Fiercely independent, 90 year-old Vincenzia Rinaldi wouldn"t consider a home health aide or nursing home. So Louis Critelli, her nephew had to coax the widowed homemaker into assisted living, the nation"s growing long-term care option for the elderly. For $1,100 a month, Rinaldi became the reluctant resident of an efficiency unit where she could still simmer her much-loved tomato sauce and where caregivers would make sure she took her pills. Instead, 30 months later, she died. Not because she was old. But because aides at her new home, Loretto Utica Center, one of the modern, hotel-style facilities that have sprouted across the country over the past decade, mistakenly gave her another resident"s prescription medication. That error led to her death, state inspectors concluded. Neither the state nor Loretto told her nephew about the cause of death. Critelli, thinking his aunt had been properly eared for, only learned of the finding years later from USA TODAY. "When they find something blatant like that, you"d think they"d tell the family," the shaken nephew told a reporter after a long pause. A USA TODAY investigation shows that Rinaldi"s death represents the tragic extreme in a pattern of mistakes and violations that lead to scores of injuries and occasional deaths among the estimated 1 million elderly residents of assisted living facilities. The centers are the state-regulated, largely private-pay residences that help seniors with medication and other activities of daily life. In a wide-ranging analysis, USA TODAY reviewed two years of inspection records within 2000-02 for more than 5,300 assisted living facilities in seven states: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, New York and Texas. The precise time period varied slightly from state to state. The analysis covered a broad range—from mom-and-pop facilities with just a few residents to corporate-run centers with scores of beds and many levels of care. It is the first time such data have been gathered and analyzed across so many states. The review included less-detailed data from five other states and focused on broad quality-of-care categories to compensate for variations in regulations from state to state. As affluent and middle-class Americans cope with the infirmities of age, many turn to assisted living as an alternative to a nursing home industry that has been periodically plagued by abuse or neglect scandals. Even though assisted living facilities generally don"t provide 24-hour skilled medical care, they increasingly serve seniors who only a decade ago might have been in nursing homes.
单选题 The first paragraph implies that
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:这是一道暗示题,难度很大。段一首句"具有强烈的独立意识,Rinaldi不会考虑…",暗示护理院中一切均由院方护理员安排决定,老人们不便做主。说非常满意过于绝对,"Rinaldi很了解情况,不愿跟护理员一起住到高效服务单位去"与文章意思不合,误选的可能是选项中相关短语误解所致。
单选题 Critelli"s response to the real cause of her aunt"s death was
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:这是一道细节题。依据第三段末可知,Critelli对姨妈死亡的原因感到震惊和愤懑,故此答案为"气愤"。"不信"是对题干的误解,对于真正的死亡原因怎么可能不相信呢,只能是对养老院编造的原因才可能不相信;说"强烈",却没有说清楚什么感觉强烈,因此应排除。
单选题 The author mentioned Rinaldi"s death in the text in order to
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:本题问作者文中提到Rinaldi之死的意图是什么。文章一至三段讲Rinaldi的事情无非是作为引子,引出第四段所要谈论的全文核心:养老机构所存在的问题。"说明护理人员的低效"最多是文章中的局部细节,绝非作者讲述Rinaldi之死的意图,故排除。其它选项也非作者的真正意图。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:这是一道推论题。依据第五段第四句"这次分析涉及范围很宽—从只有几位居住者的夫妻店面到以公司性质经营的拥有几十张床位、许多护理级别的中心,也是第一次跨越那么多州收集并分析这些资料"可以推论"12.2前对调查材料的分析只涉及有限的地区"。选项"助理生活设施大多是国营的住处"与第四段末句(这些中心都是由国家监管的大型私营居住设施)内容不符;选项"《今日美国报》进行了美国国内第一次对养老机构的调查"是不对的,文章只是说《今日美国报》第一次对调查好了的材料进行分析,故排除。
单选题 We learn from the text that
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:这也是一道细节题。依据最后一段可以得出结论:许多收入高的老年人往往视"有助生活"为第一选择。