单选题 .  In the past, falling oil prices have given a boost to the world economy, but recent forecasts for global growth have been toned down, even as oil prices sink lower and lower. Does that mean the link between lower oil prices and growth has weakened?
    Some experts say there are still good reasons to believe cheap oil should heat up the world economy. Consumers have more money in their pockets when they're paying less at the pump. They spend that money on other things, which stimulates the economy.
    The biggest gains go to countries that import most of their oil like China, Japan and India. But doesn't the extra money in the pockets of those countries' consumers mean an equal loss in oil-producing countries, cancelling out the gains? Not necessarily, says economic researcher Sara Johnson. "Many oil producers built up huge reserve funds when prices were high, so when prices fall they will draw on their reserves to support government spending and subsidies (补贴) for their consumers."
    But not all oil producers have big reserves. In Venezuela, collapsing oil prices have sent its economy into free-fall.
    Economist Carl Weinberg believes the negative effects of plunging oil prices are overwhelming the positive effects of cheaper oil. The implication is a sharp decline in global trade, which has plunged partly because oil-producing nations can't afford to import as much as they used to.
    Sara Johnson acknowledges that the global economic benefit from a fall in oil prices today is likely lower than it was in the past. One reason is that more countries are big oil producers now, so the nations suffering from the price drop account for a larger share of the global economy.
    Consumers, in the U.S. at least, are acting cautiously with the savings they're getting at the gas pump, as the memory of the recent great recession is still fresh in their mind. And a number of oil-producing countries are trimming their gasoline subsidies and raising taxes, so the net savings for global consumers is not as big as the oil price plunge might suggest.1.  What does the author mainly discuss in the passage? ______
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】 首段,并综合全文。
   本题实际询问文章的主题,是主旨题。第1段指出当前油价下跌,但经济增长却放缓的事实,最后一句为设问,低油价(lower oil prices)和经济增长(growth)的关系是否已变弱。下文内容实际上是从不同的角度(Some experts、两名经济学家Sara Johnson和Carl Weinberg、和消费者)回答该问题,故文章主题应该是围绕低油价对全球经济的影响而展开的,C项“廉价石油对全球经济增长的影响”正确。
   文章只是说油价下跌这个事实,并没分析其原因,故A项“油价暴跌背后的原因”不对。文章也没提到如何促进全球经济增长,B项“刺激全球经济的可行办法”严重便离文章重点。文中只有第2段和最后一段提到油价下跌对消费者的影响,属于文章的细节内容,不是文章的主旨,故D项“油价下跌对消费者消费的影响”不对。
[参考译文] 在过去,石油价格下跌会推动世界经济增长,但现在即使油价越跌越低,最近全球经济增长仍预计会放缓。这是否意味着油价下跌和经济增长之间的关系已经削弱?
   有些专家说,仍有充分的理由相信石油价格低廉会促进世界经济升温。消费者在油泵上花钱少了,他们口袋里的钱就多了。他们就会把这笔钱花在其他方面,从而刺激经济。
   最大的受益者是那些主要依靠石油进口的国家,比如中国、日本和印度。但是,这些国家消费者口袋里由此盈余的钱是否等同于石油生产国的损失,从而抵消了这种获利?经济研究员莎拉·约翰逊表示未必是如此。“许多石油生产国在油价高涨时设立巨额储备基金,因此当价格下跌时,它们将利用储备金支持政府开支和给予本国消费者补贴。”
   但并不是所有的石油生产国都有大量的储备。在委内瑞拉,崩溃的油价使其经济一落千丈。
   经济学家卡尔·温伯格认为,油价暴跌的负面影响压倒了廉价石油的积极影响。这意味着全球贸易总额急剧下降,部分原因是因为石油生产国负担不起以往那么多的进口。
   莎拉·约翰逊承认,现在油价下跌带来的全球经济利益可能比过去少。原因之一是,现在有更多的国家成为了石油生产大国,所
   以遭受价格下跌影响的国家占全球经济的份额更大.、
   消费者正谨慎地花他们从油泵上省下来的钱,至少美国的消费者是这样,因为他们对最近的经济大衰退记忆犹新。一些石油生产国正在削减汽油补贴和提高税收,因此全球消费者的净储蓄增长并不如石油价格暴跌带来的潜在收益。