单选题
{{B}}Passage One{{/B}}
A few years ago, when environmentalists in Washington State began agitating to rid local dumps of toxic old computers and televisions, they found an unexpected ally: Hewlett-Packard Co. Teaming up with greens and retailers, hp took on IBM, Apple Computer, and several major TV manufacturers, which were resisting recycling programs because of the costs.
Aided by hp's energetic lobbying, the greens persuaded state lawmakers to adopt a landmark program that forces electronics companies to foot the bill for recycling their old equipment. "This bill puts our market-based economy to work for the environment," said Washington Governor Christine O. Gregoire as she signed the plan into law on Mar 24. The movement to recycle electronic refuse, or "e-waste," is spreading across the nation, and so is hp's clout. The company helped the greens win a big battle in Maine,
In 2004 when the state passed the nation's first e-waste "take-back" law. Washington followed suit. Now, Minnesota and New Jersey are preparing to act, and 19 other states are weighing legislation. Activists hope to banish high-tech junk from landfills and scrub the nation's air and water of lead, chromium, mercury, and other toxins prevalent in digital debris, hp's efforts have made it the darling of environmentalists. They say take-back laws are more effective at getting digital junk recycled than point-of-sale fees, which tax consumer electronics products to fund state-run recycling programs. They're also pleased because effective programs in the U. S. reduce the likelihood that the products will be shipped to less developed countries and disassembled under unsafe conditions.
But hp's agenda isn't entirely altruistic. Take-back laws play to the company's strategic strengths. For decades the computer maker has invested in recycling infrastructure, a move that has lowered its production costs, given it a leg up in the secondary market for equipment, and allowed it to build a customer service out of "asset management," which includes protection of dam that might remain on discarded gear.
In 2005, hp recycled more than 70 000 tons of product, the equivalent of about 10% of company sales and a 15% increase from the year before. And it collected more than 2.5 million units (in excess of 25 000 tons) of hardware to be refurbished for resale or donation.
No other electronics maker has a resale business on this scale. But the others may soon wish to emulate hp. "We see legislation coming," says David Lear, hp's vice-president for corporate, social, and environmental responsibility. "A lot of companies haven't stepped up to the plate.... If we do this right, it becomes an advantage to us."
单选题 Environmentalists found an unexpected ally because ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】推断题。环保主义者找到一个出乎意料的同盟,因为第一段说惠普联合环保主义者以及零售商并带动IBM、苹果电脑和电视制造商这些顾虑回收成本的厂家参与处置电子垃圾的行动。不能由其他厂商介意回收成本而推断惠普不考虑回收成本,所以B错;C选项混淆语意,greens是环保主义者的另一称谓。D选项原文没有原话可佐证。
单选题 Washington Governor Christine O. Gregoire signed the plan that ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】细节题。第2段说环保主义者说服立法机构让电子厂商为回收旧设备埋单。这项说服工作不是惠普提议的,所以不选A。D是迷惑项,是由这项提议形成的环保行动,而非提议增加了惠普的影响力。
单选题 Which state first passed the take-back law?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】细节题。第2段最后一句和第3段第1句说惠普公司在帮助缅因州环保主义者说服立法机构通过全国首个电子垃圾处置法案后,其他各州纷纷仿效。
单选题 Which of the following statements about the e-waste take back laws is NOT true?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】综合判断题。第3段最后一句:在美国有效处置电子垃圾使厂商没必要将它们运到欠发达国家并在危险环境下拆卸。这一句并没有说处置垃圾会直接威胁到靠拆卸电子垃圾谋生的人的生计。所以D选项为答案。
单选题 Why does the author say hp's agenda is not altruistic? Ⅰ. Because recycling infrastructure is a major sources of revenue. Ⅱ. Because secondary market is huge. Ⅲ. Because it can win respect of users and environmentalists. Ⅳ. Because asset management of used computers can add revenue to the company.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】综合判断题。第4段提到惠普公司回收电子垃圾并不完全是“利他”的。它有一个目的是通过开拓二手电脑市场商机和维护旧电脑的客户数据来赚钱。
单选题 hp collected more than 2.5 million hardware units in order to
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】细节题。第5段最后一句说惠普公司回收250万台旧电脑是为了将其翻新然后用于零售或捐赠给有关机构。