复合题

One positive consequence of our current national crisis may be at least a temporary shadow in Hollywood’s culture of violence. Fearful of offending audiences in the wake of the terrorist attack, some moviemakers have postponed the release of film with terrorist themes. Television writers are delaying scripts with warlike and terrorist scenarios. It is probably good thinking. My local video store tells me nobody is checking out “disaster” movies. Says the manager, “Currently, people want comedy. They want an escape from stories about violence and terrorism.” Similarly, in the music business, there’s a run on patriotic and inspirational tapes and CDs.

According to The New York Times, the self-scrutiny among these czars of mass-entertainment taste is unprecedented in scale, sweeping aside hundreds of millions of dollars in projects that no longer seem appropriate. A reasonable concern is that this might be a short term phenomenon. Once life returns to something more normal, will Hollywood return to its bad old ways? The Times offers a glimmer of hope. The industry’s titan, it suggests, are struggling with much more difficulties, long range questions of what the public will want once the initial shock from the terrorist attacks wears off. Many in the industry admit they do not know where the boundaries of taste and consumer tolerance now lie.

This is an opportunity for some of us to suggest to Hollywood where that boundary of consumer tolerance is, especially those of us who have not yet convinced Hollywood to cease its descent into ever lower of the dumbness of our young.

The nonprofit Parents Television Council, which monitors the quality of TV programming, says in its latest report that today’s TV shows are more laced than ever with vulgarities, sexual immorality, crudities, violence, and foul language. The traditional family hour between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m., when the networks used to offer programs for the entire family, has disappeared. The problem looks like it will get worse.

That certainly looked to be the case before the Sept. 11th assault. One pre attack New York Times story reported that TV producers were crusading for scripts that include every crude word imaginable. The struggles between net-work censors and producers, according to the report, were “growing more intense”. Producers like Aaron Sorkin of “The West Wing” planned to keep pushing hard. He was quoted as saying, “There’s absolutely no reason why we can’t use the language of adulthood in programs that are about adults”.

My guess is that a lot of adults don’t use the language Mr. Sorkin wants to use, and don’t enjoy having their children hear it. At this moment of crisis in our nation’s history, thought has become more thoughtful, prayerful, and spiritual. It may be the time to tell the entertainment industry that we want not a temporary pause in the flow of tastelessness, but a long term clean-up.

单选题 Some filmmakers hesitate to release new films with violent content because_____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】从第一段可以看出, 9.11恐怖袭击给人们带来了极大的震惊, 由于害怕“offending”惊魂未定的大众, 很多电影制片商“have postponed the release of film with terrorist themes”。 由此可见B符合题意。
单选题 The “self-scrutiny” in the second paragraph refers to filmmakers attempt to_____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】根据第二段“...long range questions of what the public will want once the initial shock from the terrorist attacks wears off”可知, 制片商们不知道观众们目前希望看什么样的电影, 因此才对此进行自我分析。
单选题 The author thinks that it is time for the general audience to_____.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】由第三段第一句“This is an opportunity for some of us to suggest to Hollywood where that boundary of consumer tolerance is.”可知, 这正是一个好时机让观众告诉“口味如何及对暴力电影的容忍度有多大”。
单选题 Which of the following statements is TRUE about Aaron Sorkin?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】倒数第二段Aaron Sorkin说到“There's absolutely no reason why we can't use the language of adulthood in programs that are about adults”, 由此可见他认为不应该对电影中的语言进行限制。
单选题 What is the author’s attitude towards the current practice of the entertainment industry?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】从文章第一段来看,作者认为恐怖主义活动带来了一个“positive consequence”, 也就是冲击了好莱坞的暴力电影文化, 说明作者对好莱坞暴力电影持否定态度。 同时在文章的最后一句中,作者指出, 现在是时候该告诉娱乐界人们所需要的不仅仅是“a temporary pause in the flow of tastelessness”, 而是长期的彻底整顿。 由此可见, 作者对现在娱乐界的做法持批评态度。