When and how much? Those are the questions on the lips of investors, bondholders, and other Federal Reserve watchers. The Fed kept interest rates on hold at its Mar. 19 meeting. But the accompanying statement, in which the Fed abandoned its view that economic weakness was the greatest risk in the outlook, makes it clear that policymakers are thinking about the timing of rate hikes in order to bring monetary policy back to a neutral stance. Even so, there are other factors that argue for some rise in short-term rates—perhaps as early as June, as Wall Street expects. While the Fed"s words lessen the chances of a rate hike at the May meeting, they do not set the criteria for a possible hike at the June 25-26 meeting. The latest data seem to come down on the "evenly mixed" scenario. Businesses are backing off from last year"s feverish pace of stock-cutting, but domestic demand is holding up. Factories are busier in response to rising orders. In particular, the makers of tech equipment are boosting output at a rapid clip. At the same time, the wider trade gap in January suggests that some of the inventory swing is benefiting foreign producers. Keep in mind that a bigger trade gap subtracts from economic growth, but a rise in U.S. imports is necessary to give rise to a global rebound. That will eventually boost exports as well and help to better align monetary policy around the world. The Fed"s decision to shift to a neutral stance was probably made easier by the latest good news on industrial production. Output at factories, utilities, and mines increased 0.4% in February on top of a 0.2% January gain, which was first reported as a 0.1% loss. Manufacturing output rose 0.3% in each month, the best showing since mid-2000. Surprisingly, the long-ailing tech sector is leading the charge. Tech production is growing at a double-digit annual rate in the first quarter, vs. almost no gain in the rest of manufacturing. But even that small rise in nontech manufacturing is a vast improvement from the steep declines of the previous six quarters. Just as tech is fueling the rebound in U.S. factory activity, tech imports are leading the import rise. Incoming shipments of tech goods jumped 14.6% in January, suggesting stronger capital spending. As demand picks up, the Fed will want to remove itself from the equation of economic pluses and minuses. Step One was the shift in its view of the outlook. Step Two will be a series of rate hikes that will bring policy more in line with sustainable economic growth.
单选题 According to the author, the American economy
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"根据作者的谈论,美国经济…"。作者认为,美国经济"比联邦银行所想象的要好的多"。而选项"不可能达到持续的增长","达到最弱的一点"以及"已经完全恢复了"皆不是美国经济的现状,不符合题意。
单选题 The strong tone of US economic recovery is manifested in
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"美国经济复苏的强烈动态反映在…"。根据原文第2、3、4自然段,美国经济复苏的强烈动态在"技术行业生产的大量增加"方面有所反映。而选项"制造行业的大量裁员","信息技术产品的进口货运"以及"一月份不断增加的贸易差额"皆不符合题意。
单选题 As pointed out in Paragraph 3, the "evenly mixed" scenario
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"第3自然段作者提出的evenly mixed 忧喜参半的情形,为的是…"。作者虽然在第3自提过 "evenly mixed",但是第4自然段才是描述美国真实的经济状态的,所以第3自然段的"evenly mixed""不能反映美国真实的经济状态"。而选项"导致全球性的反弹是完全必要的","清楚地表明联邦已经改变他们的观点"以及"没有满足企业家的期望"皆不符合题意。
单选题 Which of the following is NOT mentioned in the passage?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"下列在文中没有提到的是…"。选项"美国的经济从急剧的下降慢慢地复苏了","联邦银行应该考虑改变他们在经济方面的观点"以及"联邦银行有必要对经济政策做出调整"在原文中都有提及,而选项"联邦银行考虑增加利率不是个恰当的事件"与原文意思相反,原文中作者认为这是个恰当的事件,所以不符合题意。
单选题 The purpose of the author in writing this passage is to urge the Fed
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"作者写作本文的目的是敦促联邦银行…"。本文的中心是关于银行对利率的提高的问题,所以作者写作本文的目的是敦促联邦银行"考虑利率的增加",答案选项表达了此意。而选项"倾向于更严格的政策","对技术行业进行投资"以及"放弃中间的立场"皆不符合题意。