Can this be the right time to invest in luxury goods? Miuccia Prada was obviously biting her nails. The granddaughter of the founder of the Italian fashion group has just opened spectacular new stores in quick succession in New York and London. With its magic mirrors, silver displays and computer-controlled changing rooms, Prada"s two-month-old shop in Manhattan cost a staggering $40m, sits just a mile from Ground Zero, and sells practically nothing. The luxury-goods business has been in despair in hasty succession against a background of a weakening global economy, an enduring slump in Japanese spending, and the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Japanese, who used to buy a third of the world"s luxury goods, cut their foreign travel in half after the attacks and tightened their Louis Vuitton purse-strings. At the same time, wealthy Americans stopped flying, which has a dramatic effect on the luxury-goods purveyors of London, Paris and Rome. At home too, Americans"attitudes to luxury changed, at least temporarily. "Conspicuous abstention" replaced greedy consumerism among the fast-growing, younger breed of newly rich. The decline in job security, the lower bonuses in financial services, and the stock market bust that wiped out much of the paper wealth generated in the late 1990s, bred a new frugality. Sales of expensive jewelry, watches and handbags—the products that make the juiciest profits for the big luxury-goods groups—dropped sharply. The impact has been most striking among the handful of large, quoted luxury-goods companies. France"s Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy (LVMH), the industry leader, issued four profits warnings after September 11th and ended up reporting a 20% decline in operating profit for 2001, after having repeatedly promised its investors double-digit growth; and Italy"s Gucci Group, the third largest, announced this week that second-half profits dropped by 33%. Meanwhile, privately held Prada had to postpone its stock market flotation and was forced to sell a recently acquired stake in Fendi, a prestigious Italian bag maker, in order to reduce its debts. Luxury is an unusual business. A luxury brand cannot be extended indefinitely: if it becomes too common, it is devalued, as Pierre Cardin and Ralph Lauren proved by sticking their labels on everything from T-shirts to paint. Equally, a brand name can be undermined if it is not advertised consistently, or if it is displayed and sold poorly. Sagra Maceira de Rosen, a luxury-goods analyst at J.P. Morgan, argues that, "Luxury companies are primarily retailers. In retailing, the most important thing is execution, and execution is all about management. You may have the best designed product, but if you don"t get it into the right kind of shop at the right time, you will fail."
单选题 By "Miuccia Prada was obviously biting her nails"(Paragraph 1), the author means
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"Miuccia Prada was obviously biting her nails"的意思是…"。根据原文第1自然段,其意思是"很明显,Prada正处于困境中"。而选项"Prada由于快速的执行力而臭名昭著","Prada 总是有一种坏习惯"是字面含义,以及"Prada相当忙碌于自己的工作"皆不符合题意。
单选题 What is the attitude of consumers towards luxury goods in the present situation?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"消费者对当前高档消费品的情形的态度是…"。根据文章第2、3自然段的阐述可见,他们的态度是"谨慎的"。而选项"无忧无虑","惊慌失措"以及"迷惑的、混淆的"皆不符合题意。
单选题 It can learned from the text that
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"根据原文我们可以得到…"。综观全文,我们可以得到的结论是本文的主旨,即"业外人士对高档消费有误解"。而选项"过分的广告造成了Prada投资的失败","高档消费品公司应该认真考虑恐怖袭击的影响"以及"执行只不过是企业管理的一个辅助手段"皆不符合题意。
单选题 When mentioning "double-digit growth"(Paragraph 4), the author is talking about
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"当提到double-digit growth时,作者谈论的是…"。根据上下文,作者谈论的是"高档消费品的惊人利润"。而选项"从房地产投资得到的回报","股票市场的盈利带来的回报"以及"新开商店的固定资产"不是本段谈论的观点,皆不符合题意。
单选题 To which of the following is the author likely to agree?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"作者赞同的是…"。综观全文,作者赞同的是"不是每一块云彩都有它的闪光点的",即"不是每个企业都能获得利润的",答案选项表达了此意。而选项"开新的商店是欣欣向荣的","过多的投资带来过多的回报"以及"节俭才是唯一的策略"皆是断章取义,不符合题意。