单选题 When the vote was finally taken, it was 3:45 in the morning, After six months of arguing and the final 16 hours of hot parliamentary debates, Australia's Northern Territory became the first legal authority in the world to allow doctors to take the lives of incurably ill patients who wished to die. The measure was passed by the convincing vote of 15 to 10. Almost at the same time word flashed on the Internet and was picked up, half a world away, by John Hofsess, executive director of the Right to Die Society of Canada. He sent it on through the group's on-line service, Death Net. Hofsess said: "We posted bulletins all day long, because of course this isn't just something that happened in Australia. It's world history."
The full import may take a while to sink in. The NT Rights of the Terminally Ill law has left physicians and citizens alike trying to deal with its moral and practical implications. Some have breathed sighs of relief; others, including churches, right-to, live groups and the Australian Medical Association, bitterly attacked the bill and the haste of its passage. But the tide is unlikely to turn back. In Australia—where an aging population, life-extending technology and changing community attitudes have all played their part—other states are going to consider making a similar law to deal with euthanasia. In America and Canada, where the right-to-die movement is gathering strength, observers are waiting for the dominoes to start failing.
Under the new Northern Territory law, an adult patient can request death—probably by a deadly injection or pill—to put an end to suffering. The patient must be diagnosed as terminally ill by two doctors. After a "cooling off" period of seven days, the patient can sign a certificate of request. 48 hours later, the wish for death can be met. For Lloyd Nickson, a 54-year-old Darwin resident suffering from lung cancer, the NT Rights of the Terminally Ill law means he can get on with living without the haunting fear of his suffering: a terrifying death from his breathing condition. "I'm not afraid of dying from a spiritual point of view, but what I am afraid of is how I'd go, because I've watched people die in the hospital fighting for oxygen and clawing at their masks." he says.
单选题 From the second paragraph we learn that ______.
  • A. the objection to euthanasia is diminishing in some countries
  • B. physicians and citizens have the same view on euthanasia
  • C. technological changes are chiefly responsible for the new law
  • D. it takes time to appreciate the significance of laws passed
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:文章第二段提到了人们对法律同意安乐死这件事做出了褒贬不一的反应。由此可知,要认识到法律的重要性还需要时间。
单选题 By saying that "observers are waiting for the dominoes to start falling", the author means that ______.
  • A. observers are taking a wait-and-see attitude towards the future of euthanasia
  • B. there is a possibility of similar bills being passed in the U.S. and Canada
  • C. observers are waiting to see the movement end up in failure
  • D. the process of the bill taking effect may Finally come to a stop
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:观察家们等着看多米诺骨牌效应,即一个国家通过了允许安乐死的法律,其他国家也相继效仿。
单选题 When Lloyd Nickson is close to death, he will ______.
  • A. undergo a cooling off period of seven days
  • B. experience the suffering of a lung cancer patient
  • C. have an intense fear of terrible suffering
  • D. face his death with the calm characteristic of euthanasia
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:由文章可知,有了安乐死,劳埃德·尼克森就不会害怕临死时会呼吸困难,饱受痛苦了,他可以安安静静地死去。
单选题 What is the author's attitude towards euthanasia?
  • A. Hostile.
  • B. Suspicious.
  • C. Approving.
  • D. Indifferent.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:由文章可推知,作者对安乐死的态度应是赞同的。
单选题 We can infer from the text that the author believes the success of the right-to-die movement is ______.
  • A. only a matter of time
  • B. far from certain
  • C. just an illusion
  • D. a shattered hope
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:由文章可知,在这场安乐死运动中,其他国家也通过了类似法律,这成了一种趋势,所以只是一个时间问题。