单选题 Higher demand from developing countries and oil producers is offsetting the lower demand of wealthy countries. Consumption in these countries will rise 3 percent in 2008, or 1.2 million barrels a day, projects the International Energy Agency. Many of these countries subsidize fuel so that final customers are insulated from price increases. Gasoline is about 25 cents a gallon in Venezuela and about 60 cents in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iran.
There"s been a huge transfer of power to oil producers. Even at $100 a barrel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates will earn almost $8 trillion in oil revenues between now and 2020, estimates the McKinsey Global Institute. More troubling are the political implications. "This has really strengthened the Iranians, Russians and Venezuelans to be more provocative in the world," says Larry Goldstein of the Energy Policy Research Foundation. Although governments control crude supplies, private companies have dominated distribution. Anyone can buy oil at a price. Now oil could become a political commodity, used by governments to cement their alliances, offered to friends at a discount; withheld from rivals.
How can we retrieve some of our lost power? The first thing is to get out of denial. Stop blaming oil companies, "speculators" and other scapegoats for a situation not of their making. Next, we need to expand oil and natural-gas drilling in the United States, including Alaska. No, we can"t "drill our way" out of this problem. But we can augment oil supplies and lessen price strains on global markets. It might take 10 years or more, because new projects are huge undertakings. But delay will only aggravate our future problems, just as past errors aggravate present problems.
Finally, we need to let high prices work. Aside from encouraging fuel-efficient vehicles and disciplining driving habits, they may also stimulate development of new biofuels from wood chips, food waste and switch grass. Production costs of these fuels may be in the range of $1 a gallon. If true, that"s well below today"s wholesale gasoline prices. To assure new producers that they wouldn"t be wiped out if oil prices plunged, we should set a floor price for oil of $50 to $80 a barrel, about 40 percent to 60 percent of today"s levels. It"s a worthy idea and can be done with a standby tariff. It would activate only if prices hit the threshold. We know that oil prices are unpredictable, and should a price collapse occur, Americans wouldn"t be deluded into thinking we"ve returned permanently to cheap energy. We"ve made that mistake before.
单选题 In the first paragraph the author implies that ______
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 第一段提到了日益高涨的石油需求对石油价格的推动作用,并提到发展中国家对石油价格的补贴也是造成石油价格上涨的原因。
单选题 One of the political implications of the present oil price rise is the fear that ______
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 在第二段作者指出,石油价格上涨所带来的政治影响更令人感到不安(troubling)。下文接着引用了Larry Goldstein的话,他担心伊朗、俄罗斯和委内瑞拉等主要石油生产国会因此变得更好斗。本段最后提到,石油可能成为政治商品,被那些不友好的石油生产国利用来达到拉帮结伙的目的。
A:是不对的,第二段只提到了几个对美国等西方国家不友好的国家,并没有提到“所有”产油国都把石油当成了一种拉帮结伙的政治工具。
单选题 Which of the following measures can be taken to offset the oil shock?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 第三、四段提到了一些降低油价的措施。其中第三段建议说美国应该加强在阿拉斯加等地的石油和天然气开采。作者说,这虽然不能帮助美国彻底解决问题,甚至也不能立刻解决问题,但至少能缓解对全球石油市场的压力。美国政府应该立刻做出决策,以防形势进一步恶化。
单选题 What can be done to protect the new biofuel producers when oil price falls?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第四段提到鼓励开发新的生物能源的问题。第五句中提到的new producers指新的生物能源的开发商,而不是指石油生产商或生产国。如果油价急剧下跌,这些新的生物能源开发商就可能被逐出市场(be wiped out),所以,为了保护它们的利益,保证它们不被逐出市场,作者建议为石油设定一个基价。油价一旦低于这个基价,就可以通过机动的税收政策将油价推回到基价之内。
单选题 What is the text mainly about?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 文章第一段提到了造成石油价格上涨的原因,第二段提到石油价格上涨可能给世界带来的影响,第三、四段则提到了美国应该如何面对和应付这一形势。第三段最后一句和第四段最后两句都提出了警告:我们必须正视目前的问题,吸取教训,不能再犯以前犯过的错误。可见,本文的重点不是谈造成石油价格上涨的原因(这仅仅是第一段的主题),也不是谈石油价格上涨对富国的影响(第二段谈到的不仅仅是石油价格上涨对富国的影响,而是对全球形势的影响),而是如何接受以前的教训,采取措施应对目前的形势。