单选题. The predictability of our mortality rates is something that has long puzzled social scientists. After all, there is no natural reason why 2,500 people should accidentally shoot themselves each year or why 7,000 should drown or 55,000 die in their cars. No one establishes a quota for each type of death. It just happens that they follow a consistent pattern year after year. A few years ago a Canadian psychologist named Gerald Wilde became interested in this phenomenon. He noticed that mortality rates for violent and accidental deaths throughout the western world have remained oddly static throughout the whole of the century, despite all the technological advances and increases in safety standards that have happened in that time. Wilde developed an intriguing theory called "risk homeostasis". According to this theory, people instinctively live with a certain level of risk. When something is made safer, people will get around the measure in some way to reassert the original level of danger. If, for instance, they are required to wear seat belts, they will feel safer and thus will drive a little faster and a little more recklessly, thereby statistically canceling out the benefits that the seat belt confers. Other studies have shown that where an intersection is made safer, the accident rate invariably falls there but rises to a compensating level elsewhere along the same stretch of road. It appears, then, that we have an innate need for danger. In all events, it is becoming clearer and clearer to scientists that the factors influencing our lifespan are far more subtle and complex than had been previously thought. It now appears that if you wish to live a long life, it isn't simply a matter of adhering to certain precautions ..., eating the right foods, not smoking, driving with care. You must also have the right attitude. Scientists at the Duke University Medical Center made a 15-year study of 500 persons personalities and found, somewhat to their surprise, that people with a suspicious or mistrustful nature die prematurely far more often than people with a sunny disposition. Looking on the bright side, it seems, can add years to your life span.1. What social scientists have long felt puzzled about? ______
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[参考译文] 长期以来,对死亡率的预测一直困扰着社会科学家。为什么每年有2500人死于意外持枪自杀?为什么有7000人溺水而亡?又为什么有55000人死在自己的汽车里?这些都不能用自然的原因解释。没有人会为每个类型的死亡设立一个限额。它就是那么发生了,遵循一种一成不变的模式,年复一年。 几年前,一位叫杰拉尔德·怀尔德的加拿大心理学家对这一现象产生了兴趣。他注意到尽管科技进步了,安全标准也提高了,但非常奇怪的是整个西方世界的死亡率和意外死亡率在整个世纪中保持恒定。怀尔德提出了一个称为“内部风险平衡”理论。根据这一理论,人类本能地接受一定程度的风险。当确保一件事物安全时,人们会以某种方式重申其原有的危险程度。举例来说,人们系上安全带就会感觉更加安全,因此,驾驶速度会快一些,也更鲁莽一些。这样做就抵消了安全带带来的好处。其他研究表明,十字路口设置得越安全,事故率越低。但是同一路段上其他地方的事故却将这一状态打破。很明显,我们貌似天生需要危险。纵观所有的事件,科学家们愈来愈清楚地认识到影响我们寿命的因素远比之前想到的微妙和复杂。因此,想要长寿,不是简单地遵守预防措施……,而是要正确饮食,不抽烟,谨慎驾驶,还必须持乐观的态度。杜克大学医疗中心的科学家们做了一项长达15年的研究,主要研究500个人的个性。他们惊讶地发现,疑心重和不信任他人的人比乐观豁达的人早死。因此,乐观地生活吧,这样做也许可以使你延年益寿。 细节题。短文开篇就提出长期困扰科学家的问题,根据第一段最后一句It just happens that they follow a consistent pattern year after year. 即死亡率遵循着一种不变的模式。故选项B正确。