填空题 {{B}}Section B{{/B}}
{{B}}Passage One{{/B}}
If you're like most people, you're way too smart for advertising. You skip right past newspaper ads, never click on ads online and leave the room during TV commercials.
That, at least, is what we tell ourselves. But what we tell ourselves is wrong. Advertising works, which is why, even in hard economic times, Madison Avenue is a 34 billion-a-year business. And if Martin Lindstrom--author of the best seller Buyology and a marketing consultant for Fortune 500 companies, including PepsiCo and Disney--is correct, trying to tune this stuff out is about to get a whole lot harder.
Lindstrom is a practitioner of neuromarketing (神经营销学) research, in which consumers are exposed to ads while hooked up to machines that monitor brain activity, sweat responses and movements in face muscles, all of which are markers of emotion. According to his studies, 83% of all forms of advertising principally engage only one of our senses: sight. Hearing, however, can be just as powerful, though advertisers have taken only limited advantage of it. Historically, ads have relied on slogans to catch our ear, largely ignoring everyday sounds--a baby laughing and other noises our bodies can't help paying attention to. Weave this stuff into an ad campaign, and we may be powerless to resist it.
To figure out what most appeals to our ear, Lindstrom wired up his volunteers, then played them recordings of dozens of familiar sounds, from McDonald's wide-spread "I'm Lovin' It" slogan to cigarettes being lit. The sound that blew the doors off all the rest--both in terms of interest and positive feelings--was a baby giggling. The other high-ranking sounds were less original but still powerful. The sound of a vibrating cell phone was Lindstrom's second-place finisher. Others that followed were an ATM distributing cash and a soda being burst open and poured.
In all of these eases, it didn't take an advertiser to invent the sounds, combine them with meaning and then play them over and over until the subjects being part of them. Rather, the sounds already had meaning and thus fueled a series of reactions: hunger, thirst, happy expectation.
单选题 As is mentioned in the first paragraph, most people believe that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 要理解第1段的内容,就要结合第2段开头3句。在第2段中,第3句开头的Advertising works是承接第2句“我们告诉自己的是错误的”而说的,表明第2段第2句中“我们告诉自己的”是“我们认为广告不会对自己产生作用”,如此,才能和Advertising works在意思上对立,形成对错关系,而由That知这就是第1段的主要内容。因此,本题应选D。 [点睛] 第2句是在描绘人们如何忽略广告,之所以这样,是由于人们自以为广告不会对他们产生什么影响,这样,在逻辑上才能与第2段衔接。干扰项A、B貌合神离,是为误导那些不结合原文、单凭生活经验想当然地答题的考生。
单选题 What do we know about Madison Avenue in hard economic times?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 原文该句中的定语从句which is why和even...等表明因为有了advertising,麦迪逊大道在经济困难 [点睛] A“更繁荣”说法没有原文支持;本题稍具干扰性的是B,B中的turns to也可表明advertising和麦迪逊大道业务繁荣的因果关系,但该选项中的so as to survive不正确,因为原文并没有表示麦迪逊大道要挣扎求存;C中表示的advertising和麦迪逊大道的逻辑关系没有原文依据。
单选题 What do we learn about PepsiCo and Disney from the passage?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 原文该句两个破折号之间的including表明PepsiCo and Disney和其他某些《财富》500强公司一样, [点睛] 根据a marketing consultant for...Disney只可知Lindstrom向PepsiCo and Disney提供营销建议,但Lindstrom的建议对这两家公司的影响有多大不得而知,因此,C和D对Lindstrom所起作用的说法均缺乏原文依据。
单选题 It is pointed out by Lindstrom that advertisers should _______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 根据第3段倒数第2句中的largely ignoring everyday sounds表明Lindstrom认为everyday sounds, [点睛] Lindstrom虽然是研究“神经营销学”的,但他并没有讨论人们对”神经营销学“的关注程度,因此B无从说起;Lindstrom强调了everyday sounds在广告中的重要性,但文中并没有提到他建议广告商减少对slogans和sight这两种方式的依赖性,因此,C和D均不正确。
单选题 It is found by Lindstrom that a baby giggling is ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 从第4段第1句的most appeals和第3句的other high-ranking sounds were less...等可以推断a baby giggling是最能吸引人注意的声音,即“让人印象最深刻的”,因此,本题应选C。 [点睛] 原文第4段的第1句表明在该段Lindstrom要讨论的是“最能吸引人的”声音,其他选项都与这个主题相去甚远。