单选题
Earlier this year, 13-year-old Shannon Sullivan was socializing in the same way as dozens of her classmates. She maintained a personalized page on a website that contained her photograph and details about what makes her unique. But then her mother found out. And now her site and those of her friends—once lovingly adorned with everything from sound bites to video clips—are fast disappearing at the insistence of their safety-minded parents. " They're not aware how easily something predatory can happen over the Internet, " says Shannon's mother, Margaret, " Maybe when they're older, in college or something, but it's just not safe before that. " Internet stalkers have killed at least four minors in the past three years, and law enforcement authorities count about 5,000 reports of attempted sexual predation over the Internet in the past year, according to Parry Arab, executive director of an Internet safety organization. Given such statistics, parents need to get over the feeling that they're invading their children's privacy by reading their blogs, Ms. Aftab says. She believes that parents must bring their judgment to bear on the content of what's posted. Others fear, however, that certain precautions could amount to swatting a fly with a sledgehammer, and could take a hefty toll on family life. The likelihood of tragedy is far greater whenever a child rides in a car or goes swimming than when he or she posts his or her name, photograph, and other personal information on the Internet, says Laurence Steinberg, an expert in adolescent psychology at Temple University. " The downside of prohibiting it is worse than the downside of allowing it, " he says. " A good parent-child relationship is based on trust. I think people do get especially worked up for some reason over the Internet. But snooping on what your child does on the Internet, to me in some ways, is no different from reading your child's diary. " Though the value of pursuing a reasonable level of safety goes undisputed in this discussion, adults differ on the value of increasing a child's freedom and privacy over time, especially in cyberspace. Aftab supports adolescent privacy with pen-and-paper diaries, for instance, because the content there is " between the child and the page, " whereas website content is " for the whole world to see. " Posting private Web content before age 16 only invites trouble, she says, yet many teens do it in a highly public bid for " attention, recognition, and affection. " Still, Steinberg says, while parents need to monitor Web usage by teens, they also should accept that they won't always know everything about a child's life, especially as children become older teens. " There are going to be lots of things that I don't know about in my child's life, and that's OK, " Steinberg says. " It's part of the development process. /
单选题
In the opening paragraph, the example of Shannon reflects______.
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题。本题问香农母亲的看法。由关键词“Shannon's mother”可定位到第二段。她说道“Maybe when they're older, in college or something, but it's just not safe before that”,这里是口语,“when”前面省略了“it's safe”。也就是说,等孩子们上了大学,上网就比较安全了,但孩子现在还小,所以上网是危险的,故B项正确。第二段提到,“They're not aware how easily something predatory can happen over the Internet”,意思是孩子们不知道网上容易发生危险的事情,不是说他们不知道如何利用互联网,故排除A。从第二段香农母亲的话中可知,文中讨论的是年龄的对比,而不是大学校园与互联网的对比,由此排除C。文中说年龄大一点上网会更安全,而不是更容易,故排除D。
单选题
Which of the following proverb has a similar meaning with " swatting a fly with sledgehammer " ?
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】[解析] 词汇题。swatting a fly with sledgehammer的字面意思是“用大锤拍蚊子”,显然是用来比喻小题大做。而C项的字面意思是“将小土丘(鼹鼠丘)当作大山”,比喻义也是小题大做,故本题选C。A项的字面意思是“将肩膀靠在车轮上帮助推车”,引申为“鼎力相助”,与文意不符,排除。B项意为“谨慎防灾”,D项意为“千里之堤,溃于蚁穴”。文中是指不要小题大做,而这两项强调的是对小问题也要谨慎防范,故均排除。
单选题
Blogs differ from diaries mostly by their______.
单选题
What are the attitudes of Aftab and Steinberg towards parents' precautions
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】[解析] 态度题。解答此题要定位原文中两人所表达的观点。第三段最后一句提到“she believes that parents must bring their judgment to bear on the content of what's posted”,这里的she就是指阿夫塔卜,bear on意为“施加压力”。由此可以看出阿夫塔卜认为家长应该采取预防措施。第四段第三句出现斯坦伯格的直接引语“The downside of prohibiting it is worse than the downside of allowing it …”,由此可以看出,斯坦伯格认为家长不该禁止孩子开博客。综上所述,A项“前者肯定而后者否定”正确。其他三项均不正确。