阅读理解   An invisible border divides those arguing for computers in the classroom on the behalf of students'' career prospects and those arguing for computers in the classroom for broader reasons of radical educational reform. Very few writers on the subject have explored this distinction--indeed, contradiction--which goes to the heart of what is wrong with the campaign to put computers in the classroom.   An education that aims at getting a student a certain kind of job is a technical education. Justified for reasons radically different from why education is universally required by law. It is not simply to raise everyone''s job prospects that all children are legally required to attend school into their teens. Rather,we have a certain conception of the American citizen, a character who is incomplete if he cannot competently assess how his livelihood and happiness are affected by things outside of himself. But this was not always the case, before it was legally required for all children to attend school until a certain age, it was widely accepted that some were just not equipped by nature to pursue this kind of education. With optimism characteristic of all industrialized countries, we came to accept that everyone is fit to be educated. Computer-education advocates forsake this optimistic notion for a pessimism that betrays their otherwise cheery outlook. Banking on the confusion between educational and vocational reasons for bringing computers into schools, computer-education advocates often emphasize the job prospects of graduates over their educational achievement.   There are some good arguments for a technical education given the fight kind of student. Many European schools introduce the concept of professional training early on in order to make sure children are properly equipped for the professions they want to join. It is, however, presumptuous to insist that there will only be so many jobs for so many scientists, so many businessmen, so many accountants. Besides, this is unlikely to produce the needed number of every kind of professional in a country as large as ours and where the economy is spread over so many states and involves so many international corporations.   But, for a small group of students, professional training might be the way to go since well- developed skills, all other factors being equal, can be the difference between having a job and not. Of course,the basics of using any computer these days are very simple. It does not take a lifelong acquaintance to pick up various software programs. If one wanted to become a computer engineer, that is, of course, and entirely different story. Basic computer skills take--at the very longest--a couple of months to learn. In any case, basic computer skills are only complementary to the host of real skillsthat are necessary to becoming any kind of professional. It should be observed, of course, that no school, vocational or not, is helped by a confusion over its purpose.
单选题 The author thinks the present rush to put computers in the classroom is____________.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】第一段的第一句中invisible border指“模糊界线”。可见对于将计算机引入教室的两种观点还是争论不清。dubiously oriented是“未确定,不明确”。所以B是答案。
单选题 The belief that education is indispensable to all children ____________.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】第二段第五句提供了答案,“我们已接受一观点,每个人都适合教育”。
单选题 It could be inferred from the passage that in the author''s country the European model of professional training is____________.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】第三段第三句中的“presumptuous”是“自以为是的,专断的”。要坚持讲可以为这么多人提供工作是武断的。可以推断,C项与该句意思相同。
单选题 According to the author, basic computer skills should be____________.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】最后一段倒数第二句是本题答案。基本的计算机技能应包括在学校的辅助课程在内。complementary是“辅助的”。