单选题 For more than thirty years after astronauts first set foot on the Moon, scientists have been unable to unravel the mystery of where the Earth's only satellite came from. But now there is direct evidence that the Moon was born after a giant collision between the young Earth and another planet.
Previous studies of rocks from the Earth and the Moon have been unable to distinguish between the two, suggesting that they formed from the same material. But this still left room for a number of theories explaining how—for example, that the Moon and Earth formed from the same material at the same time. It was even suggested that the early Earth spun so fast it formed a bulge that eventually broke off to form the Moon.
Franck Poitrasson, and his colleagues at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology have compared Moon rocks with rocks from Earth and discovered a surprising difference. They analysed the weight of the elements present in the rock using a highly accurate form of mass spectroscopy(光谱研究) that involves vaporising a sample by passing it through an argon (氩) flame. Although they appeared very similar in most respects, the Moon rocks had a higher ratio of iron-57 to iron-54 isotopes(同位素)than the Earth rocks. "The only way we could explain this difference is that the Moon and the Earth were partly vaporised during their formation," says Poitrasson.
Only the popular "giant planetary impact" theory could generate the temperatures of more than 1700℃ needed to vaporise iron. In this scenario, a Mars-sized planet known as Theia crashed into Earth 50 million years after the birth of the Solar System. This catastrophic collision would have released 100 million times more energy than the impact believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs—enough to melt and vaporise a large portion of the Earth and completely destroy Theia. The debris from the collision would have been thrown into orbit around the Earth and eventually coalesced to form the Moon.
When iron is vaporised, the lighter isotopes burn off first. And since the ejected debris that became the Moon would have been more thoroughly vaporised, it would have lost a greater proportion of its lighter iron isotopes than Earth did. This would explain the different ratios that Poitrasson has found.

单选题 The main theme of the passage is ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】本题是主旨大意题。综合本文各段的主题句即可知本文主要是在阐述月球的起源。
单选题 Previous studies could not distinguish between ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】本题是具体细节题。解题的关键是要理解第2段第1句中unable to distinguish between the two这部分the two指的是什么,分析句子结构可以看出the two指的是该句前半部分提到的rocks from the Earth and (rocks from) the Moon.
单选题 Franck Poitrasson and his colleagues analyzed the weight of the elements present in the rock in order to ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】本题是推断引申题。从本文的大意可以看出弗兰克·波特拉森和他的同事们分析岩石成分重量的主要目的是为了了解月球的起源。
单选题 The passage tells us that the Theia crashed into the Earth ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】见第4段第1句话中的could generate the temperature of more than 1700℃ needed to vaporize iron(能够产生使铁熔化所需要的1700℃以上的高温)与选项C相符合。
单选题 Which of the following statement is NOT TRUE according to the passage?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】在第一段末尾提到“there is direct evidence that the Moon was born after a giant collision between the young Earth and another planet”所以A正确。在第四段中提到,“the Moon rocks had a higher ratio of iron 57 to iron 54 isotopes than the Earth rocks”所以B也正确。在第五段中也提到,“This catastrophic collision would have released 100 million times more energy than the impact believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs”所以D正确,故选C。
单选题 What can we infer from the passage?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】推断引申题。解题的提示出现在文章的最后一段:would have lost a greater proportion of its lighter iron isotopes than Earth did.