单选题 Faced with rising costs, decreased funding and laws in many states designed to keep public universities from raising tuition, many state school systems are making up for budget inadequacy by adding fees for everything from "technology" to "energy". Meanwhile, the average cost to attend a public school increased 47% between 2000 and 2007 (adjusted for inflation) according to the College Board, a non-profit that studies education costs and owns the SAT. State politicians are so eager to advocate low-cost higher education that "tuition" has become a dirty word. The F-word, on the other hand fees—has become a go-to charge for public universities strapped for cash.
The 2006—2007 school year marked the first time fee increases outpaced tuition hikes, according to the College Board. Fees were up 8% and tuition 6% in 2007—2008 compared to the previous year. Why the fee frenzy? State legislatures across the country have instituted strict limits on tuition increases and require arduous bureaucratic and political procedures to change them. With financing for public universities on the decline since the 1980s, "everybody got very interested in what they could do to affect revenues, and fees Undoubtedly turned out to be one of the measures they could control," says David Brenaman, an economics professor at the University of Virginia who studies college financing.
In Oregon, so many extras had been tacked on over the years that in 2007, fees added as much as 40% to the cost of tuition. When campuses saw their energy bills go up, students were charged a fee. When classrooms had to be wired for new technologies, students were charged a fee. "There were some that were one-time things that ended up staying a little bit longer," concedes Diane Saunders, director of communications for the Oregon University System. These covert tuition hikes did not go unnoticed. The Oregon Student Association, which represents pupils at the state"s seven public colleges, protested the enormous fees, arguing that they decreased transparency in the system and penalized students whose financial aid packages only covered tuition. In June, the system announced that mandatory fees would be rolled into tuition. "So families know what they"re facing up front and so students know what they"re facing up front," says Saunders, who credits the students for being "co-advocates" with the Oregon University System that is constantly lobbying the state legislature for more funding.
With no state politician likely to campaign on a platform of dramatically increasing school tuitions, fees will continue to fill in the gaps. And as high oil prices continue to drive up the cost of energy and transportation—to name just two expensive items in any university budget—students are advised to read their bills carefully. And don"t forget to factor in the F-word.
单选题 Why do universities choose to increase fees rather than tuition?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 第一、二、四段都提到了法律对提高学费有多么严格的规定,政治家如何把阻止学费上升作为自己的政治主张。
单选题 From the last sentence of the first paragraph we learn that ______
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 在本句中,the F-word指fee(本文中指学费以外的其他杂费),go-to charge指“可以借助的收费方式”,strapped for cash喻指缺钱花。实际上,这句话是对第一段内容的一个小结。
单选题 Which of the following is not mentioned as a cause for the fee frenzy?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 第二段提到官僚程序和政治程序时,并不是说要改变它们,而是说要改变法律规定(本句中的them指strict limits on tuition increases)需要艰难的官僚和政治程序。
单选题 The students at Oregon complain about the ______
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 俄勒冈学生联合会对沉重的杂费负担提出了抗议,认为这样做缺乏透明度(transparency),伤害了靠资助的学费上学的那些学生的利益。在对此作出回应时,俄勒冈大学承认这样做缺乏透明度,因此将来要把某些必收的项目并入学费,以便家长和学生在选择学校时就能比较清楚地知道学校的收费标准。这里之所以提到透明度问题,是因为有些fee是上学以后才收取的,学生入学前并不知道要收这类费用。
单选题 In response to the students" complaint, the authority promises ______
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 参阅上一小题题解。