Now that many media chieftains have fallen into disrepute and have left, those who are still in positions feel the need to take the problem seriously. "CEOs were overturned as were some stocks." That is how AOL Time Warner entertainment group Chairman Jeff Bewkes summed it up. The era of the "imperial" (one-man rule) CEO has come to an end, MTV Networks Chairman Tom Freston added. The two executives agreed that the industry"s complex and often ill-fated megs mergers had proven that bigger is not necessarily better, no matter how big the reputations of the personalities behind them. The continuing flameout of media executives who a few years ago were hailed as visionaries was active this month, and the industry"s fears reached into the executive ranks of music, publishing and TV. Technology visionary Steve Case left as chairman of AOL Time Warner, replaced by Chief Executive Richard Parsons. Top executives at Sony Music, MCA Records and Random House were booted. And Walter Isaacson, chairman of CNN Networks, left for a think tank. This shows just how difficult it has become to find the right managers for the terribly altered media. "Many executives got caught up in the late 90"s boom in the media industry and got ahead of themselves in strategic vision for their companies," said Mark May, of US investment firm Kaufman Bros. "It takes more than a couple of years for these companies to be ready for another visionary." The collapse of the dotcom bubble, the ability of music fans to get songs free on the Internet, sagging bottom lines and intense competition among cable TV news networks are some developments that helped trip up media executives recently. But the urge to merge was one of their weakest points. It is not that media companies should avoid all mergers, said Larry Haverty, managing director at State Street Research, a US investment management firm. They need acquisitions for growth. But making them work is a real challenge. They need to choose what pieces fit together and how much they are worth. They need to adjust quickly when technology and consumer habit trends shift. And, more than ever, they must be careful not to promise too much. Sony Corp. of America Chairman Howard Stringer said that an executive today is "the rarest of senior entertainment executives, equally adept at business, management strategy and value creation, as well as a consummate(完美的) and proven developer of content, talent and ideas".
单选题 Both Jeff and Tom agree that
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:推理题。文章第三段提到,Jeff和Toni一致认为公司并非越大越好,这是由巨型公司合并的失败得到证明的。因此,他们的观点是"传媒业对并购应持谨慎态度"。"传媒领袖是有远见且积极的"和"传媒经理人有着很好的声誉和人品"是对二人观点的错误表述;the media industry is too complicated是对原文"the industry"s complex...mergers"的曲解,所以这三项都不正确。
单选题 The word "flameout" (Line 1, Paragraph 4) may probably mean
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:语义题。从构词法角度看,此词为合成词:flame(火焰) +out(熄灭),即"熄火,中断"之意;另外,The continuing flameout指的是上文传媒业高层经理持续不断的离职。因此,resignation"离职,辞职"符合文意。"奢侈,浪费","提升,促进","合并"都与文章意思不符。
单选题 What caused the decline of media?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:细节题。文章第六段指出很多经理人都沉浸在90年代末传媒业的繁荣时期,因而给公司定制了超前的目标,这些公司恐怕还得过几年才能用到那样的战略目标。因此,"公司的战略超前"符合文意。"没有有远见的经理人"过于绝对,中got caught"被捉"是对原文中"got caught up in the boom"的曲解,"很多明智的经理人已离开了传媒业"是该行业衰落引起的后果,而非原因,所以这三项都不正确。
单选题 The biggest problem media executives are facing nowadays is
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:细节题。文章第七段指出了高层管理者陷入困境的原因:网络经济泡沫的破裂、歌迷可从网上下载歌曲、有线电视的竞争以及强烈的合并欲望;而这些原因中最薄弱的环节是"并购的欲望",所以答案选项正确。
单选题 According to the text, a good media CEO needs the following capabilities EXCEPT
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:细节题。文章第八段和第九段对如何当好传媒业高层管理者进行了论述,其中涉及到在商业方面很擅长、在开发才能和思想方面很专业以及有能力去管理和创造,即题目中的其他三个备选项。文章第八段结尾处指出要根据趋势变化做出调整,所以"在趋势变化之前进行调整"是不正确的。