问答题荷兰，一个1/3国土居于海平面以下的神奇国度，因拥有高大的风车和艳丽的花卉而被称为风车之国、鲜花的国度，也因遍布浪漫的运河和世界顶级博物馆而闻名于世。它由风车、木鞋、郁金香所串起的如织美景，带给世人无数的梦幻与想象。 荷兰国家旅游会议促进局北京代表处自成立以来，一直致力于以荷兰为目的地的旅游推广，并引领旅游者深入了解荷兰丰富多彩的旅游资源和历史文化。全力为中国的旅游者提供更多、更新的旅游信息，让旅游者真正体会到荷兰旅游的魅力和价值。同时，衷心希望能够通过旅游业，搭起一座坚实便捷的桥梁，为两国人民的友好往来及文化交流提供便捷的平台。 我们是您了解荷兰丰富旅游资源的最佳帮手，能够为您的荷兰旅程提供咨询与帮助将是我们的荣幸。

问答题What is communicative competence? How should we develop it in our foreign lauguage learning? (四川大学2009研)

问答题Determinism

问答题correspondence university

问答题Part A Directions: Write a letter to your company asking for resignation, stating your reason(s). You should write about 100 words. Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use "Jack Cheng" instead. Do not write the address. A Letter of Resignation

问答题“It was hot, yet with a sweet languor about it”（Theodore Dreiser）.

问答题This part is to test your ability to do practical writing. You are required to write a NOTICE according to the following information given in Chinese. Remember to do the task on the Answer Sheet. 请以宿舍管理委员会的名义写一份会议通知，2017年4月5日发出。内容如下：(1)时间：4月7日晚上7点；(2)地点：3号楼3103房间；(3)内容：安全用电、火灾应变、防止失窃等；(4)与会人员：每个寝室一名同学；(5)要求：带笔记本，按时到场，做好记录，并传达给室友。

问答题3. to find out how to provide more talents is my goal.

问答题Directions: Read the following text carefully and then translate underlined segments into Chinese. Write your pieces of Chinese version in the proper space on your Answer SheetⅡ It is astonishing how little is known about the working of the mind. But however little or much is known, it is fairly clear that the model of the logic-machine is not only wrong but mischievous. There are people who profess to believe that man can live by logic alone.If only they say, men developed their reason, looked at all situations and dilemmas logically, and proceeded to devise rational solutions, all human problems would be solved. Be reasonable. Think logically. Act rationally. This line of thought is very persuasive, not to say seductive. 86．{{U}}It is astonishing, however, how frequently the people most fanatically devoted to logic and reason, to a cold review of the "facts" and a calculated construction of the truth, turn out not only to be terribly emotional in argumentation, but obstinate any"truth" is "proved" deeply committed to emotional positions that prove rock-resistible to the most massive accumulation of unsympathetic facts and proofs.{{/U}} 87．{{U}}If man's mind cannot be turned into a logic machine, neither can it function properly as a great emotional sponge, to be squeezed at will.{{/U}} All of us have known people who gush as a general response to life—who gush in seeing a sunset, who gush in reading a book, who gush in meeting a friend. They may seem to live by emotion alone, but their constant gushing is a disguise for absence of genuine feeling, a torrent rushing to fill a vacuum. It is not uncommon to find beneath the gush a cold, analytic mind that is astonishing in its meticulousness and ruthless in its calculation. Somewhere between machine and sponge lies the reality of the mind—a blend of reason and emotion, of actuality and imagination, of fact and feeling. 88．{{U}}The entanglement is so complete, the mixture so thoroughly mixed, that it is probably impossible to achieve pure reason or pure emotion, at least for any sustained period of time.{{/U}} 89．{{U}}It is probably best to assume that all our reasoning is fused with our emotional commitments and beliefs, all our thoughts colored by feelings that lie deep within our psyches.{{/U}} Moreover, it is probably best to assume that this stream of emotion is not a poison,not even a taint, but is a positive life-source, a stream of psychic energy that animates and vitalizes our entire thought process. 90．{{U}}The roots of reason are embedded in feelings—feelings that have formed and accumulated and developed over a lifetime of personality-shaping.{{/U}} These feelings are not for occasional using but are inescapable. To know what we think, we must know how we feel. It is feeling that shapes belief and forms opinion. It is feeling that directs the strategy of argument. It is our feelings, then , with which we must come to honorable terms.

