单选题 {{B}}第三篇{{/B}}
Archaeology has long been an accepted tool for studying prehistoric cultures. Relatively recently the same techniques have been systematically applied to studies of the more immediate past. This has been called "historical archaeology", a term that is used in the United States to refer to any archaeological investigation into North American sites that postdate the arrival of Europeans.
Back in the 1930's and 1940's, when building restoration was popular, historical archaeology was primarily a tool of architectural reconstruction. The role of archaeologists was to find the foundations of historic buildings and then take a back seat to architects.
The mania for reconstruction had largely subsided by the 1950's and 1960's. Most people entering historical archaeology during this period came out of university anthropology departments where they had studied prehistoric cultures. They were, by training, social scientists, not historians, and their work tended to reflect this bias. The questions they framed and the techniques they used were designed to help them understand, as scientists, how people behaved. But because they were treading(踩,踏) on historical ground for which there was often extensive written documentation and because their own knowledge of these periods was usually limited, their contributions to American history remained circumscribed. Their reports, highly technical and sometimes poorly written, went unread.
More recently, professional archaeologists have taken over. These researchers have sought to demonstrate that their work can be a valuable tool not only of science but also of history, providing fresh insights into the daily lives of ordinary people whose existences might nt otherwise be so well documented. This newer emphasis on archaeology as social history has shown great promise, and indeed work done in this area has led to a reinterpretation of the United States' past.
In Kingston, New York, for example, evidence has been uncovered that indicates that English goods were being smuggled into that city at a time when the Dutch supposedly controlled trading in the area. And in Sacramento an excavation at the site of a fashionable nineteenth-century hotel revealed that garbage had been stashed(存放) in the building' s basement despite sanitation laws to the contrary.
单选题 What is the main topic of the passage?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】通读全文,可以发现文章是围绕着历史考古学这一领域的研究方法和目标的变化展开的。
单选题 According to the passage, what is a relatively new focus in archaeology?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】根据文中第一段所述,最近,考古学作为工具已经被系统地应用到更近期的历史的研究中去下。这个研究领域被称为“历史考古学”。可见,最近的研究热点是更近期的历史。
单选题 According to the passage, when had historical archaeologists been trained as anthropologists?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】根据文章第三段可知,对复原古建筑的狂热,到20世纪五、六十年代时已经消退大半,这时,进入历史考古学领域的大多数人都来自大学的人类学系,他们在那儿学习史前文化。由此可见,在20世纪五、六十年代,具有人类学背景的人作了历史考古学者。
单选题 In the third paragraph, the author implies that the questions and techniques of history and those of social science are ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】根据文章第三段所述,20世纪五、六十年代的历史考古学家是具有人类学素养的社会科学家,而非历史学家,他们的工作反映了这种学术的偏见。他们设定的问题,使用的技术方法是为了帮助社会学家们,也就是他们自己理解人们的行为。由此可见,作者认为社会科学与历史学所运用的技术和设立的问题有很大差异。
单选题 The equivalent of the word "supposedly" in the last paragraph is ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】“seemingly”:表面上,看起来;“rigidly”:严格地;“ruthlessly”:无情地,毫无怜悯之心地;“barely”无乎不。可知C项与题意最接近。