单选题 Recently I stood in front of my class, observing an all-too-familiar scene. Most of my students were secretly—or so they thought—looking at their smart phones under their desks.
As I called their attention, students" heads slowly lifted, their eyes reluctantly glancing forward. I then cheerfully explained that their next project would practice a skill they all desperately needed: holding a conversation. Several students looked confused. Others moved uneasily in their seats, waiting for me to stop watching the class so they could return to their phones.
Even with plenty of practice, most kids were unable to converse effectively. They looked down at their hands. Some even reached for their phone—the last thing they should be doing.
As I watched my class struggle, I came to realize that conversational competence might be the single-most overlooked skill we fail to teach students. Kids spend hours each day engaging with ideas and one another through screens--but rarely do they have an opportunity to truly practice their interpersonal communication skills. Admittedly, teenage awkwardness and nerves play a role in difficult conversations. But students, reliance on screens for communication is affecting their engagement in real-time talk.
It might sound like a funny question, but we need to ask ourselves: Is there any 21st century skill more important than being able to hold a confident, coherent (连贯的) conversation? When students apply for colleges and jobs, they won"t conduct interviews through their smart phones. When they negotiate pay raises and discuss projects with employers, they should demonstrate a thoughtful presence and the ability to think on their feet.
But in our rush to meet 21st—century demands,we aren’t asking students to think and communicate in real time. Online discussion boards and Twitter are useful tools for exchanging ideas. But they often encourage a "read, reflect, forget about it" response that doesn"t truly engage students in extended critical thinking or conversation.
As Sherry Turkle writes, "We are tempted to think that our little "sips" of online connection add up to a big gulp (大口) of real conversation. But they don"t."
单选题 How did the students react when the author announced the next project?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 推理题。由next project可定位到第二段,答案在“Several students looked confused. Others moved uneasily in their seats, waiting for me to stop watching the class so they could return to their phones.”里:几个学生有点疑惑,其他的则在座位上不自在地挪动,等着老师眼光离开他们,他们好接着看手机。由此推理可知,学生对next project没有兴趣。
单选题 How did the conversation project go?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题。从第三段中“most kids were unable to converse effectively”可知,很多孩子都不能有效交谈。由此可知,本题答案为C(远远不能令人满意)。
单选题 What does the author try to emphasize in Paragraph 5?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 主旨题。第五段的主旨就是该段首句的问题:在21世纪,还有什么能力比能进行一个自信、连贯的对话更重要?紧随其后作者强调交谈能力在申请大学和工作、加薪谈判等实际工作中的重要性。因此本题的答案为A。
单选题 Sherry Turkle would agree that online connection ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 推理题。通过Sherry Turlde回到原文定位到最后一段,她说:“我们往往认为网上浅尝辄止的联系就同等于真实对话中的深入沟通,实则不然。”由此可以推理得知,她认为线上交流不可能代替真实的对话。故本题正确答案为D。
单选题 What is the tone of the author in this passage?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 态度题。从全文来看,作者对学生缺乏沟通交流技巧的现状表示极为担忧。objective“客观的”,concerned“担心的”,indifferent“冷淡的”,relieved“放松的”,只能选择concerned。