复合题

For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, using science for the construction of what we call modern civilization. Every dispensable item of contemporary technology, from canal locks to dial telephones to penicillin, was pieced together from the analysis of data provided by one or another series of scientific experiments. Three hundred years seems a long time for testing a new approach to human inter-living, long enough to settle back for critical appraisal of the scientific method, maybe even long enough to vote on whether to go on with it or not. There is an argument.

Voices have been raised in protest since the beginning, rising in pitch and violence in the nineteenth century during the early stages of the industrial revolution, summoning urgent crowds into the streets any day these days on the issue of nuclear energy. Give it back, say some of the voices, it doesn’t really work, we’ve tried it and it doesn’t work, go back three hundred years and start again on something else less chancy for the race of man.

The principle discoveries in this century, taking all in all, are the glimpses of the depth of our ignorance about nature. Things that used to seem clear and rational, matters of absolute certainty— Newtonian mechanics, for example—have slipped through our fingers, and we are left with a new set of gigantic puzzles, cosmic uncertainties, ambiguities; some of the laws of physics are amended every few years, some are canceled outright, and some undergo revised versions of legislative intent as if they were acts of Congress.

Just thirty years ago we call it a biological revolution when the fantastic geometry of the DNA molecule was exposed to public view and the linear language of genetics was decoded. For a while, things seemed simple and clear, the cell was a neat little machine, a mechanical device ready for taking to pieces and reassembling, like a tiny watch. But just in the last few years it has become almost unbelievably complex, filled with strange parts whose functions are beyond today’s imagining.

It is not just that there is more to do, there is everything to do. What lies ahead, or what can lie ahead if the efforts in basic research are continued, is much more than the conquest of human disease or the improvement of agricultural technology or the cultivation of nutrients in the sea. As we learn more about fundamental processes of living things in general we will learn more about ourselves.

单选题 What can’t be inferred from the 1st paragraph?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】由文章第一段最后一句“There is an argument”可知, 人们对科学的看法是有争议的, 故选项C“现代文明有赖于科学, 所以人类一致支持科学进步”是不符合文章大意的。 故答案选C。
单选题 The principle discovery in this century shows _____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】文章第三段最后一句提到“…some of the laws of physics are amended every few years, some are canceled outright, some undergo revised versions of legislative intent…”, 由此可知, 人类对已有理论所采取的做法是修正或摈弃。 故D选项符合文章大意。
单选题 Now scientists have found in the past few years _____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】由文章第四段可知, 30年前人们将DNA的发现称为生物革命, 刚开始时, 人们认为DNA细胞很简单, 但随着时间的推移, 人们发现它其实极为复杂, 由此推断, 人们还需要对其进行进一步研究。 故选项D正确。
单选题 The writer’s main purpose in writing the passage is to say that _____.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】文章最后一段第一句提到“It is not just that there is more to do, but that there is everything to do.”, 这不仅仅是有更多的事情要做而是每一件都需要去做, 由此可知作者认为关于科学还有很多方面有待于进一步研究、 探索, 即科学仍处于起步阶段, 前面的路还很长。 故答案选A。
单选题 长。 故答案选A。The writer’s attitude towards science is _____.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】通读全文可知, 作者以客观的态度说明了科学的发展状况, 并介绍了对待科学的不同观点, 由此可知作者对科学的态度应该是中立的。 答案选C。