单选题 Text 2 Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) has launched a new public awareness campaign aimed at Canadian Justice Minister Irwin Cotler. "Enough is Enough" advocates dropping the Criminal Code's blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit from 0.08 to 0.05 percent, to "protect innocent drivers on our roads. "MADD Canada CEO Andrew Murie thinks that lowering the BAC limit could result in a 6-to-18 percent reduction in crash deaths. But questions have been raised about the science behind that campaign. MADD selectively cites a report published in 2002 by Robert Mann of the Mental Health Centre. Mann, in turn, had got those numbers from two separate studies whose data was selected from Sweden and Australia. The conclusions in Mann's report seem to ignore the Swedish authors' numerous warnings and cautions, as well as the limitations in the Australian study. First, the Australian study examined the effectiveness of breath testing, not lowered BAC levels, on fatal traffic crashes. Also, that research was started in 1976 when "liquid lunches" were far more common. What's more, the Australian data varied: whereas the state of Queensland saw the 18 percent decline in fatal accidents cited by MADD's Murie, in neighboring New South Wales, fatal accidents decreased just 8 percent. It is also reported by the Ontario Community Council that the majority of drivers in alcohol-related fatal crashes are repeat offenders with BACs over 0.15 percent—meaning that the problem is drivers who repeatedly get behind the wheel with BAC levels twice the legal limit, not social drinkers who consume a glass of wine or two. This makes MADD's concern seem wasteful, given the downward trend in alcohol-related traffic deaths. The Canada Safety Council, the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators and the Traffic Injury Research Foundation take issue with MADD's campaign. Even the Ontario Community Council has determined that lowering the BAC would mean more work for police and the courts. But to MADD's Murie, the math question is simple: "If you lower BAC limits, regardless to what level, you'll save Canadian lives. "Unfortunately, the math doesn't quite add up.
单选题 MADD launched a public awareness campaign in order to ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。根据第一段第二句“'Enough is Enough' advocates dropping the Criminal Code's blood alcohol concentration(BAC)limit from 0.08 to 0.05 percent...”可知,“适可而止”运动主要目的是为了降低血液酒精浓度限制,可知这样做的目的是为了限制司机对酒精的摄取,故选C。
单选题 From the text we learn that MADD cites a report that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节题。根据第二段第一、二句“MADD selectively cites a report published in 2002 by Robert Mann...from two separate studies whose data was selected from Sweden and Australia.”可知,反对醉驾母亲协会引用的是罗伯特?曼发表的内容,而罗伯特?曼所获得的数据信息来源于瑞典和澳大利亚两个不同研究,由此可知,反对醉驾母亲协会所引用的内容在其他两篇报道中提到过,故选D
单选题 It is implied in the text that Mann's report is unreliable because______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节题。根据第二段第三句“The conclusions in Mann's report seem to ignore the Swedish authors' numerous warnings and cautions, as well as the limitations in the Australian study”可知,之所以曼的报道不可信是因为报道中忽略了所引用研究中的不足,故选D。
单选题 The text indicates that MADD's campaign ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】 推理题。根据文中第三段内容可知,交通事故发生主要是开车司机血液酒精浓度含量超标,而不是普通人喝了酒会引发交通事故,因此反对醉驾母亲协会的担心是多余的,推知其倡导的运动有可能就毫无意义了,故选B。
单选题 The writer's attitude towards the campaign is ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】作者观点题。根据全文作者对这项运动提出的一些列问题及文章最后一段作者表达出文中所提出的计算方法根本加不到一块,可知作者对此事持有怀疑的态度,故选C。