单选题 Whether mobile phones can cause cancer remains an open question. But they are also accused by some of causing pain. A growing number of people around the world claim to be "electrosensitive", in other words physically responsive to the electromagnetic fields that surround phones and the other electronic devices that clutter the modern world. Indeed, at least one country, Sweden, has recognized such sensitivity as a disability, and will pay for the dwellings of sufferers to be screened from the world"s electronic smog.
The problem is that, time and again, studies of those claiming to be electrosensitive show their ability to determine whether they are being exposed to a real electric field or a sham one is no better than chance. So, unless they are lying about their symptoms, the cause of those symptoms needs to be sought elsewhere.
Michael Landgrebe and Ulrich Frick, of the University of Regensburg, in Germany, think that the "elsewhere" in question is in the brain and, in a paper presented recently to the Royal Society in London, they describe an experiment which, they think, proves their point.
Dr. Landgrebe and Dr. Frick used a body scanner called a functional magnetic-resonance imager to see how people"s brains react to two different kinds of stimulus. Thirty participants, half of whom described themselves as electrosensitive, were put in the imager and told that they would undergo a series of trials in which they would be exposed either to an active mobile phone or to a heating device called a thermode, whose temperature would be varied between the trials. The thermode was real. The mobile phone, however, was a dummy.
The type of stimulus, be it the authentic heat source or the sham electromagnetic radiation, was announced before each exposure and the volunteers were asked to rate its unpleasantness on a five-point scale. In the case of heat, the two groups" descriptions of their experiences were comparable. So, too, was their brain activity. However, when it came to the sham-phone exposure, only the electrosensitive described any sensations—which ranged from prickling to pain. Moreover, they showed neural activity to match.
This suggests that electrosensitivity, rather than being a response to electromagnetic stimulus, is similar to well-known psychosomatic disorders such as some sorts of tinnitus and chronic pain. A psychosomatic disorder is one in which the symptoms are real, but are induced by cognitive functions such as attitudes, beliefs and expectations rather than by direct external stimuli.
The paradoxical point of Dr. Landgrebe"s and Dr. Frick"s experiment is that mobile phones do indeed inflict real suffering on some unfortunate individuals. It is just that the electromagnetic radiation they emit has nothing whatsoever to do with it.
单选题 According to the first paragraph, Sweden ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 事实细节题。根据题干提示定位到第一段。第一段主要说明现在有越来越多的人认为自己受到了电磁场的干扰并引发了不适,并以瑞典为例说明这个问题已经引起了重视。瑞典,已经把电敏感看作残障的一种并由国家提供了一定的保护政策。因此判断A正确。
单选题 The phrase "no better than chance" (Para. 2) most probably means ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 语义理解题。根据原文意思,那些声称电敏感的人在研究实验中往往连真正的电磁场和虚构的电磁场都无法确定,他们的判断和碰运气差不多,因此文章后面才说到电敏感需要从其他地方寻求原因。故答案为C。
单选题 In the experiment of Dr. Landgrebe and Dr. Frick, ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 事实细节题。题目问的是有关兰德格里伯博士和弗里克博士的实验细节,定位到第四段。A“30名实验参与者都声称自己是电敏感的”,而文中第四段提到30名参与者中有一半声称自己电敏感,故排除;B“在测试期间,温度维持不变”,文中明确说明温度是变化的,也排除;第四段最后两句提到热电极是真实的,而移动电话是虚构的,由此排除C;由此可知正确答案为D。
单选题 According to Dr. Landgrebe and Dr. Frick. electrosensitive ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。在倒数第二段中,兰德格里伯博士和弗里克博士得出了实验结论,即电敏感更类似于众所周知的身心机能紊乱,而不是对电磁刺激的反应,由此排除A;文中还提到身心疾病是存在真实症状的,其起因在于态度、信仰和期望等认知功能,而不是直接的外部刺激,由于前面已经提出电敏感更类似于身心机能紊乱,因此排除B和D;由此可知正确答案为C。
单选题 According to this passage, the experiment of Dr. Landgrebe and Dr. Frick ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。本题可以采用排除法。文章没有涉及和体现“科学价值”的问题,排除A;B既不是该实验的目的,也不是该实验的结论,选项内容与文中的实验无关;D并非该实验的结论,那些实验的参与者并没有就其症状说谎,因为那些症状是真实存在的。可知C正确,他们的实验存在自相矛盾的地方,并未成功证明他们的观点。