单选题 It is often claimed that nuclear energy is something we cannot do without. We live in a consumer society where there is an enormous demand for commercial products of all kinds. Moreover, an increase in industrial production is considered to be one solution to the problem of mass unemployment. Such an increase presumes an abundant and cheap energy supply. Many people believe that nuclear energy provides an inexhaustible and economical source of power and that it is therefore essential for an industrially developing society. There are a number of other advantages in the use of nuclear energy. Firstly, nuclear power, except for accidents, is clean. A further advantage is that a nuclear power station can be run and maintained by relatively few technical and administrative staff. The nuclear reactor represents an enormous step in our scientific evolution and, whatever the antinuclear group says, it is wrong to expect a return to more primitive sources of fuel. However, opponents of nuclear energy point out that nuclear power stations bring a direct threat not only to the environment but also to civil liberties.
Furthermore, it is questionable whether ultimately nuclear power is a cheap source of energy. There have, for example, been very costly accidents in America, in Britain and, of course, in Russia. The possibility of increases in the cost of uranium (铀) in addition to the cost of greater safety provisions could price nuclear power out of the market. In the long run, environmentalists argue nuclear energy wastes valuable resources and disturbs the ecology to an extent which could bring about the destruction of the human race. Thus, if we wish to survive, we cannot afford nuclear energy. In spite of the case against unclear energy outlined above, nuclear energy programmes are expanding. Such an expansion assumes a continual growth in industrial production and consumer demands. However, it is doubtful whether this growth will or can continue. Having weighed up the arguments on both sides, it seems there are good economic and ecological reasons for sources of energy other than nuclear power.
单选题 The writer"s attitude toward nuclear energy is ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】本题问作者对核能源的态度是什么。根据文章最后一句,经过权衡双方的观点,从经济和生态的角度看,似乎我们很有理由不用核能源而用其他的能源。由此我们知道作者在比较了双方的意见之后,认为应该否定核能源。因此,本题的正确答案应是D。
单选题 According to the opponents of nuclear energy, which of the following is true of nuclear energy?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】本题是一道判断是非题。问按照反核能源的人们的观点,下面哪个关于核能源的说法是正确的。根据文章第十句,然而,反对核能源的人们指出核电站会直接带来危害。由此我们可以推断出本题的正确答案应是选择项D“不安全”。
单选题 Some people claim that nuclear energy is essential because ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】本题问有些人声称核能源是必不可少的,原因是什么。利用查阅式阅读法,我们可以在文章第五句中找到相关内容。这句话指出,许多人认为核能源是一种不会枯竭的而又经济实惠的能源,因此是工业不断发展的社会必不可少的。由此我们可以推知,本题的正确答案应是选择项C“它可以满足工业不断发展的社会日益增长的需求”。
单选题 Which of the following statements does the writer support?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】本题是一道判断作者观点类问题。通读全文,根据文章倒数第二句和第三句的内容,这种扩展是以工业生产和消费者需求持续增长为前提的。但是,这种增长将否或能够持续还未确定。由此,我们可以推断出本题的正确答案应是选择项A“消费品的需求不一定会持续增长”。
单选题 The function of the last sentence is to ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】本题是一道具体细节题。问文章中最后一句话的作用是什么。文章最后一句话指出,经过权衡双方的观点,从经济和生态的角度看,似乎我们很有理由不用核能源而用其他的能源。由此我们可以推断出本题的正确答案应是B“表达了作者的态度”。