Asia"s real boat-rocker is a growing China, not Japan, a senior American economist observed. There is so much noise surrounding and emanating from the world"s miracle economy that it is becoming cacophonous. In Washington, D.C., the latest idea is that China is becoming too successful, perhaps even dangerously so: while Capitol Hill resounds with complaints of trade surpluses and currency manipulation, the Pentagon and sundry think-tanks echo to a new drumbeat of analysts worrying about China"s 12.6% annual rise in military spending and about whether it might soon have the ability to take preemptive military action to force Taiwan to rejoin it. So it may be no coincidence that for three consecutive weekends the streets of big Chinese cities have been filled with the sounds of demonstrators marching and rocks being thrown, all seeking to send a different message: that Japan is the problem in Asia, not China, because of its wanton failure to face up to its history; and that by cosying up to Japan in security matters, America is allying with Asia"s pariah. Deafness is not the only risk from all this noise. The pressure towards protectionism in Washington is strong, and could put in further danger not only trade with China but also the wider climate for trade liberalisation in the Doha round of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). So far words have been the main weapons used between China and Japan, but there is a chance that nationalism in either or both countries could lead the governments to strike confrontational poses over their territorial disputes in the seas that divide them, even involving their navies. And the more that nationalist positions become entrenched in both countries but especially China, the more that street protests could become stirred up, perhaps towards more violence. All these issues are complex ones and, as is often the case in trade and in historical disputes, finding solutions is likely to be far from simple. A revaluation of the yuan, as demanded in Congress, would not rebalance trade between America and China, though it might help a little, in due course. A "sincere" apology by Japan for its wartime atrocities might also help a little, but it would not suddenly turn Asia"s natural great-power rivals into bosom buddies. For behind all the noise lies one big fact: that it is the rise of China, not the status or conduct of Japan, that poses Asia"s thorniest questions.
单选题 The "the world"s miracle economy" in the beginning of the second paragraph refers to
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:推理题。文章一开始就谈到,亚洲真正掌舵的是中国,而不是日本;第二段第二句也提到"…中国正变得太成功",由此可推知第二段开头的"世界的奇迹经济"指的就是中国的经济成功,所以答案选项正确。"亚洲真正的掌舵者","日本的经济成功"和"中国和日本的经济成功"都不是文章所要表达的内容。
单选题 What does the word "think-tanks" (Paragraph 2) mean?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:语义题。根据文中的the Pentagon and sundry think-tanks可知think-tanks与the Pentagon"五角大楼,美国国防部"为并列关系,是某类组织机构,由此可推知"为一些问题提供解决办法的机构或组织(即智囊团)"符合文意。"能够象人一样思考的坦克","一群权威人士"和"学者和专业人士"都不符合文章的意思。
单选题 What is the reason for the demonstrations in the streets of big Chinese cities?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:细节题。文章第二段最后一句中提到"…日本是亚洲的问题,而不是中国,因为其不道德而无法面对其历史;通过在安全事务上同日本表示友善,美国与亚洲的贱民结盟",由此可知中国大城市中的游行原因是"日本不愿正视其历史"。"中国采取军事行动强迫台湾重新加入其中","日本是亚洲的问题,而不是中国"和"美国与亚洲的贱民结盟"都不是文中提及的原因。
单选题 How will the territorial disputes between China and Japan be settled according to the author?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:细节题。文章第三段第三句提到"迄今为止,言语是中日之间使用的最主要的武器,但是两国之一或两国的民族主义可能有机会引导政府打击其面临的对将其分割开来的海洋领土争端所作的姿态,甚至动用其海军",但是就中日将怎样解决其领土争端,作者并没有给出一个明确的说明,所以"不明确"符合文意。"通过言语和谈判","通过其海军"和"严通过更多的武力"都不是作者提及的内容。
单选题 What is the main cause of the issues in Asia according to the author?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:推理题。文章最后一句提到"因为在所有这些嘈杂之后存在着一个巨大的事实:是中国的崛起而不是日本的地位和行为造成了亚洲棘手的问题",由此可推知作者认为"中国的崛起"是亚洲问题的主要原因。"贸易和历史争端","人民币的升值"和"日本拒绝为其战时暴行道歉"都不是文中提及的主要原因。