Stratford-on-Avon, as we all know, has only one industry—William Shakespeare—but there are two distinctly separate and increasingly hostile branches. There is the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC), which presents superb productions of the plays at the Shakespeare Memorial Theatre on the Avon. And there are the townsfolk who largely live off the tourists who come, not to see the plays, but to look at Anne Hathaway’s Cottage, Shakespeare’s birthplace and the other sights.
The worthy residents of Stratford doubt that the theatre adds a penny to their revenue. They frankly dislike the RSC’s actors, them with their long hair and beards and sandals and noisiness. It’s all deliciously ironic when you consider that Shakespeare, who earns their living, was himself an actor (with a beard) and did his share of noisemaking.
The tourist streams are not entirely separate. The sightseers who come by bus—and often take in Warwick Castle and Blenheim Palace on the side—don’t usually see the plays, and some of them are even surprised to find a theatre in Stratford. However, the playgoers do manage a little sight-seeing along with their play going. It is the playgoers, the RSC contends, who bring in much of the town’s revenue because they spend the night (some of them four or five nights) pouring cash into the hotels and restaurants. The sightseers can take in everything and get out of town by nightfall.
The townsfolk don’t see it this way and local council does not contribute directly to the subsidy of the Royal Shakespeare Company. Stratford cries poor traditionally. Nevertheless every hotel in town seems to be adding a new wing or cocktail lounge. Hilton is building its own hotel there, which you may be sure will be decorated with Hamlet Hamburger Bars, the Lear Lounge, the Banquo Banqueting Room, and so forth, and will be very expensive.
Anyway, the townsfolk can’t understand why the Royal Shakespeare Company needs a subsidy. (The theatre has broken attendance records for three years in a row. Last year its 1,431 seats were 94 per cent occupied all year long and this year they’ll do better.) The reason, of course, is that costs have rocketed and ticket prices have stayed low.
It would be a shame to raise prices too much because it would drive away the young people who are Stratford’s most attractive clientele. They come entirely for the plays, not the sights. They all seem to look alike (though they come from all over)—lean, pointed, dedicated faces, wearing jeans and sandals, eating their buns and bedding down for the night on the flagstones outside the theatre to buy the 20 seats and 80 standing-room tickets held for the sleepers and sold to them when the box office opens at 10:30 a.m.
From the first two paragraphs, we learn that ________.
第一段引出本文的主题,莎士比亚的故乡斯特拉特福镇主要发展旅游业,而这一个产业中却有两个日 渐敌对的分支,一个是由RSC公司运营的莎剧表演,另一个是参观莎士比亚故居的观光游览,而后者是镇 上居民获得收入的主要来源。第二段第一句“镇上的居民非常怀疑剧院里的莎剧表演到底有没有为他们创 收。”后面接着说镇上居民不喜欢莎剧演员们。因此可以推测,小镇居民并不认为莎剧表演创造了收入。C 选项,两者确实日渐敌对,但是不是RSC的两个分支。
It can be inferred from Para. 3 that ________.
第三段后半部分,RSC公司指出,莎剧演员实际上为镇上的酒店和餐馆带来了很多收入,因为演员们 会在镇上过夜,而游客们通常一天的时间就游览完毕,不会留宿。因此两者相比,演员们的花销比观光客 们更多。
By saying “Stratford cries poor traditionally” (Para. 4), the author implies that ________.
第四段承接第三段,“镇上的居民并没有意识到演员们为小镇创收的事实,而且镇政府也没有给RSC公 司补贴,镇上的传统就是哭穷。”但下文鲜明的对比是“城镇上每一家旅馆似乎都在增加新的客房和酒 吧。”由此可以得出,小镇并不缺钱,只是在哭穷。
According to the townsfolk, the RSC deserves no subsidy because ________.
倒数第二段“镇上的居民认为RSC公司不需要补贴,因为剧院的上座率越来越高,连续三年打破纪 录。”居民觉得剧院盈利丰厚,不需要补贴。
From the text we can conclude that the author ________.
作者的态度是同情RSC这一方的。文章主要描述了镇上居民的一些误解,澄清了RSC确实给镇上创收 的事实,也说明了RSC也是需要补贴的,因为票价一直维持低价,而成本却在上涨等,总得来说是为RSC 澄清事实,表达同情。