问答题
2. Since the foundation of the Capital Library Alliance in Beijing, 34 university libraries, including libraries of the prestigious Peking University and Tsinghua University, will be gradually open to the public. Some applaud the decision while others express their worries. The followings are opinions on whether university libraries should be open to the public. Read them carefully and write an article of NO LESS THAN 300 words, in which you should: 1. summarize briefly the arguments on both sides;
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. Write your article on ANSWER SHEET FOUR. Zheng Xinrong (Beijing Morning Post): If resources in university libraries are not fully utilized, it will be a big waste. Some people worry that free entry to these libraries will lead to overcrowded libraries on campus, but this is not certain. Maybe not a single outsider would visit University libraries.
Nowadays, fewer and fewer people in China are interested in reading books. For example, you can always see many people playing games on their cellphones, instead of reading. Thus, opening university libraries to the public is actually a way to encourage more people to pick up books.
Generally speaking, outside readers usually choose libraries near their home and seldom go to a distant university library unless they have special need. Based on this fact, I believe university libraries will not necessarily become overcrowded even if they offer free access. Mostly, the beneficiaries of the free entry policy will be nearby residents.
Libraries should first meet students' and teachers' demand for books. If a book is already preordered by some student or teacher, it should not be lent to outsiders. Books that are not borrowed frequently by students and teachers should be brought into circulation. Doors can be closed to outsiders during the period when students are preparing for exams.
Xiong Bingqi (The Beijing News): It's great for university libraries to offer free entry to the public. But at the same time, it will make the management work more difficult and the limited book and space resources in university libraries might be further squeezed. Only depending on universities and the government will not ensure the sustainable development of the free entry policy. Therefore, it's necessary to absorb some social institutions and welfare organizations. For example, it's a good idea to set up a community club that brings together resources of nearby universities and even middle schools. Local residents can use these resources as long as they pay a small sum of money to be members of this club. Community residents should also have the opportunity to serve as volunteers in university libraries.
Gao Dali (www.enorth.com.cn): To offer the public free entry into university libraries is now a mainstream idea. The question now is how to realize the openness. Nowadays, libraries' resources are kept in the form of databases. The traditional way of borrowing and lending books needs manpower and capital input. I think the most effective way is to open these databases to the public.
Jia Ximing (www.enorth.com.cn): Although universities' opening their libraries to the public is a trend, the target readers of these libraries are students and teachers on the campus. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Xi'an University in Shaanxi Province once adopted the practice of opening to the public and even tried very hard to persuade nearby residents to come to read. But the practice was later suspended, because the library was unable to meet readers' demands as the university's books were mostly prepared for teaching and academic research. In addition, the library was unable to receive too many visits. After all, school library's priority is to meet students' and teachers' demand and ensure the order of campus.
【正确答案】[范文] On University Libraries Being Opened to the Public
Currently, offering the public free entry into university libraries has become a trend, which has sparked a heated debate. Some people hail it as a marvelous idea that not only allows university resources to be fully utilized, but also encourages more people to retrieve the habit of reading. Meanwhile, many express their doubts, concerning the act will bring difficulty to the management work and take up the limited resources that should be preferentially offered to university students and staff. In my view, it's advisable that university libraries be opened to the public.
To start with, the most obvious benefit of the idea is that it enables the resources of university libraries to get maximum utilization. University libraries boast a huge reservoir of resources. Even with large numbers of students and staff frequenting the libraries, only a limited part of the resources gets utilized, with materials of rare fields left largely unread. Therefore, the entry of the public, including people from all walks of life, can bring the resources into full use.
Next, the policy contributes to cultivating a cultural atmosphere in the society. It's universally acknowledged that reading is occupying an increasingly small place in people's life. Providing the public with a more convenient and less costly access to profuse intellectual resources is beneficial for reversing the situation.
Moreover, the public's entry into university libraries gives students a chance of interacting with the society. University students are frequently described as living in the "ivory tower", possessing little knowledge and experience of the social life. If implemented properly, the free entry policy can serve as a way of providing social practice for students and let them get a glimpse of the society.
In conclusion, opening university libraries to the public is a wise choice, on condition that proper measures are taken to reduce the side effects and ensure the policy gets effective implementation.
【答案解析】 材料主要内容是几位人士对大学图书馆是否应向公众开放的看法,按题目要求,首先简要总结双方的观点,接着给出自己的观点并进行论证。文章结构可安排如下:
第一段:概括正反双方的论点,然后简要提出自己的论点:大学图书馆应该向公众开放。
第二段:从最大化利用资源的角度来支持自己的论点。
第三段:结合人们阅读减少的现状来说明开放大学图书馆有利于营造社会文化氛围。
第四段:指出公众进入图书馆能够为“象牙塔”中的学子提供与社会接触的机会。
第五段:重申论点,并说明应该采取适当的措施来减少负面效应和保证政策得到有效的实施。
[参考译文]
关于大学图书馆向公众开放
如今,大学图书馆对公众免费开放已经成为了一种趋势,这引起了人们的热议。一些人认为这是绝好的主意,不仅能使大学的资源得到充分利用,而且可以鼓励更多的人重拾阅读的习惯。另一方面,很多人表达了他们的疑虑,担心这一做法会给管理工作带来困难,也会占用本应优先提供给大学师生的有限资源。在我看来,大学图书馆对公众开放是明智之举。
首先,这一做法最明显的好处就是大学图书馆的资源可以得到最大化的利用。大学的图书馆资源非常丰富。即使大批学生和教师经常光临图书馆,也只有有限的一部分资源能够得到利用,一些冷门的资料大多无人问津。因此,包含各行各业人士的公众群体进入图书馆可以使资源得到充分利用。
其次,这一政策有利于营造社会的文化氛围。阅读在民众生活中所占的位置越来越小已经成为了不争的事实。为公众提供一个更为便利和更低成本的接触丰富智力资源的渠道有利于改善这种状况。
再次,公众进入大学图书馆能够为学生提供一个与社会互动的机会。大学生经常被形容为活在“象牙塔”之中,对社会生活的认识和经验都很少。如果实施恰当的话,免费开放大学图书馆政策可以为学生提供进行社会实践的途径,让他们一睹社会的面貌。
总的来说,向公众开放大学图书馆是明智的选择,前提是采取适当的措施来减少负面效应和保证政策得到有效的实施。