单选题You ______go home now. It's getting late.

单选题Speaker A: That' s very kind of you m do so.Speaker B:______

单选题What is the basis for the banking system?

单选题People in New York _______.

单选题Ann: Do you still have a headache, Bill? Bnl: Yes. I do. And now I have a fever and cough constantly. Arm:

单选题The whole village ______ by a sudden flood, they had to stay in tents.

单选题This crop does not do well in soils _____the one for which it has been specially developed.

单选题No sooner ______ reading the poem ______ the students ,began to ask her questions.

单选题This passage is______too difficult for the juniors and______too easy for the seniors.

单选题Which of the following makes the demonstration most persuasive?

单选题They are both very determined people, so there's rather a ______ of personalities.

单选题If we ______ sooner, we might have got there. A. started B. had started C. would have started D. start

单选题Jack（） in a bank. He went to the bank after graduation and he has never changed his job.

单选题In the country we are Uexcluded/U from the worries of life in a big town.

单选题A :Let me introduce myself. I am Henry. B: Henry. I am Peter BrowrL Call me Peter or Mr. Brown.

单选题The newspaper______ two people were killed in the accident.

单选题Even if you are an experienced teacher, you sometimes ______ make some mistakes. A. can B. must C. should D. will

单选题Manufacturing is Canada's most important economic activity. It ______ more than half the value of all Canadian production. A. accounts for B. amounts to C. takes up D. turns out

单选题 September 11 should have driven home a basic lesson for the Bush administration about life in an interconnected world: misery abroad threatens security at home. It is no coincidence that Osama Bin Laden found warm hospitality in the Taliban's Afghanistan, whose citizens were among the most impoverished and oppressed on earth. If the administration took this lesson seriously, it would dump the rules of realpolitik that have governed U.S. foreign aid policy for 50 years. Instead, it is pouring money into an ally of convenience, Pakistan, which is ultimately likely to expand the ranks of anti-American terrorists abroad. To enlist Pakistan in the fight against the Taliban, the Bush administration resurrected the Cold War tradition of propping up despotic military regimes in the name of peace and freedom. Its commitment of billions of dollars to Pakistan since September 11 will further entrench the sort of government that has made Pakistan both a development failure and a geopolitical hotspot for decades. Within Pakistan, the aid may ultimately create enough angry young men to make up A1 Qaeda's losses in Afghanistan. In South Asia as a whole, the cash infusion may accelerate a dangerous arms race with India. Historically, the U.S. government has cloaked aid to allies such as Pakistan in the rhetoric of economic development. As a Cold War ally, Pakistan received some $ 37 billion in grants and loans from the West between 1960 and 1990, adjusting for inflation. And since September 11, the U.S. administration has promised more of the' same. It has dropped sanctions imposed after Pakistan detonated a nuclear bomb in 1998, pushed through a $1.3 billion IMF loan for Pakistan, and called for another $2 billion from the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. The Bush administration is also, ironically, pressing allies to join it in canceling or rescheduling billions of dollars of old (and failed) loans that were granted in past decades in response to similar arm-twisting. Despite--even because of--all this aid, Pakistan is now one of the most indebted, impoverished, militarized nations on earth. The causes of Pakistan's poverty are sadly familiar. The government ignored family planning, leading to population expansion from 50 million in 1960 to nearly 150 million today, for an average growth rate of 2.6 percent a year. Foreign aid meant to pave rural roads went into unneeded city highways--or pockets of top officials. And the military grew large, goaded by a regional rivalry with India that has three times bubbled into war. The result is a government that, as former World Bank economist William Easterly has observed, "cannot bring off a simple and cheap measles (麻疹) vaccination (预防接种) program, and yet...can build nuclear weapons."