问答题Could the sentence "As the night fell, the wind rose" be alternatively expressed as "As the wind rose, the night fell"? Why or why not? Does this indicate a degree of non-arbitrariness about word order?

问答题TOPICWhat's your idea of the statement "Publish or Perish"?

问答题Directions:A.Studythefollowingpicturecarefullyandwriteanessayinnolessthan160-200words.B.YouressaymustbewrittenclearlyonANSWERSHEET2.C.Youressayshouldmeettherequirementsbelow:1)Describethefollowingdrawing,2)interpretitsmeaning,and3)giveyourcomments.

问答题In informal speech, people often omit sentence subjects because they are commonly understood. What are the omitted subjects in the following two sentences? Why do people know that these are the correct subjects?（南京大学2008研)a. Hope you like everything here.b. Just imagine what has just happened here.

问答题Some critics say that sending children to school at the age of four does not work.

问答题No matter how busy you are, you should spend some time visiting your parents.

问答题There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should human beings be moral? Another way of putting the problem is as follows; Is there any clear foundation or basis for morality? Can any reasons be found for human beings to be good and do right acts rather than be bad and do wrong acts? I have already pointed out the difficulties involved in founding morality on religion, and especially on religion as a safe factor.(1) However, if a person has religious faith, then he or she does have a foundation for a personal morality, even though this foundation is basically psychological rather than logical in nature. What disturbs me about the use of religion as the foundation of morality is the frequently-made assumption that if there is no supernatural or religious basis for morality, then there can be no basis at all. A related, and perhaps deeper, statement is that there can be no real meaning to human life: unless there is some sort of afterlife or some other extra-natural reason for living.(2) It is obvious that for many individuals this is psychologically true; that is, they feel that their existence has meaning and purpose and that they have a reason for being moral if and only if there is a God, an afterlife, or some sort of religion in their lives. I feel that we must respect this point of view and accept the conviction of the many people who hold it, because that is how they feel about life and morality. It is also obvious, however, that many people do not feel this way.(3) I think it is terribly presumptuous of religious believers to feel that if some people do not have a religious commitment, their lives are meaningless, or that such people have no reason for being moral in their actions. But if religion does not necessarily provide a "why" for morality, then what does? Let us assume for a moment that there is no supernatural morality and see if we can find any other reasons why people should be moral. Enlightened Self-interest One can certainly argue on a basis of enlightened self-interest, that it is, at the very least, generally better to be good rather than bad and to create a world and society that is good rather than one that is bad. As a matter of fact, self-interest is the sole basis of one ethical theory, ethical egoism. I am not, however, suggesting at this point that one ought to pursue one's own self-interest. I am merely presenting the argument that if everyone tried to do and be good and to avoid and prevent bad, it would be in everyone's self-interest. For example, if within a group of people no one killed, stole, lied, or cheated, then each member of the group would benefit.(4) An individual member of the group could say, "It's in my self-interest to do good rather than bad because I stand to benefit if I do and also because I could be ostracized or punished if I don't. " Therefore, even though it is not airtight, the argument from enlightened self-interest is a somewhat compelling one. Argument from Tradition and Law Related to the foregoing argument is the argument from tradition and law. This argument suggests that because traditions and laws, established over a long period of time, govern the behavior of human beings and because these traditions and laws urge human beings to be moral rather than immoral, there are good reasons for being so.(5) Self-interest is one reason, but another is respect for the human thought and effort that has gone into establishing such laws and traditions and transferring them from one historic period and one culture to another. This can be an attractive argument, even though it tends to suppress questioning of traditions and laws—a kind of questioning that is, I feel, the very touchstone of creative moral reasoning. It is interesting to note that most of us probably learned morality through being confronted with this argument, the religious argument, and the experiences surrounding them. Don't we all remember being told we should or should not do something because it was or was not in our own self-interest, because God said it was right or wrong, or because it was the way we were supposed to act in our family, school, society, and world?

问答题In less than 30 years" time, there will be television chat shows hosted by robots and cars with pollution monitors that will disable them when they offend. Children will play with dolls equipped with personality chips. computers with in-built personalities will be regarded as workmates rather than tools, relaxation will be in front of smell-television, and digital age will have arrived.

问答题{{B}}Outline:{{/B}} A. The great importance of tourist industry for China; B. Problems with China's management of our tourist industry; C. My suggestions on how to improve travel management, especially the travel in big holidays.

问答题黑社会性质组织

问答题Discuss the relationship between linguistics and language teaching.