction be tween students in ESL and bilingual education programs. Rather than exit rates, this paper focuses on the achievement of LEP students during the period in which they are in bilingual or ESL classes. The authors show that although the scores of LEP students were below av erage on the English-language test, their scores in all areas showed improvement; they point out that in math, there were insufficient data on the progress of LEP students to draw valid conclusions. However, a report on citywide mathematics test results in New York in the spring of 1995 deals more fully with the math scores of the 26,248 students who were examined the previous school year in Chinese, Spanish, or Haitian Creole. According to this document, only 16.6 percent of these children performing at or above grade level in mathemat ics. Although this represents an improvement of 1.1 percent over the scores of the previous year, it discredits the argument that native-language instruction keeps performing at grade level in subject areas. Although LEP students are improving faster than the national norm, they continue to perform far below the norm.
单选题
This text is mainly______.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】[解析] 文章主旨题。解题点散布在文章各段。文章提到“The longitudinal study demonstrates that students who receive ESL (English as a second language)instruction are far better than those taught primarily in their native ianguage.”,“Likewise,72.9 per cent of the LEP(Limited English proficiency)students…”以及“Furthermore,children who had been in ESL classes tested 4 higher in English and math once they exited LEP pro grams than those who had received native-language instruction.”。文章主要讨论了LEP、双语以及ESL教学的问题,所以正确答案是A。
单选题
From Paragraph 1 we learn that______.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题。解题点在第一段第二句。文章提到“…those who receive ESL in- struction test out faster and in higher percentages than those who receive instruction in their native language…”,该句的意思和选项A所提到的“ESL instruction could test students faster than LEP instruction”是一致的,因此正确答案是A。
单选题
The author believes (Par
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题。解题点在第二段第一句。根据原文“children who had been in ESL classes tested 4 higher in English”可知A正确;对于B选项,文章未提及双语教学使那 些数学成绩好的学生不及格;对于C选项,文章原文说的是the statistics are even more impressive,而不是more credible;对于D选项,文章说的是有54%的学生performed at grade level or above,而不是exiting from grade level。所以正确答案是A。
单选题
It can be inferred that the paper mentioned in Paragraph 4______.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[解析] 推断。解题点在第三段第一句。即“ignoring the distinction between students in ESL and bilingual education programs”,意思是忽略了学生的不同之处。B选项 dimmed the differences between students in different programs的意思与此相同,只是把 ignore替换成了dim。因此,正确答案是B。
单选题
According to the NY 1995 report, it is unbelievable that______.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[解析] 推理题。解题点在文章第三段最后一句。原文“…there were insufficient data on the progress of LEP students to draw valid conclusions.”的意思是没有充分的数据来证明their scores in all areas showed improvement这个结论。所以正确答案是B。