The NHS (National Health Service) has approved the creation of chains of hospitals for the first time in its history in a bid to tackle its deep financial problems and to allow more patients to be cared for by leading doctors in their fields. It will see highly respected institutions, such as Moorfields eye hospital in London and Manchester's Christie cancer centre, providing specialist services to patients potentially many miles away in another part of England. But the move has prompted fears that it will lead to the running down, and even closure, of small local hospitals which are highly valued by patients as a result of mergers and takeovers. Simon Stevens, the chief executive of NHS England, will announce the dramatic step in a speech to the CBI on Friday in which he will hail it as part of the "radical reform" the health service must undergo if it is to remain viable. He has pledged to transform the way the NHS in England works by 2020 so it can withstand the huge pressures caused by the growing and ageing population, growth in the number of people with long-term conditions such as diabetes and dementia, and tight budgets expected for years to come. The decision to permit hospitals to band together into chains, which are common in many other countries, overturns 67 years of NHS history. Ed Smith, the chair of NHS financial regulator Monitor, said the era of standalone hospitals such as the foundation trust hospitals introduced by the last Labour government, was dead. Smith said: "These were right at the time, but the economic and clinical circumstances facing the NHS are now different, and our response needs to evolve." While hospitals would still retain their separate identities for the time being, NHS sources admitted it could lead to big or high-performing hospitals taking over smaller district general hospitals, many of which are increasingly in the red and struggling to provide high-class care, especially with a growing shortage of many types of health professionals. Dr. Gives Peedell, an oncologist who co-chairs the National Health Action party, said: "The history of mergers in the NHS, and in the wider world of industry, is by no means one of predictable success. The danger would be that smaller trusts are gobbled up by larger ones in the name of efficiency, leaving services much less accessible for local people. And the evidence from America shows that chains end up squeezing out competition and care is compromised in the quest to maximize profit."
单选题 Why has the NHS approved of the creation of chains of hospitals?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:定位到第一段第一句:The NHS has approved the creation of chains of hospitals for the first time in its history in a bid tackle its deep financial problems and to allow more patients to be cared for by leading doctors in their fields.“英国国家医疗服务系统首次批准设立连锁医院,以解决其严重的金融问题,并让更多患者受到各领域一流医生的照料。”问因果找因果,C项选项就是第二个原因啊!只是在替换的时候我用到了下一句中的词汇来替换:leading doctors in their fields=respected institutions。就好像我们遇到过的the supreme court=the Justices,它们是一个道理。A项选项:大家注意原文中说的是its,也就是NHS面对经济问题,而不是hospitals“医院”面对经济问题(facing主动表被动),这是典型的偷换啊!(这个选项给我们的提示就是一定要关注指代!)B项选项说改善连锁医院的医疗设备就更不对了,题干问的是为什么同意设立连锁医院;这根本就是不知所云,这是出题人瞎编的一个答案。D项选项说提供专业的服务给更多的医院来帮助病人。这也不是题干的原因啊!
单选题 What is the public's concern about this dramatic step in the radical reform?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:在题干中我设置了一个定位障碍,也就是我故意把你们的目光引到了第二段第二句中的dramatic和radical reform。但是第二句中的the dramatic step就是指第一句中的the move.所以答案就来自于第一句:concern=fears; the running down, and even closure,of small local hospitals=The disappearance of some highly treasured small-sized medical institutions。所以选A项哦!其他选项都是我根据其他句子胡编乱造的。
单选题 What can we infer from the third paragraph?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:第三段最后一句就是答案来源句:economic factor and medical environment=economic and clinical circumstances。feasible意为“可行的"。最后一句就是在告诉我们:现在做出的回应是由这些因素和环境决定的。再次提醒:段落推理题答案来自首末句、观点句和转折处的可能性是最大的。因此答案选A项。B项选项中are no longer supported by the government for political reasons“出于政治原因而不被政府支持”在文中没有依据;C项中used to的意思就是“过去这样,现在不这样”,所以和原文第一句是矛盾的,原文中很明确地说到了“现在在其他国家也是很常见的”;D项选项是我拼凑出来的一个选项。
单选题 Which of the following is true according to the fourth paragraph?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:这个题目的答案来自第四段第一句:hospitals would still retain their separate identities for the time being,其中features就是identities。其他的三个选项都是我拼凑的。不过说实话,这样出题很爽,就在于能耗费学生在考场上的时间,你需要一个选项一个选项地切分,然后和原文进行对照;在定位的时候,同学们可以利用顺序原则。最后提醒大家注意一个短语:in the red“入不敷出"。
单选题 What does Dr. Peedell think about the chain hospitals?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:根据题干定位到最后一段。首先这段话不难理解,这个医生是不看好这种合并的。D项选项来自第一句后半句:The history of mergers in the NHS,and in the wider world of industry, is by no means one of predictable success.这句话中有一个重要的短语:by no means“绝不”,等于not。所以by no means one of predictable success=uncertain。而且其他三个选项都在说这次合并好,所以三正一负,答案常选负啊。C项选项中哪怕有may也不对啊!毕竟这段话都是在说合并医院不好。优先选D项啊!