单选题
Directions:
Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank.

Weak dollar or no, $ 46,000-the price for a single year of undergraduate instruction amid the red brick of Harvard Yard-is{{U}} (1) {{/U}}But nowadays cost is{{U}} (2) {{/U}}barrier to entry at many of America's best universities. Formidable financial-assistance policies have{{U}} (3) {{/U}} fees or slashed them deeply for needy students. And last month Harvard announced a new plan designed to{{U}} (4) {{/U}}the sticker-shock for undergraduates from middle and even upper-income families too.
Since then, other rich American universities have unveiled{{U}} (5) {{/U}}initiatives. Yale, Harvard's bitterest{{U}} (6) {{/U}}, revealed its plans on January 14th. Students whose families make {{U}}(7) {{/U}}than $60,000 a year will pay nothing at all. Families earning up to $ 200,000 a year will have to pay an average of 10% of their incomes. The university will{{U}} (8) {{/U}}its financial- assistance budget by 43%, to over $ 80m.
Harvard will have a similar arrangement for families making up to $180,000. That makes the price of going to Harvard or Yale{{U}} (9) {{/U}}to attending a state-run university for middle-and upper-income students. The universities will also not require any student to take out{{U}} (10) {{/U}}to pay for their{{U}} (11) {{/U}}, a policy introduced by Princeton in 2001 and by the University of Pennsylvania just after Harvard's{{U}} (12) {{/U}}. No applicant who gains admission, officials say, should feel{{U}} (13) {{/U}}to go elsewhere because he or she can't afford the fees.
None of that is quite as altruistic as it sounds. Harvard and Yale are, after all, now likely to lure more students away from previously{{U}} (14) {{/U}}options, particularly state-run universities, {{U}}(15) {{/U}}their already impressive admissions figures and reputations.
The schemes also provide a{{U}} (16) {{/U}}for structuring university fees in which high prices for rich students help offset modest prices for poorer ones and families are less{{U}} (17) {{/U}}on federal grants and government-backed loans.
Less wealthy private colleges whose fees are high will not be able to{{U}} (18) {{/U}}Harvard or Yale easily. But America's state-run universities, which have traditionally kept their fees low and stable, might well try a differentiated{{U}} (19) {{/U}}scheme as they raise cash to compete academically with their private{{U}} (20) {{/U}}. Indeed, the University of California system has already started to implement a sliding-fee scale.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】形容词辨析,首先这里的主干部分是$46,000 is…,price是在破折号内的,因此可以把high排除掉。而再看后文里的奖助学金之类的政策,可以说这笔学费应该是很高的,而非合理的或便宜的,故选择expensive。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】既然前文提到这些学校的学费很贵,那么从逻辑上说进这些学校学费该是一个很大的障碍。而本句有一个转折,说明应当是没有障碍,因此选择no。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】首先本句的结构是一个让步的关系,即需要填人的这个动词的程度应当比or后面的成分更深。那么看or后面的slashed them deeply for needy students,为需要的学生大大降低了学费,那么可以推断出B项和C项不合适。而D项和A项相比,D项是普通意义上的减少,并不会比大大降低有多少程度上的递进,故选择A项。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】A项缓和,B项中止,C项加强,D项减少。结合这个动词的宾语sticker-shock,这是一个美国术语,直译是“标签震惊”,也就是看了标签上的价钱后震惊不已,形容定价太高。那么前述的减免学费政策自然应当是缓和这种震惊。C项在意思上肯定不对,B、D不适用于这种抽象性的对象。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】从后文看,耶鲁等大学也出台了相应的减免学费政策,那么应当是similar;前文并未提及哈佛的具体措施,所以same无从谈起。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】哈佛和耶鲁的关系,相提并论、相互竞争,乃至相互合作都是可以的。那么重点需要理解bitter这个单词的修饰作用,bitter在这里是指显示出嫉妒、怨恨或失望的,因此结合选项,rival最为合适。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】结合文章主题是减免学费的高校财政支持政策,那么能够享受这些政策的应该是低收入家庭,所以是less than…。poorer than后面的所比较对象不符合语法规范,故不选。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】根据后面的by 43%判断,expand和increase比较合适,enhance和elevate都不能在后面加上具体的百分比。而increase后面的宾语更多的是具体的数值,而不是仅仅一个budget,故expand最为合适。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】前文说哈佛也对年收入接近18万美元的家庭有相应的学费减免计划,如此一来,进入哈佛学习的学费将相应降低,那么这和州立大学的学费相比呢?一般来说哈佛等私立大学的学费会比公立大学的学费高,有了这个计划,则相应降低,故应当是comparable,可比较的,比得上的。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】take out是一个固定搭配,意为“获取,办理”。后文的动词为支付,则可以判断出是要通过借款或者打工来支付,take out part-time job不符合搭配,使用take part-time jobs即可。savings或work都不符合题意。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】A项charge一般指收费,B项一般指交通费,C项指付款、报酬,综合全文,都是在说学费,故选出D项。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】本文第一段说“And last month Harvard announced a new plan”,那么可以判断出这里指代前文哈佛的announcement;若选择implementation,由于本处并未提及该公告,故应当有implementation of…之类。policy会造成语义残缺,而adjustment并未在文中提及。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】本句是说任何获得入学许可的同学都不会因为无力负担学费而觉得______该去其他地方。A项有压力的,语义合适;B项羞愧的,这不符合常识,或者说并非常态;C项不安全和D项不高兴在文中都未曾提及。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】本题要抓住后面的particularly state-run universities,前文说到哈佛和耶鲁之类的大学经过学费减免计划之后学费同公立大学差不多,那么这里结合选项,cheaper最为合适,mote reasonable未有提及,public则意思不对,即previously public说明之前是公立,现在是私立了;better也未有提及。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】首先根据句意判断,哈佛耶鲁与公立学校竞争以招来更多的学生,这肯定是有积极意义的,所以像shrink和diminish这样的含有消极意义的词汇不符合题意。同时这个动词的宾语是reputation和figure,expand无法与reputation搭配,故选择C。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】此处的scheme指代前面各大高校的资助政策,后面是说分别收费有助于减少对联邦贷款的依赖,那么结合选项,应当是model最为合适。文中并未提及有关高校学费区分的困难及机会,故A项不选。disposition和location都不符合文意。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】既然对于学生的学费进行了区分收取,那么中低收入家庭所要负担的学费就较之前少一些,故可以不用再大规模地向联邦借贷。“The universities will also not require any student to take out loans to pay for their tuition”从这句话可以推断。故应该是依赖程度更低,故选D。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】A项打败,B项赢得,C项模仿,D项跟随。这里是说学费高昂但是财力并不雄厚的私立学校并不能轻松______哈佛和耶鲁,文中并未提及相互竞争的内容,故A、B项错误。从全文来看应当是说他们也想引入区分收费的政策,所以应当是copy,选项follow,应当为follow one's example方为合适,故选C。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】根据前文copy哈佛或耶鲁的表述,可以推断出他们也是要区分收费,那么便是pricing。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】这里前面是说公立大学,那么与之竞争的对应者应当是私立大学,那么应该是private counterparts,故选择B。