阅读理解 It''s hardly news that the immigration system is a mess. Foreign nationals have long been slipping across the border with fake papers, and visitors who arrive in the U. S. legitimately often overstay their legal welcome without being punished. But since Sept 11, it''s become clear that terrorists have been shrewdly factoring the weaknesses of our system into their plans. In addition to their mastery of forging passports, at least three of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers (劫机者) were here on expired visas. That''s been a safe bet until now. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (移民归化局) lacks the resources, and apparently the inclination, to keep track of the estimated 4 million foreigners who have intentionally overstayed their welcome. But this laxness (马虎) toward immigration fraud may be about to change. Congress has already taken some modest steps. The U. S. A. Patriot Act, passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 tragedy , requires the FBI, the Justice Department, the State Department and the INS to share more data, which will make it easier to stop watch-listed terrorists at the border. But what have really needed, critics say, is even tougher laws and more resources aimed at tightening up border security. Reformers are calling for a rollback of rules that hinder law enforcement. They also want the INS to hire hundreds more border patrol agents and investigators to keep illegal immigrants out and to track them down once they''re here. Reformers also want to see the INS set up a database to monitor whether visa holders actually leave the country when they are required to. All these proposed changes were part of a new border-security bill that passed the House of Representatives but died in the Senate last week. Before Sept. 11, legislation of this kind had been blocked by two powerful lobbies; universities, which rely on tuition from foreign students who could be kept out by the new law, and business, which relies on foreigners for cheap labor. Since the attacks, they''ve backed off. The bill would have passed this time but for congressional maneuverings and is expected to be reintroduced and to pass next year. Also on the agenda for next year; a proposal, backed by some influential law-makers, to split the INS into two agencies—a good cop that would tend to service functions like processing citizenship papers and a bad cop that would concentrate on border inspections, deportation and other functions. One reason for the division, supporters say, is that the INS has in recent years become too focused on serving tourists and immigrants. After the Sept. 11 tragedy, the INS should pay more attention to serving the millions of ordinary Americans who rely on the nation''s border security to protect them from terrorist attacks.
单选题 Terrorists have obviously taken advantage of________
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】本题是一道细节题。参看文章第一段的中间“But since Sept.11,it''s become clear that terrorists have been shrewdly factoring the weaknesses of our system into their plans”因为我们系统的弱点给恐怖分子以可乘之机。 A.法律给外国人的优惠权。 B.美国人过度的热情。 C.官员对边界检查不负责任的态度。 D.移民局服务的低效率。与原文的意思一致。
单选题 We learn from the passage that coordinated efforts will be made by various U. S. government agencies to________
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】本题是一道推理题。做此类型的题最好用排除法。通读全文,就会发现文章在说因为移民局的低效,所以只有多个部门之间的协调合作才能打击非法移民。 A.拒绝续签过期的签证。 B.在边界就截住嫌疑恐怖分子。与原文的意思一致。 C.制止外国移民文件的传人。 D.限制到美国的移民数量。
单选题 It can be inferred from the passage that before Sept. 11, aliens with expired visas________
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】本题是一道推理题。参看第一段的末句“In addition to their mastery of forging passports,at least three of the 19 Sept.11 hijackers(劫机者)were here on expired visas”由此可知,签证过期的恐怖分子发动恐怖袭击。 A.可以使签证过期,但仍然没有麻烦。与原文的意思一致。 B.可能被FBI部门看管起来。 C.他们愿意呆多长,他们就呆多长。 D.生活在害怕被驱逐出境的担心之中。
单选题 It is believed by many that all these years the INS________
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】本题是一道细节题。参看文章最后一段“One reason for the division,supporters say,is that the INS has in recent years become too focused on serving tourists and immigrants.” A.有两种相互矛盾的功能。 B.不带有任何偏见性地,很开明地把签证发给旅游者和移民。 C.总是过多强调它的服务功能而忽视了国家的安全。与原文的意思一致。 D.已经忽略了两个政党的要求。
单选题 Before Sept 11, the U. S. Congress had been unable to pass stricter immigration laws because ________
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】本题是一道细节题。参看文章第四段的中间“Before Sept.11,legislation of this kind had been blocked by two powerful lobbies:universities,which rely on tuition from foreign students who could be kept out by the new law,and business,which relies on foreigners for cheap labor”说明移民政策的修改不能够保护大学生和廉价劳动力的利益。 A.他们远离大学生和廉价劳动力的利益。在原文中可以找到依据。 B.议会成员的努力很难协调起来。 C.教育和商业部门很少关心国家。 D.资源不能够满足他们政策的执行。 B,C,D三项都在原文中找不到依据。