阅读理解 In recent decades the so-called Southeast Asian "tigers" have rivaled the western "lions" for stock cliches that make economic headlines. The myth of American economic hegemony over Asia in the imposing and patriarchal figure of Uncle Sam has provided frequent political grist for Southeast Asian political leaders, particularly Malaysia''s Prime Minister Mahathir. He has attempted to forge an international reputation as a snarling tiger, but lately sounds more like a barnyard dog whining at shadows. Without demeaning in any way the remarkable achievements of the newly developing economies of Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia, these nations at times appear to be their own worst enemies. This is often exemplified by Dr. Mahathir, who rails at Western bogey whenever an international or domestic crisis provides an opportunity. To be more specific, the recent devaluation of the Philippine and Thai currencies, and the subsequent pressure on the Malaysian currency has inspired Dr. Mahathir to launch an all-out attack on the West as the source of the problem. He even alleges that the United States has deliberately destabilized Southeast Asian economies in revenge for these nations, pandering to the military rule in Myanmar, an action which the United States seems to want censored rather than rewarded. But by resorting to such scapegoat, instead of accepting even a bit responsibility, the Prime Minister may undermine the future success of the region and Malaysia in particular. Upon further questioning, Dr. Mahathir narrowed his attack to one wealthy individual, the well-known philanthropist, Mr. George Soros, whose opposition to Myanmar''s admission to ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Mahathir found particularly galling. The logical fallacies that underlie such conspiracy theories do not help Malaysia address the serious issues of economic overheating that experts have been warning about for all these difficult periods, ''which'' include large deficits and low savings to debt ratios. In fact, the recent dramatic drop in Malaysia''s stock market and currency has led Dr. Mahathir to reverse his initial approach to the crisis. He even announces measures that at least imply he is quite aware of excesses in his own administration''s spending policies that have contributed to this crisis of confidence. In the end, this kind of reaction undermines the esteem that Dr. Mahathir''s enlightened leadership has justly earned.
单选题 It is implied in the first paragraph that Dr. Mahathir________.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】第一段的第二句话中指出,美国在亚洲的经济霸权主义神话恰好让东南亚各国政治领导人,尤其是马来西亚总理马哈蒂尔借机进行抨击,从而赢得政治利益。由此可见,选项B“试图利用反对西方的行为为自己赢得政治利益”符合题意;选项A在第一段中未提及;第一段并未指出美国控制了东南亚的经济,选项C混淆了经济霸权主义的含义;选项D认为“西方国家对东南亚各国有潜在的影响”,与文中的经济霸权主义含义不同。
单选题 The author of this essay seems to suggest that________.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】文章的第二段和最后一段都可看出作者对马哈蒂尔的观点持异议,故选项A错误;选项B在文中未提及;整篇文章都在攻击马哈蒂尔的观点,并未否认东南亚存在经济问题,故选项C错误;最后一段第二句话中指出,马哈蒂尔关于美国阴谋的谬论难以帮他解决经济过热的问题,可见作者暗示前文中提到的马哈蒂尔面临的经济问题部分是由于经济过热引起的,因此选D。
单选题 The author suggests Dr. Mahathir''s comments on the currency problems________.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】作者指出在面临货币贬值的压力时,马哈蒂尔对美国的指责其实是寻找替罪羊,会破坏未来的发展,可见作者和马哈蒂尔意见相左,故选项C错误;文章未对马哈蒂尔本人做全面评价,故选项A错误;选项D“揭示了马哈蒂尔看待复杂问题的敏锐目光”与作者在第二段中对马哈蒂尔所持的否定态度相反,故错误。文章最后一段最后指出,马哈蒂尔的行为会破坏他已赢得的尊重,因此选B。
单选题 Which of the following is the tone of this essay?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】文章通篇充满讽刺意味,故选项A“讽刺的,怀有偏见的”正确。选项B“客观超然的态度”,选项C“漠不关心的态度”均与原文意思不符;选项D部分正确。因为作者的确对马哈蒂尔hostile,但是并非impassive(无动于衷)。
单选题 The relative pronoun "which" in the last paragraph refers to________.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】从最后一段的第二句话来看,which所引导的定语从句与之前that引导的定语从句一样,都是修饰前面的名词短语the serious issues of economic overheating。该短语的主干是issues,of引导的介词短语作issues的定语,故which指的应该是先行词issues。