单选题
Jonathan Swift made a famous Modest Proposal in 1729
that the babies of the Irish poor should be eaten to prevent them growing up to
a poverty-stricken life of crime. It was, of course, ironic. But nearly 300
years later I would like to make a modest proposal about babies that is almost
as astonishing, yet not at all ironic. I've come reluctantly to think, that
perhaps some babies, in the public interest and to prevent them growing up to a
life of violence, should be forcibly taken from their mothers and
adopted. Freedom and compassion are two of the things I believe
in most passionately and this proposal is entirely at odds with both, or so it
seems. The image of little children being wrenched from the arms of their deeply
upset mothers is one of the worst one can imagine. However, the parents of some
of the criminally violent young people of today are not worthy of the name of
mother or father. Some of those babies, given the extreme disadvantages of their
upbringing, will grow up to torment, hurt and kill. All too
often when a shocking murder is reported, it emerges that the killers had a
background designed to produce such semi-psychotic violence. We could demand to
know where the criminal justice system was in all this or why there are not
police on the streets. But we don't often demand an explanation from the
parents. Children from orderly homes do not tend to go about the streets looking
for a fight. It is the children of the useless-there is no better word for it,
I'm sorry to say-who go so tragically wrong. I am not talking
about parents or children who suffer from mental illness; they can't be held
responsible. I'm talking about parents who are pretty much in their fight minds,
when not high on drink and drugs, and who choose to neglect their children, and
who, neglecting or abusing those they have already, go on to have more. I mean
never-married parents, with no standards, who have a string of partners coming
and going, who have babies by different lovers, who are careless if those
itinerants (partners) abuse their own children, who are running welfare scams or
living by crime. What hope is there for their children? Now
there's a challenge to politicians: stop talking about the cycle of deprivation
and break it by taking away the babies and giving them to loving adoptive
parents. A modest proposal, and a difficult one, but the only realistic
one.
单选题
The author believes his proposal is
A. modest but critical.
B. shocking but practical.
C. modest and forceful.
D. practical and ironical.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】观点态度题。通常在首、尾段能找到作者表达的观点,从首段原文almost as astonishing和末段的the onlyrealistic one确定B项“使人震惊但也很实际的”与之相符。A项“谦虚但批判的”、C项“谦虚但有力的”中的modest和文中的modest“小小的”不是同一个意思;D项的ironical与文章中“我这里是一点也没有讽刺的意思”相悖。
单选题
The babies of unworthy parents will
A. not deserve to be a mother or father.
B. probably grow to be criminals.
C. have all the disadvantages in their lives.
D. hurt and kill themselves later.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】事实细节题。根据unworthy parents定位在第二段,其中讲到有些婴儿长大后便会去折磨、伤害甚至杀害他人,故B项正确。A项not deserve to be a mother or father“不配当母亲或父亲”是对原文not worthy ofthe name of mother or father的曲解,原文是指这些孩子的父母不配当父母,而不是这些孩子本身不配当父母:C项all the disadvantages过于绝对化;D项与原文不符,原文只提到他们会折磨、伤害甚至杀害他人。
单选题
According to the author, the reason for some shocking murders may often
be
A. the imperfect criminal justice system.
B. the inefficiency of policemen.
C. the psychological problems of criminals.
D. the irresponsible family education.
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】事实细节题。考查因果细节,根据a shocking murder定位到第三段,本段提出家庭环境,尤其是父母对孩子的成长至关重要,最后一句指出犯下错误的正是那些不负责任的家庭的孩子,故D项正确。A项“不完善的犯罪司法体系”、B项“警察执法不力”均是作者提出的对比原因,目的是引出被忽视的原因,即家庭教育:C项“罪犯的心理问题”是对原文produce such semi-psychotic violence“产生半精神病似的暴力行为”的曲解。
单选题
The last sentence in Paragraph 4 implies that
A. the careless parents neglect the future of their children.
B. the parents of right minds give no hope to help their children.
C. the children of never-married parents have nothing to hope.
D. the children of never-married parents are hopeless criminals.