Text 2
Running may be the single most effective exercise to increase life expectancy, according to a new review and analysis of past research about exercise and premature death. The new study found that, compared to non-runners, runners tended to live about three additional years, even if they run slowly or sporadically and smoke, drink or are overweight. No other form of exercise that researchers looked at showed comparable impacts on life span.
The findings come as a follow-up to a study done three years ago, in which a group of distinguished exercise scientists scrutinized data from a large trove of medical and fitness tests conducted at the Cooper Institute in Dallas. That analysis found that as little as five minutes of daily running was associated with prolonged life spans.
After that study was released, the researchers were inundated with queries from fellow scientists and the general public, says Duck-chul Lee, a professor of kinesiology at Iowa State University and co-author of the study. Some people asked if other activities, such as walking, were likely to be as beneficial as running for reducing mortality risks.
High-mileage runners wondered if they could be doing too much, and if at some undefined number of miles or hours, running might become counterproductive and even contribute to premature mortality.
And a few people questioned whether running really added materially to people’s life spans. Could it be, they asked rather peevishly, that if in order to reduce your risk of dying by a year, you had to spend the equivalent of a year’s worth of time on the trails or track, producing no discernible net gain?
So for the new study, which was published in March in Progress in Cardiovascular Disease, Lee and his colleagues set out to address those and related issues by reanalyzing data from the Cooper Institute and also examining results from a number of other large-scale recent studies looking into the associations between exercise and mortality.
Over all, this new review reinforced the findings of the earlier research, the scientists determined. Cumulatively, the data indicated that running, whatever someone’s pace or mileage, dropped a person’s risk of premature death by almost 40%, a benefit that held true even when the researchers controlled for smoking, drinking and a history of health problems such as hypertension or obesity.
It is implied in Paragraph 1 that runners________.
全文总体分析
文章分为七段,论证科学研究跑步有益于延长生命。第一段提出跑步的好处。第二、三段通 过科学研究指出跑步与寿命延长的关系。 第四、五段论述很多人质疑跑步是否有负面作用,是 否真的能延长寿命。 第六、七段进一步用科学研究证实跑步可以降低死亡风险。
试题详解
【试题类型】推断题
【题干信息】Paragraph 1
根据题干关键词定位到文章第一段。 A 项跑步者“跑得很慢或三天打鱼两天晒 网”和 C 项跑步 者“喜欢喝酒 和抽烟”均与 文 中 even if they run slowly or sporadically and smoke, drink 不相符,在文中仅仅是一种让步的表述,故错误。 D 项“过健康的生活”并未在 文中提及, 因此错误。 通过原文 compared to non-runners, runners tends to live about three additional years 可知,B 项符合题意,故本题选 B。
The analysis of the medical and fitness tests showed that________.
【试题类型】细节题
【题干信息】medical and fitness tests
根据题干关键词定位到文章第二段最后一句 That analysis found that as little as five minutes of daily running was associated with prolonged life spans。 A 项意为“每天跑步在 延长寿命方面扮演着重要角色”,其中 play an important role 是对 was associated with 的同 义替换,故正确。 B 项多了 totally 一词,过于绝对,故错误。 C 项意为“每天跑步不能降低死 亡风险”,其与文中第三段 最后一句 as beneficial as running for reducing mortality risks 相 悖,故错误。 D 项意为“每天跑步可以增强人们的幸福感”,其在文中不能找到相关信息,因 此错误,故本题选 A。
The following aspects are the reasons why the researchers were inundated with queries EXCEPT that ________.
【试题类型】细节题
【题干信息】reasons, EXCEPT
根据题干关键词定位到文章第三段。 A 项意为“一些人想知道散步是否和跑步 一样有益”,其是对该段最后一句 Some people asked if other activities, such as walking, were likely to be as beneficial as running for reducing mortality risks 的同义替换,故正确。 B 项意 为“长距离跑步者想知道跑步是否可导致过早死亡”,其是对第四段第一句的同义替换,故 正确。 C 项是第五段第一句的内容,故正确。 D 项关键词 calmly 意为“冷静地”,该词与文章 第五段第二句关键词 peevishly(暴躁地)意思相悖,因此错误,故本题选 D。
According to the passage, the new review indicated that________.
【试题类型】细节题
【题干信息】the new review
根据题干关键词定位到文章最后一段。 分析该段可知:科学证实先前对于每天 跑步的研究发现是正确的;跑步可以降低人们过早死亡的风险;剔除吸烟、饮酒以及其他 健康问题,每天跑步是有益处的。 因此,A、B、D 三项均错误。 而且,文章第五段是在说明跑 步的好处,故本题选 C。
The author’s attitude toward running is________.
【试题类型】态度题
【题干信息】the author’s attitude
分析文章可知:一、二段说明了跑步有益于延长生命;三、四、五段指出很多人 对“跑步有益于延长生命”存在质疑;六、七段证实了“跑步有益于延长生命”这一观点。由此可知,作者只是客观地陈述了先前的研究发现,道出了人们的质疑,并没有表明自己的 态度,立场中立,故本题选 C。
全文重点词汇和短语
expectancy n. 预期
premature a. 未成熟的;过早的
sporadically ad. 偶发地
comparable a. 类似的;可比较的
distinguished a. 著名的;卓越的
scrutinize v. 仔细查看,认真检查
prolonged a. 拖延的
inundate v. 淹没
counterproductive a. 事与愿违,适得其反
peevishly ad. 暴躁地
equivalent a. 等值的
discernible a. 可辨别的
net gain 净收益
reinforce v. 加强
cumulatively ad. 累计地;渐增地
hypertension n. 高血压
全文翻译
对以前的一项关于锻炼和过早死亡的研究所做的最新回顾和分析表明,在延长人均预期寿命方面,跑步或许是最有效的一种运动。新的研究发现,比起不跑步的人,跑步的人通常可以多活三年,即便他们跑得很慢或三天打鱼两天晒网,还吸烟或超重。研究人员评估过的其他任何运动形式,它们对寿命的影响力都不能与跑步相媲美。
上述结论是三年前的一项研究的后续成果。在那项研究中,一群杰出的运动科学家仔细分析了达拉斯库珀研究所所做的大量医学和体能测试数据。分析结果显示,即便每天只跑步五分钟,其也与寿命的延长有关联。
那篇论文的共同作者艾奥瓦州立大学运动学教授李德铢说,论文发表后,来自科学家同行和普通民众的大量问询让研究人员应接不暇。一些人问他们,在降低死亡风险方面,散步等其他运动是否和跑步有着一样的效果。
长距离跑步者想知道,他们是不是跑得太多了,当跑步里程或时长达到某个尚未明确的点之后,跑步会不会起反作用,甚至促成过早死亡。
还有少数人怀疑,跑步是否真的能在实际意义上延长人的寿命。他们怒冲冲地问到:为了降低死亡风险,让自己多活一年,你不得不把同样长的时间花在赛道或马路上,净收益是不是微乎其微?
于是,在三月份刊登在《心血管疾病进展》期刊上的这项新研究中,李德铢和同事着手解答上述疑问以及相关问题,他们重新分析了来自库珀研究所的数据,还检验了近来其他着眼于运动与死亡之间关联的大规模研究的成果。
科学家们认为,总的来说,这项新的回顾性研究夯实了早前的研究结论。相关数据逐渐表明,不论速度快慢、里程长短,跑步都可以让一个人过早死亡的风险下降约40%,即便在研究人员剔除吸烟、饮酒以及高血压、肥胖之类过往病史等因素后也是如此。