阅读理解 In this hypercompetitive economy, the old rules for managing just don't cut it. What counts now is innovative thinking—at a time when bosses are being critiqued more than ever before. Ideas matter. These New Thinkers are leading industries in whole new directions. The most famous of these New Thinkers have already created iconic New Economy businesses—eBay and AOL—and now they've begun innovative second acts.
These New Thinkers are part of the first generation raised in an era in which leadership has been taught as an academic discipline. From executive coaches to MBA courses to acres of shelves in libraries, there's nearly as much advice today on how to improve your leadership skills as your sex life. But all this advice raises a question: has the burgeoning be-a-better-boss industry actually produced ... better leaders?
The answer is yes, to a degree. First, the increased attention on bosses' people skills has led to less tolerance(by boards, shareholders and employees)for bad leadership than in the past. Second, managers are proving more able to jump between industries today. Another factor: while in the past aspiring leaders mostly tried to emulate good managers, today there's newfound interest in learning from managerial train wrecks, like Howell Raines at The New York Times. And as power has flowed downward in organizations—driven not just by benevolent bosses, but also by technology like blogs that make organizations more transparent—the pressure on leaders to act appropriately will only grow.
Among younger workers, there's also more recognition that leadership isn't simply a function of job title. When today's young people name the leaders they admire, they list people like Steve Jobs, Oprah Winfrey and the founders of Google—rarely does a Fortune 500 boss show up(and politicians are even rarer). People in their 20s and 30s were raised in a time of wider options. Many realize that today the best way to become a leader isn't to spend 20 years slogging upward at a corporate behemoth—it's to strike out and start your own gig, which you'll lead from day one.
You can make an argument that society's focus on leadership is over-blown: in truth, no matter how ambitious we are, most of us spend more of our lives as followers than leaders. But as business gets more complicated and workdays grow ever longer, bosses will have little choice but to delegate more and micromanage less. In today's world, like it or not, you may be a leader sooner than you expect.
单选题 11.It can be inferred from the first paragraph that act one was______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】属细节题。第一段末句提到新思想家们已经开创了标准的新经济企业(eBay andAOL),现在他们又开始创新的第二步骤了。以此推断C项为正确答案。A项创造性思维是思想家们的总体思想,并非第一步骤。B项原文未提及。第二句虽然指出现在的老板比以前更经常地被人批评了,但这不是第一步,所以排除D项。
单选题 12.The word "burgeoning"(line 4, para. 2)most probably means "______".
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】属语义题。从执行官辅导到MBA课程再到图书馆大量的书架上,几乎到处都可找到很多关于如何提高领导技能的建议。但所有这些建议都提出一个问题:如何当个好领导这一迅速发展的行业真的造就出比以前更好的领导了吗?由此可推出A“兴旺发展的”为正确答案。其他选项均无依据。
单选题 13.Which of the following is not true according to the text?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】属推断题。第三段指出,人们对老板的领导能力越来越重视,董事会、股东和雇员变得比以前更不能容忍领导能力低下的经理了。言外之意就是经理对董事会、股东和雇员更负责了。另外,经理们今天更有能力在不同的企业跳来跳去了(管理不同的企业)。另外,他们学会了从管理失误中汲取教训。综上所述,D为正确答案。
单选题 14.People today are more likely to admire______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】属推断题。根据题干定位到原文第四段第二句:今天的年轻人列举他们仰慕的领军人物时,他们会列出像Steve Jobs和Oprah Winfrey,以及Google的创始人这样的人物,很少列出500强的CEO,至于政治家们就更少了。即使考生不知道Steve Jobs和Oprah Winfrey,也能从founder一词得到提示。所以正确答案为B。
单选题 15.What is implied in the statement "society's focus on leadership is over-blown"?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】属推断题。blown是blow的过去分词,意思是“膨胀的,夸大的”,再根据原文末段首句:你可能争论说,社会对领导能力过于重视了。要注意冒号后解释的内容:事实上,不管我们多么有抱负,我们大多数人大多时候都是跟随者而不是领导者。因此可确定答案为B。其他选项均无根据。