阅读理解

We’re in the middle of an epic battle for power in cyberspace. On one side are the traditional, organized, institutional powers such as governments and large multinational corporations. On the other are the distributed: grassroots movements, dissident groups, hackers, and criminals. Initially, the Internet empowered the latter. It gave them a place to coordinate and communicate efficiently, and made them seem invincible. But now, the more traditional institutional powers are winning, and winning big. How these two sides fare in the long term, and the fate of the rest of us who don’t fall into either group, is an open question — and one vitally important to the future of the Internet.   In the Internet’s early days, there was a lot of talk about its “natural laws” — how it would transform traditional power blocks, empower the masses, and spread freedom throughout the world. The international nature of the Internet circumvented national laws. Anonymity was easy. Censorship was impossible. Police were clueless about cybercrime. And bigger changes seemed inevitable. Digital cash would undermine national sovereignty. Citizen journalism would topple traditional media, corporate PR, and political parties. The ease of digital copying would destroy the traditional movie and music industries. Web marketing would allow even the smallest companies to compete against corporate giants. It really would be a new world order.   This was a Utopian vision, but some of it did come to pass. Internet marketing has transformed commerce. The entertainment industries have been transformed by things like MySpace and YouTube, and are now more open to outsiders. Mass media has changed dramatically, and some of the most influential people in the media have come from the blogging world. There are new ways to organize politically and run elections. Facebook and Twitter really did help disrupt governments.   But that is just one side of the Internet’s disruptive character. The Internet has emboldened traditional power as well.   On the corporate side, power is being consolidated, a result of two current trends in computing. First, the rise of cloud computing means that we no longer have control of our data. And second, we are increasingly accessing our data using devices that we have much less control over; iPhones, iPads, Android phones, Kindles, ChromeBooks. Unlike traditional operating systems, these devices are controlled much more tightly by the vendors, who limit what software can be run, what they can do, how they’re updated.

单选题 In the Internet battle, the grassroots movement______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】本题是推理题,要求考生理解草根运动从前在互联网之战击败过政府组织机构,尤其要理解起初互联网给予过草根力量。关键点:the Internet empowered the latter。  
单选题 According to the author, in the future a key Internet issue will be______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】本题是细节题,要求考生理解作者认为未来关于因特网的力量双方,关键取决于那些中立的人。关键点在第一段的最后一句。  
单选题 “Natural laws” refers to
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】本题是推理题,要求考生理解“自然法则”的意思。破折号后对自然法则有所解释,接下来的几句都是对于这种状态的例证:匿名很容易,监控不可能,警察对网络犯罪一筹莫展,这些都是反面例证。关键点:The international nature of the Internet circumvented national laws。本题也可以用排除法来分析四个选项。  
单选题 Lack of surveillance over the Internet would likely______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】本题是细节题,要求考生理解对互联网缺乏监管对于各行业的影响,要看懂第二段的后半部分。关键点:...would destroy the traditional movie and music industries。  
单选题 Online media has______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】本题是细节题,要求考生理解互联网市场对商业模式以及对于大众媒体的改变。关键点:…some of the most influential people in the media have come from the blogging world。  
单选题 We now have less control over the data we use because______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】本题是细节题,要求考生理解我们对于自己的个人信息和资料没有掌控权的原因是因为大机构通过云计算和各种应用掌握了我们的数据。关键点:...these devices are controlled much more tightly…。