单选题 The simple act of surrendering a telephone number to a store clerk may not seem harmful—so much so that many consumers do it with no questions asked. Yet that one action can set in motion a cascade of silent events, as that data point is acquired, analyzed, categorized, stored and sold over and over again. Future attacks on your privacy may come from anywhere, from anyone with money to purchase that phone number you surrendered. If you doubt the multiplier effect, consider your E-mail inbox. If it's loaded with spam, it's undoubtedly because at some point in time you unknowingly surrendered your E-mail to the wrong Web site.
Do you think your telephone number or address is handled differently? A cottage industry of small companies with names you've probably never heard of—like Acxiom or Merlin—buy and sell your personal information the way other commodities like corn or cattle futures are bartered. You may think your cell phone is unlisted, but if you've ever ordered a pizza, it might not be. Merlin is one of many commercial data brokers that advertises sale of unlisted phone numbers compiled from various sources— including pizza delivery companies. These unintended, unpredictable consequences that flow from simple actions make privacy issues difficult to grasp, and grapple with.
In a larger sense, privacy also is often cast as a tale of "Big Brother" —the government is watching you or a big corporation is watching you. But privacy issues don't necessarily involve large faceless institutions: A spouse takes a casual glance at her husband's Blackberry, a co-worker looks at E-mail over your shoulder or a friend glances at a cell phone text message from the next seat on the bus. While very little of this is news to anyone—people are now well aware there are video cameras and Internet cookies everywhere—there is abundant evidence that people live their lives ignorant of the monitoring, assuming a mythical level of privacy, people write E-mails and type instant messages they never expect anyone to see. Just ask Mark Foley or even Bill Gates, whose E-mails were a cornerstone of the Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft.
And polls and studies have repeatedly shown that Americans are indifferent to privacy concerns. The general defense for such indifference is summed up a single phrase: "I have nothing to hide." If you have nothing to hide, why shouldn't the government be able to peek at your phone records, your wife see your E-mails or a company send you junk mails? It's a powerful argument, one that privacy advocates spend considerable time discussing and strategizing over.
It is hard to deny, however, that people behave differently when they're being watched. And it is also impossible to deny that Americans are now being watched more than at any time in history.

单选题 In the first paragraph, the telephone number is cited to show ______.
A. many customers didn't keep their privacy confidential
B. it is harmful to give a store clerk a telephone number
C. careless disposal of personal information can be harmful
D. customers should inquire its use when giving telephone numbers to others
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点] 细节题
[解析] 首段第1句提到泄露电话号码是有害的,第2~3句指出这一行为可能带来的麻烦,故选C。A、B本身正确但只停留在例子本身,并没有指明举例要表明的问题。D在文中没有提及。
单选题 What do companies like Acxiom and Merlin do?
A. Compile telephone directories for businessmen.
B. Collect and sell personal information to make a profit.
C. Trade commodities like corn on the market.
D. Crack down crimes like stealing private information.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 细节推断题
[解析] 根据Acxiom和Merlin定位到第2段第2句。该句第2个破折号说明了这两家公司的性质,指出它们买卖个人信息就像在市场买卖玉米和牛期货证券一样,故选B。文中提到Merlin公司出售那些未登记过的电话号码,这些号码汇编来源多样,A只是利用原文个别单词设置的干扰项;文中只是说这些公司买卖个人信息的方式就像在市场买卖玉米一样,故C错;D“破解窃取个人信息的犯罪行为”在文中没有提及。
单选题 From Paragraph 3, we learn that ______.
A. cases of privacy intrusion happen only in large institutions
B. people are quite aware of how their privacy is intruded
C. it is not privacy intrusion when a wife glances at her husband's cell phone
D. Bill Gates' E-mail messages were cited as evidence against him
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[考点] 细节题
[解析] 由第3段第2句可知A错误;由该段倒数2、3句可知人们对隐私受侵犯并没有很强的意识,故B也错。But一句指出隐私问题并不一定只涉及大机构,冒号后所列举的例子即是对此观点的支持,可见C的说法也是不正确的。末句指出司法部控告微软公司就是利用比尔·盖茨的邮件为证据,故D正确。
单选题 It can be inferred from the fourth paragraph that the author thinks ______.
A. Americans are actually concerned about privacy issues
B. Americans are indifferent to privacy concerns
C. Americans are very frank about privacy concerns
D. Americans are puzzled about privacy concerns
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[考点] 推理判断题
[解析] 第4段第1句指出调查和研究证明美国人对隐私问题漠不关心,但根据后文连续几个假设问句可以推断出美国人实际上很关注他们的隐私问题,故C错误;B只是一种表面现象;文中没有提及他们对隐私的关注是否“迷惑”,D也不对。
单选题 Which of the following is the author's viewpoint?
A. Never give your private information to anyone.
B. People should pay more attention to their privacy issues.
C. Do not surrender your E-mail to any website.
D. It does no good saying "I have nothing to hide".
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 推理判断题
[解析] 文章首段就提到了隐私无意间的泄漏可能会带来的麻烦,接下来几段分别从个人信息被滥用、隐私问题无处不在、美国人对隐私的态度等方面说明,在当今时代,由于通信技术的发展,对于个人隐私的保护问题越来越复杂,因此人们对隐私问题应给予更多的重视,故选B。A、C说法太过绝对;D项也不能概述作者的观点。