单选题 In November 1965, New York was blacked out by an electricity failure. The authorities promised that it would not happen again. Pessimists were certain that it would occur again within five years at the latest. In July 1997,there was a repeat performance which produced varying degrees of chaos throughout the city of eight million people. In 1965,the failure occurred in the cool autumn and at a time of comparative prosperity. In 1997,tha disaster was much more serious because it came when unemployment was high and the city was suffering from one of its worst heat waves.
In 1965, there was little crime or looting during the darkness, and fewer than a hundred people were arrested. In 1997, hundreds of stores were broken into and looted. Looters smashed shop windows and helped themselves to jewelry, clothes or television sets. Nearly 4 000 people were arrested but far more disappeared into the darkness of the night. The number of policemen available was quite inadequate and they wisely refrained from using their guns against mobs which far outnumbered them and included armed men.
Hospitals had to treat hundreds of people cut by glass from shop windows. Banks and most businesses remained closed the next day. The blackout started at 9:30 p.m., when lightning hit and knocked out vital cables. Many stores were thus caught by surprise.
The vast majority of New Yorkers, however, were not involved in looting. They helped strangers, distributed candles and batteries, and tried to survive in a nightmare world without traffic lights, refrigerators, elevators, water and electrical power. For twenty-four hours, New York realized how helpless it was without electricity.
单选题 From the first paragraph, we know that ______ were right.
  • A. the authorities
  • B. the pessimists
  • C. both the authorities and the pessimists
  • D. neither the authorities nor the pessimists
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】分析推理题。文章第一段第二、三句分别指出了有关当局和悲观主义者在1965年纽约停电事故后的预期:当局承诺不会再发生这样的事情,悲观者则认为最晚5年内纽约就会再发生停电事故。而事实是1997年又发生了,说明当局的承诺没有做到:而1997年与1965年之间超过了5年,因此悲观者的预期也不对。因此本题选[D] 。
单选题 In what way was the blackout of 1997 not really a repeat performance?
  • A. There was much more disorder.
  • B. This time the electricity supply failed.
  • C. It was quite unexpected.
  • D. It did not occur within five years of 1965.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】分析推理题。在第一段第四句指出1997年的停电事故后,文章其他部分都是在对比两次停电事故的异同。由该段最后一句中的much more serious及后面三段引用的数字可以看出1997年的停电事故引发了更多的动荡,因此选[A] 。其余三项都是事实,但都不是两次事故的差异所在。
单选题 As far as maintaining the peace was concerned, conditions in 1997 were comparatively ______.
  • A. more favourable
  • B. less favourable
  • C. unchanged
  • D. improved
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】分析推理题。由第二段对两次停电事故中罪案的数量,形势进行的对比可以推知1997年这次停电事故处理起来要比1965年那时困难得多,故选[B] 。
单选题 What caused the blackout in July 1007?
  • A. Excessive heat probably made people switch on too many electrical appliances.
  • B. Because of unemployment, some machines were not in proper working order.
  • C. During a storm, lightning damaged supply cables.
  • D. The passage does not mention the cause.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。答案信息对应于第三段倒数第二句:The blackout started at 9:30 p.m.,when lightning hit and knocked out vital cables,即是闪电击中关键线路引发了停电,答案是[C] 。
单选题 Why did many looters manage to escape?
  • A. The police could not see them in the dark.
  • B. Many of the looters were armed with guns.
  • C. There were not enough policemen to catch them all.
  • D. They were hidden inside big buildings.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。答案信息对应于第二段最后一句;The number of policemen available was quite inadequate,这一句即是对前面一句说许多抢劫者逃走了的原因进行说明,与[C] 一致。