Harvard thrilled middle-class parents last week by capping its tuition for families with incomes of up to $180,000 at 10 percent of their earnings. The move sparked hopes of a donation race that could ease the soaring costs of college. Earlier this month, Duke joined a group of schools including Harvard, Princeton, and Stanford that promise free rides to low-income students. But many point out that these gestures will affect only a few hundred lucky students. The outlays are so comparatively small that they are unlikely to divert pressure for reforms in the ways colleges spend their money—especially the estimated $380 billion of endowment funds stored in tax-free accounts. "It"s an important gesture," College Parents of America President James Boyle says of Harvard But colleges should do more now with the money they"ve socked away for a rainy day, he says The numbers are smaller, but the story is similar at other colleges. The average endowment has been reaping 10 percent a year on investments since 2004. But colleges spent an average of just 4.6 percent of their endowments last year while raising tuition faster than the rate of inflation. That troubles folks like Sen. Chuck Grassley, who"s pushing Congress to require wealthy colleges to spend at least 5 percent of their endowments every year. "Tax-exempt organizations are supposed to provide public benefit in exchange for their special status," he said. "Helping the next generation afford college is a public benefit. " Many college officials, of course, are battling such rule changes. While Harvard, Yale, and Princeton all have more than $1 million worth of endowment per student, half of all colleges have no more than $2,000 per student saved up. Even high-earning schools say they already are spending as much as they should. Chris Bittman, chief investment officer of the University of Colorado Foundation, racked up almost 23 percent in returns last fiscal year, bringing the school"s endowment to nearly $800 million. He supports the school"s policy of spending 4.5 percent. Recent big profits can"t last forever, he says. Instead, endowments should plan on earning the long-term average of 10 percent. Still, pressure appears to be forcing some changes. In June, Stanford announced it would increase its endowment spending to 5.5 percent, or $160 million a year. If every school followed suit, that would free up about $4 billion a year (or $200 per student) to increase aid or keep tuition prices down. Or as Richard Vedder, an Ohio University economist, says, "a small step for mankind."
单选题 According to the first two paragraphs, the "free rides" to famous schools will probably
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题。答案在第一、二段。第二段最后一句讲到大学应该用存下来的钱做更多的事,这与D项内容相符。A项中的a good many students与文中的only a few hundred不符;B项中的promote the reform与文中的unlikely to divert pressure for reforms不符;C项内容在文中并未提及。
单选题 Sen. Chuck Grassley suggests that the schools should
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:推理判断题。根据Sen.Chuck Grassley定位到第三段。他说:“免税组织既然拥有特殊的地位,就应该提供公共福利作为交换”,C项与此相符。A项所说“提高捐赠基金”与文章不符;B、D两项文中均未提及。
单选题 According to Paragraph 4, Chris Bittman believes that
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题,考查例证细节。根据Chris Bittman定位到第四段。根据Bittman的说法“近期的高收益不可能永远持续”,再根据endowment should plan on earning…这些字眼可知,他认为支出的比率是依赖于捐赠基金的投资收益情况,可知C项符合题意。A项谈论捐赠基金的投资问题,与本文主题无关;而B项是James Boyle而非Chris Bittman的观点;D文中并未提及。
单选题 The phrase "a small step for mankind" (Last line, Paragraph 5) shows that the increased endowment spending will
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:引用推断题。根据题干定位到最后一段。文中提到如果每个学校都效仿的话,将每年腾出约40亿美元。而根据前文第三段提到的学校作为免税单位对社会公共福利的责任,可得出B项为正确答案。A项与文章主旨相反;C项文中并未提及;D项中的free education属过度推断,片面理解。
单选题 What can we infer from the text?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题,考查是非细节。根据全文理解,可得知一些著名大学虽然收人丰厚,但在学生身上的花费却在不断减少,据此可得出答案为A项。B项中的even disl~ibution错误;C项说大学生将免除学费,这在文中并未提及;D项与文章主旨相反。